Literature DB >> 20837634

Is the band count useful in the diagnosis of infection? An accuracy study in critically ill patients.

Rodrigo Cavallazzi1, Charles-Lwanga Bennin, Amyn Hirani, Christopher Gilbert, Paul E Marik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The presence of immature neutrophils (bands) in the circulating blood is often used as a clinical indicator of sepsis. Indeed, a band count greater than 10% is one of the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine's systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria used to diagnose sepsis. However, the literature regarding the diagnostic accuracy of an elevated band count for the diagnosis of infection is limited. AIM: To determine the accuracy of a band count greater than 10% and increased or decreased white blood cell (WBC) count in diagnosing infection in a heterogeneous group of intensive care unit (ICU) patients.
METHODS: We prospectively recorded the WBC and band count on consecutive patients admitted to our ICU. Each patient was evaluated for the presence of infection according to defined criteria. The diagnostic accuracy of band count and total WBC count were determined by standard statistical methods.
RESULTS: Overall, 145 patients were enrolled, of whom 42 (29%) had a defined infection on admission to the ICU. On multiple logistic regression, the odds ratio for infection was 8.67 (95% CI 3.36-22.39; P < .001) for patients with band count greater than 10% and 1.6 (95% CI 0.78-3.29; P = .2) for a WBC count greater than 12 × 10(9)/L. A band count greater than 10% had sensitivity of 43% (95% CI 28%-59%), specificity of 92% (95% CI 85%-97%), positive likelihood ratio of 5.52 (95% CI 2.6-11.7), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.62 (95% CI 0.47-0.81) for the diagnosis of infection.
CONCLUSION: Band count may provide useful information in patients whose diagnosis of infection is uncertain. An elevated band count leads to a moderate increase in the likelihood of infection. A negative test, however, leads to only a small change in the posttest probability of infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20837634     DOI: 10.1177/0885066610377980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0885-0666            Impact factor:   3.510


  11 in total

1.  A comprehensive time-course-based multicohort analysis of sepsis and sterile inflammation reveals a robust diagnostic gene set.

Authors:  Timothy E Sweeney; Aaditya Shidham; Hector R Wong; Purvesh Khatri
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 2.  The complete blood count to diagnose septic shock.

Authors:  Joshua David Farkas
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  A stratification strategy to predict secondary infection in critical illness-induced immune dysfunction: the REALIST score.

Authors:  Jan-Alexis Tremblay; Florian Peron; Louis Kreitmann; Julien Textoris; Karen Brengel-Pesce; Anne-Claire Lukaszewicz; Laurence Quemeneur; Christophe Vedrine; Lionel K Tan; Fabienne Venet; Thomas Rimmele; Guillaume Monneret
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 10.318

4.  The predictive role of Interleukin 6 in burn patients with positive blood cultures.

Authors:  Jochen Gille; Jovan Jocovic; Thomas Kremer; Armin Sablotzki
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-04-15

5.  Delta neutrophil index as an early marker for differential diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and sepsis.

Authors:  Hee-Jin Park; You-Jung Ha; Jung-Yoon Pyo; Yong-Beom Park; Soo-Kon Lee; Sang-Won Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  The diagnostic and prognostic significance of monitoring blood levels of immature neutrophils in patients with systemic inflammation.

Authors:  Tracey Anne Mare; David Floyd Treacher; Manu Shankar-Hari; Richard Beale; Sion Marc Lewis; David John Chambers; Kenneth Alun Brown
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Don't miss the diagnosis of sepsis!

Authors:  Paul E Marik
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  The delta neutrophil index (DNI) as a prognostic marker for mortality in adults with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chiwon Ahn; Wonhee Kim; Tae Ho Lim; Youngsuk Cho; Kyu-Sun Choi; Bo-Hyoung Jang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Host Diagnostic Biomarkers of Infection in the ICU: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

Authors:  Aaron J Heffernan; Kerina J Denny
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.725

10.  Pediatric sepsis phenotypes for enhanced therapeutics: An application of clustering to electronic health records.

Authors:  Ioannis Koutroulis; Tom Velez; Tony Wang; Seife Yohannes; Jessica E Galarraga; Joseph A Morales; Robert J Freishtat; James M Chamberlain
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.