Literature DB >> 20839698

Patient satisfaction following TKA: Bless them all!

David Beverland1.   

Abstract

Survivorship following modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is good with revision rates generally lower than for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our experience in Belfast supports that fact with original component survivorship of 99% for the low contact stress rotating platform TKA, which is better than our THA survivorship. It is important to discriminate between survivorship and patient satisfaction. In Belfast, as well as the more familiar outcome scores, we also use a very simple 4-point satisfaction questionnaire: "How would you best describe your satisfaction with your new joint" where 1=very happy, 2=happy, 3=OK but not perfect, and 4=I have never been happy. We applied this questionnaire to our 10-year THA and TKA patients. When we looked specifically at the numbers of patients who were either "very happy" or "never happy," the results were very different. The very happy percentage for hips was much higher than for knees (54% vs 4%) and conversely, the number of never happy knees was much higher than for hips (7% vs 1%). These results are not unique to Belfast. As surgeons, we often think that the knee implant that we use is the best but at present, the implant is no longer the most critical factor. We need to increase the number of very happy patients and decrease the number of never happy ones. In my opinion the two key factors that we should focus on are patient expectation and surgeon education. Copyright 2010, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20839698     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20100722-23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  6 in total

1.  Kinematic analysis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hua-Wei Liu; Ming Ni; Guo-Qiang Zhang; Xiang Li; Hui Chen; Qiang Zhang; Wei Chai; Yong-Gang Zhou; Ji-Ying Chen; Yu-Liang Liu; Cheng-Kung Cheng; Yan Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  No bias for developer publications and no difference between first-generation trochlear-resurfacing versus trochlear-cutting implants in 15,306 cases of patellofemoral joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Birgit Reihs; Florian Reihs; Gerold Labek; Markus Hochegger; Andreas Leithner; Nikolaus Böhler; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Kinematic analysis of a posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Zhi-Xin Zhao; Liang Wen; Tie-Bing Qu; Li-Li Hou; Dong Xiang; Jia Bin
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  Clinical outcomes after using patient specific instrumentation: is it worth the effort? A minimum 5-year retrospective review of 298 PSI knees.

Authors:  Luke Nugent; Sarang Kasture; Muthu Ganapathi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 2.928

5.  Determinants of patient satisfaction and their willingness to return after primary total hip replacement: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tom Schaal; Tonio Schoenfelder; Joerg Klewer; Joachim Kugler
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Length of stay after introduction of a new total knee arthroplasty (TKA)-results of a German retrospective database analysis.

Authors:  Bernd Brüggenjürgen; Christian Muehlendyck; Laura-Valentina Gador; Alexander Katzer
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2019-08-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.