BACKGROUND: Biomechanical stresses play an important role in determining plaque stability. Quantification of these simulated stresses can be potentially used to assess plaque vulnerability and differentiate different patient groups. METHODS AND RESULTS: 54 asymptomatic and 45 acutely symptomatic patients underwent in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the carotid arteries. Plaque geometry used for nite element analysis was derived from in vivo MRI at the sites of maximum and minimum plaque burden. In total, 198 slices were used for the computational simulations. A pre-shrink technique was used to refine the simulation. Maximum principle stress at the vulnerable plaque sites (ie, critical stress) was extracted for the selected slices and a comparison was performed between the 2 groups. Critical stress in the slice with maximum plaque burden is significantly higher in acutely symptomatic patients as compared to asymptomatic patients (median, inter quartile range: 198.0 kPa (119.8-359.0 kPa) vs 138.4 kPa (83.8-242.6 kPa), P=0.04). No significant difference was found in the slice with minimum plaque burden between the 2 groups (196.7 kPa (133.3-282.7 kPa) vs 182.4 kPa (117.2-310.6 kPa), P=0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Acutely symptomatic carotid plaques have significantly high biomechanical stresses than asymptomatic plaques. This might be potentially useful for establishing a biomechanical risk stratification criteria based on plaque burden in future studies.
BACKGROUND: Biomechanical stresses play an important role in determining plaque stability. Quantification of these simulated stresses can be potentially used to assess plaque vulnerability and differentiate different patient groups. METHODS AND RESULTS: 54 asymptomatic and 45 acutely symptomatic patients underwent in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the carotid arteries. Plaque geometry used for nite element analysis was derived from in vivo MRI at the sites of maximum and minimum plaque burden. In total, 198 slices were used for the computational simulations. A pre-shrink technique was used to refine the simulation. Maximum principle stress at the vulnerable plaque sites (ie, critical stress) was extracted for the selected slices and a comparison was performed between the 2 groups. Critical stress in the slice with maximum plaque burden is significantly higher in acutely symptomatic patients as compared to asymptomatic patients (median, inter quartile range: 198.0 kPa (119.8-359.0 kPa) vs 138.4 kPa (83.8-242.6 kPa), P=0.04). No significant difference was found in the slice with minimum plaque burden between the 2 groups (196.7 kPa (133.3-282.7 kPa) vs 182.4 kPa (117.2-310.6 kPa), P=0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Acutely symptomatic carotid plaques have significantly high biomechanical stresses than asymptomatic plaques. This might be potentially useful for establishing a biomechanical risk stratification criteria based on plaque burden in future studies.
Authors: Qingyu Wang; Dalin Tang; Liang Wang; Gador Canton; Zheyang Wu; Thomas S Hatsukami; Kristen L Billiar; Chun Yuan Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2019-07-04 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Xueying Huang; Chun Yang; Jie Zheng; Richard Bach; David Muccigrosso; Pamela K Woodard; Dalin Tang Journal: J Biomech Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Jianmin Yuan; Zhongzhao Teng; Jiaxuan Feng; Yongxue Zhang; Adam J Brown; Jonathan H Gillard; Zaiping Jing; Qingsheng Lu Journal: Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 2.747
Authors: Yuan Huang; Zhongzhao Teng; Umar Sadat; Jing He; Martin J Graves; Jonathan H Gillard Journal: Biomed Eng Online Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 2.819
Authors: Yuan Huang; Zhongzhao Teng; Umar Sadat; Martin J Graves; Martin R Bennett; Jonathan H Gillard Journal: J Biomech Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Liang Wang; Jie Zheng; Akiko Maehara; Chun Yang; Kristen L Billiar; Zheyang Wu; Richard Bach; David Muccigrosso; Gary S Mintz; Dalin Tang Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 4.475