BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hospital-based low vision services in the UK typically involve one consultation with an optometrist. In this study we investigated the effect of adding further low vision device training. METHODS:Participants were recruited from those attending their first low vision assessment (LVA). Participants completed the Mass of Activity Inventory (MAI) questionnaire by telephone before their appointment. After LVA, participants were randomised to an intervention group (who received a further appointment to review device handling) or a control group. The MAI was readministered 1 and 3 months after the initial LVA. MAI data were converted to Rasch scores for goal difficulty. RESULTS:Ninety-six participants completed the study. Both groups experienced a significant improvement in goal difficulty following low vision intervention (p<0.0001), equivalent to a visual acuity improvement of approximately 0.55 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). There was no significant difference in improvement between the group randomised to the training visit and those in the control arm (p=0.80). CONCLUSION: Self-perceived difficulty with daily visual tasks decreases following a low vision appointment. An additional visit for device handling training resulted in no further improvement. This could be due to the relatively simple nature of the devices prescribed in this clinic. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN05434212.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hospital-based low vision services in the UK typically involve one consultation with an optometrist. In this study we investigated the effect of adding further low vision device training. METHODS:Participants were recruited from those attending their first low vision assessment (LVA). Participants completed the Mass of Activity Inventory (MAI) questionnaire by telephone before their appointment. After LVA, participants were randomised to an intervention group (who received a further appointment to review device handling) or a control group. The MAI was readministered 1 and 3 months after the initial LVA. MAI data were converted to Rasch scores for goal difficulty. RESULTS: Ninety-six participants completed the study. Both groups experienced a significant improvement in goal difficulty following low vision intervention (p<0.0001), equivalent to a visual acuity improvement of approximately 0.55 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). There was no significant difference in improvement between the group randomised to the training visit and those in the control arm (p=0.80). CONCLUSION: Self-perceived difficulty with daily visual tasks decreases following a low vision appointment. An additional visit for device handling training resulted in no further improvement. This could be due to the relatively simple nature of the devices prescribed in this clinic. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN05434212.
Authors: Ruth Ma van Nispen; Gianni Virgili; Mirke Hoeben; Maaike Langelaan; Jeroen Klevering; Jan Ee Keunen; Ger Hmb van Rens Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-01-27
Authors: Ashley D Deemer; Robert W Massof; Barry W Rovner; Robin J Casten; Catherine V Piersol Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 4.799