Literature DB >> 20833386

Change in spine height measurements following sustained mid-range and end-range flexion of the lumbar spine.

Dale A Gerke1, Jean-Michel Brismée, Phillip S Sizer, Gregory S Dedrick, C Roger James.   

Abstract

Workers lose height during the day. Flexion-based exercises and body positions are commonly prescribed to unload the spine and prevent back pain. Lumbar extension positions have been researched and result in an increase in spine height. End-range lumbar extension postures increase spine height to a greater extent than mid-range lumbar extension postures, but these positions are not always tolerated by patients with lumbar conditions. No study to date has investigated the effect of end-range versus mid-range lumbar flexion postures on spine height changes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of two techniques commonly used in clinical settings to unload the lumbar intervertebral disc (IVD) segments through increasing spine height in: (1) a sidelying mid-range lumbar flexion position; and (2) a sidelying end-range lumbar flexion position. A total of 20 asymptomatic women and 21 asymptomatic men with a mean age of 23.8 years (±2.5) participated in the study. Subjects were randomized systematically into 2 groups to determine the order of testing position. Measurements were taken with a stadiometer in the sitting position to detect change in spine height after each position. Results of the paired t-tests indicated that compared to the spine height in sitting, the sidelying end-range lumbar flexion position resulted in a statistically significant (p < .001) mean spine height gain of 4.78 mm (±4.01) while the sidelying mid-range lumbar flexion position resulted in a statistically significant (p < .001) mean spine height gain of 5.84 mm (±4.4). No significant difference between the height changes observed following the two sidelying positions was found (p = .22). Sidelying lumbar flexion positions offer valuable alternatives to lumbar extension positions to increase spine height, possibly through increasing hydration levels of the lumbar IVD and could be proposed as techniques to offset spinal shrinkage and the biomechanical consequences of sustained loads.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20833386     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  4 in total

1.  Calculation of corrected body height in idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of four methods.

Authors:  Marcin Tyrakowski; Tomasz Kotwicki; Jaroslaw Czubak; Kris Siemionow
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Conservative management of a 31 year old male with left sided low back and leg pain: a case report.

Authors:  Emily R Howell
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2012-09

3.  Use of machine learning to select texture features in investigating the effects of axial loading on T2-maps from magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar discs.

Authors:  Vahid Abdollah; Eric C Parent; Samin Dolatabadi; Erica Marr; Keith Wachowicz; Michele Battié
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 2.721

4.  Characteristics of lumbar disc herniation with exacerbation of presentation due to spinal manipulative therapy.

Authors:  Sheng-Li Huang; Yan-Xi Liu; Guo-Lian Yuan; Ji Zhang; Hong-Wei Yan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.