Literature DB >> 10848722

A comparison of the risks of venous thromboembolic disease in association with different combined oral contraceptives.

R D Farmer1, R A Lawrenson, J C Todd, T J Williams, K D MacRae, F Tyrer, G M Leydon.   

Abstract

AIMS: In October 1995 in response to the results of three studies, the Committee on the Safety of Medicines advised doctors and pharmacists that oral contraceptives containing desogestrel (DSG) and gestodene (GST) were associated with around a two-fold increase in the risk of thromboembolism compared with those containing other progestogens. The objective of this study was to estimate the risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) in users of combined oral contraceptives (COCs), to compare the risk between formulations and to examine the effect of using age banding as opposed to matching by exact year of birth.
METHODS: A nested case control study was conducted using the General Practice Research Database. Women with a VTE event recorded between 1992 and 1997, who were treated with an anticoagulant, from consideration of their prescription records were likely to have been using a COC prescription on the day of the event and also had no exclusion factors, were deemed cases. For comparison with the previous studies, two nested case control studies were undertaken. Study 1 used controls matched by practice and year of birth. Study 2 used controls matched by practice and within 5 years age bands.
RESULTS: We found an incidence of idiopathic VTE amongst users of combined oral contraceptives of 3.8 per 10 000 exposed women years. Incidence rates increased markedly after 35 years of age. The nested case-control study using controls matched by year of birth showed no significant difference in risk between the major COC formulations. With levonorgestrel (LNG) 150 microgram and ethinyloestradiol (EE) 30 microgram as the reference, the adjusted ORs for GST 75 microgram and EE 30 microgram was 1.3 (95% CI 0.8, 2.1), for DSG 150 microgram and EE 30 microgram it was 1.0 (95% CI 0.7, 1.7) and for DSG 150 microgram and EE 20 microgram it was 0.8 (95% CI 0.4, 1.6). Using less rigorous matching criteria, matching controls to cases within 5 years age bands, the ORs increased. When a mixed group of COCs, characterized by having LNG as the progestogen component was used as the reference category, there was an elevation in the ORs for the newer products. We found a significant association between idiopathic VTE and current smoking (OR 2.0 (1.4, 2.7)), BMI over 35 (OR 3.8 (1.8, 8.0)) and asthma (OR 1.9 (1.3, 2.9)). The OR for women who had proxy evidence of general ill health (indicated by the number of prescriptions issued) was 2.2 (1.7, 3.7).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that a number of the characteristics of the women taking COCs affect the risk of VTE. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that there is any difference in risk between COC formulations containing under 50 microg ethinyloestradiol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10848722      PMCID: PMC2015039          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00198.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  17 in total

1.  Validation of information recorded on general practitioner based computerised data resource in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  H Jick; S S Jick; L E Derby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-03-30

2.  Third-generation oral contraceptives and venous thrombosis.

Authors:  H Jick; S S Jick; M W Myers; C Vasilakis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-03-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Oral contraceptives and venous thromboembolism: findings in a large prospective study.

Authors:  M Vessey; D Mant; A Smith; D Yeates
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-02-22

4.  Advising women on which pill to take.

Authors:  J Guillebaud
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-10-28

5.  Whipping up panic about the pill.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-10-26       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Oral contraceptives and nonfatal vascular disease.

Authors:  J B Porter; J R Hunter; H Jick; A Stergachis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Oral contraceptives, smoking, and other factors in relation to risk of venous thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  D B Petitti; J Wingerd; F Pellegrin; S Ramcharan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Oral contraceptive oestrogen and progestin potencies and the incidence of deep venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  B B Gerstman; J M Piper; J P Freiman; D K Tomita; D L Kennedy; W J Ferguson; R C Bennett
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Venous thromboembolism in relation to oral contraceptive use.

Authors:  S P Helmrich; L Rosenberg; D W Kaufman; B Strom; S Shapiro
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Oral contraceptive estrogen dose and the risk of deep venous thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  B B Gerstman; J M Piper; D K Tomita; W J Ferguson; B V Stadel; F E Lundin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  27 in total

1.  Pitfalls of pharmacoepidemiology.

Authors:  R Farmer; T Williams; A Nightingale
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-25

2.  Pitfalls of pharmacoepidemiology.

Authors:  D C Skegg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-11

3.  Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thrombosis: meta-analysis.

Authors:  J M Kemmeren; A Algra; D E Grobbee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-21

4.  Venous thromboembolism in patients with membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Sophia Lionaki; Vimal K Derebail; Susan L Hogan; Sean Barbour; Taewoo Lee; Michelle Hladunewich; Allen Greenwald; Yichun Hu; Caroline E Jennette; J Charles Jennette; Ronald J Falk; Daniel C Cattran; Patrick H Nachman; Heather N Reich
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 6.  Oral contraceptives and venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lamberto Manzoli; Corrado De Vito; Carolina Marzuillo; Antonio Boccia; Paolo Villari
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Fatal venous thromboembolism associated with different combined oral contraceptives: a study of incidences and potential biases in spontaneous reporting.

Authors:  Karin Hedenmalm; Eva Samuelsson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  The Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Albrecht Encke; Sylvia Haas; Ina Kopp
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Association of Risk for Venous Thromboembolism With Use of Low-Dose Extended- and Continuous-Cycle Combined Oral Contraceptives: A Safety Study Using the Sentinel Distributed Database.

Authors:  Jie Li; Genna Panucci; David Moeny; Wei Liu; Judith C Maro; Sengwee Toh; Ting-Ying Huang
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Factor V leiden thrombophilia in a female collegiate soccer athlete: a case report.

Authors:  Kendra Erickson; Michael E Powers
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.