Literature DB >> 20836596

Can nonhuman primates use tokens to represent and sum quantities?

Theodore A Evans1, Michael J Beran, Elsa Addessi.   

Abstract

It is unclear whether nonhuman animals can use physical tokens to flexibly represent various quantities by combining token values. Previous studies showed that chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and a macaque (Macaca mulatta) were only partly successful in tests involving sets of different-looking food containers representing different food quantities, while some capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) have shown greater success in tests involving sets of various concrete objects representing different food quantities. Some of the discrepancy in results between these studies may be attributed to the different methods used. In an effort to reconcile these discrepancies, we presented two primates species, chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys, with two token tasks. The critical test in each task involved summing the value of multiple tokens of different types to make accurate quantity judgments. We found that, using either method, individuals of both species learned to associate individual tokens with specific quantities, as well as successfully compare individual tokens to one another or to sets of visible food items. However, regardless of method, only a few individuals exhibited the capacity to sum multiple tokens of different types and then use those summed values to make an optimal response. This suggests that flexible combination of symbolic stimuli in quantity judgments tasks is within the abilities of chimpanzees and capuchins but does not characterize the majority of individuals. Furthermore, the results suggest the need to carefully examine specific methodological details that may promote or hinder such possible representation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20836596      PMCID: PMC5152591          DOI: 10.1037/a0019855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  41 in total

1.  Representation of the numerosities 1-9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  E M Brannon; H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2000-01

2.  Ordinal judgments and summation of nonvisible sets of food items by two chimpanzees and a rhesus macaque.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Mary M Beran; Emily H Harris; David A Washburn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-07

3.  Summation and quantity judgments of sequentially presented sets by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans; Katherine A Leighty; Emily H Harris; Daniel Rice
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  Do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use tokens as symbols?

Authors:  E Addessi; L Crescimbene; E Visalberghi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Its own reward: lessons to be drawn from the reversed-reward contingency paradigm.

Authors:  Eran M Shifferman
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee.

Authors:  R A Gardner; B T Gardner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-08-15       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Comprehension of sentences by bottlenosed dolphins.

Authors:  L M Herman; D G Richards; J P Wolz
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1984-03

8.  Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  M J Beran
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Trading behavior between conspecifics in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Monkeys reject unequal pay.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Frans B M De Waal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  7 in total

1.  Sequential responding and planning in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) delay gratification by choosing token exchange over immediate reward consumption.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.371

3.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) transfer tokens repeatedly with a partner to accumulate rewards in a self-control task.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Bonnie M Perdue; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 4.  Non-human primate token use shows possibilities but also limitations for establishing a form of currency.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Quantity-quality trade-off in the acquisition of token preference by capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.).

Authors:  E Quintiero; S Gastaldi; F De Petrillo; E Addessi; S Bourgeois-Gironde
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Macaque monkeys can learn token values from human models through vicarious reward.

Authors:  Sara Bevacqua; Erika Cerasti; Rossella Falcone; Milena Cervelloni; Emiliano Brunamonti; Stefano Ferraina; Aldo Genovesio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Adult cleaner wrasse outperform capuchin monkeys, chimpanzees and orang-utans in a complex foraging task derived from cleaner--client reef fish cooperation.

Authors:  Lucie H Salwiczek; Laurent Prétôt; Lanila Demarta; Darby Proctor; Jennifer Essler; Ana I Pinto; Sharon Wismer; Tara Stoinski; Sarah F Brosnan; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.