Michal Engelman1, Emily M Agree, Lucy A Meoni, Michael J Klag. 1. Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Pubic Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Room E4647, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. mengelma@jhsph.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We used longitudinal data from the Johns Hopkins Precursors Study to test the hypothesis that written propositional density measured early in life is lower for people who develop dementia categorized as Alzheimer's disease (AD). This association was reported in 1996 for the Nun Study, and the Precursors Study offered an unprecedented chance to reexamine it among respondents with different gender, education, and occupation profiles. METHODS: Eighteen individuals classified as AD patients (average age at diagnosis: 74) were assigned 2 sex-and-age matched controls, and propositional density in medical school admission essays (average age at writing: 22) was assessed via Computerized Propositional Idea Density Rater 3 linguistic analysis software. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for the matched case-control study were calculated using conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression. RESULTS: Mean propositional density is lower for cases than for controls (4.70 vs. 4.99 propositions per 10 words, 1-sided p = .01). Higher propositional density substantially lowers the odds of AD (OR = 0.16, 95% confidence interval = 0.03-0.90, 1-sided p = .02). DISCUSSION: Propositional density scores in writing samples from early adulthood appear to predict AD in later life for men as well as women. Studies of cognition across the life course might beneficially incorporate propositional density as a potential marker of cognitive reserve.
OBJECTIVES: We used longitudinal data from the Johns Hopkins Precursors Study to test the hypothesis that written propositional density measured early in life is lower for people who develop dementia categorized as Alzheimer's disease (AD). This association was reported in 1996 for the Nun Study, and the Precursors Study offered an unprecedented chance to reexamine it among respondents with different gender, education, and occupation profiles. METHODS: Eighteen individuals classified as ADpatients (average age at diagnosis: 74) were assigned 2 sex-and-age matched controls, and propositional density in medical school admission essays (average age at writing: 22) was assessed via Computerized Propositional Idea Density Rater 3 linguistic analysis software. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for the matched case-control study were calculated using conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression. RESULTS: Mean propositional density is lower for cases than for controls (4.70 vs. 4.99 propositions per 10 words, 1-sided p = .01). Higher propositional density substantially lowers the odds of AD (OR = 0.16, 95% confidence interval = 0.03-0.90, 1-sided p = .02). DISCUSSION: Propositional density scores in writing samples from early adulthood appear to predict AD in later life for men as well as women. Studies of cognition across the life course might beneficially incorporate propositional density as a potential marker of cognitive reserve.
Authors: Kimberly Diggle Mueller; Rebecca L Koscik; Lyn S Turkstra; Sarah K Riedeman; Asenath LaRue; Lindsay R Clark; Bruce Hermann; Mark A Sager; Sterling C Johnson Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Elliot Hampsey; Marton Meszaros; Caroline Skirrow; Rebecca Strawbridge; Rosie H Taylor; Lazarus Chok; Dag Aarsland; Ammar Al-Chalabi; Ray Chaudhuri; Jack Weston; Emil Fristed; Aleksandra Podlewska; Olabisi Awogbemila; Allan H Young Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-06-06 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Caitlin S Latimer; Bridget T Burke; Nicole F Liachko; Heather N Currey; Mitchell D Kilgore; Laura E Gibbons; Jonathan Henriksen; Martin Darvas; Kimiko Domoto-Reilly; Suman Jayadev; Tom J Grabowski; Paul K Crane; Eric B Larson; Brian C Kraemer; Thomas D Bird; C Dirk Keene Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 7.578
Authors: Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky; Isabella Sharrad; Caitlin A Howlett; Phillip M Alday; Andrew W Corcoran; Valeria Bellan; Erica Wilkinson; Reinhold Kliegl; Richard L Lewis; Steven L Small; Matthias Schlesewsky Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-08-26