Literature DB >> 20833194

Auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in humans: dissociating detection and spatial discrimination.

Holger F Sperdin1, Céline Cappe, Micah M Murray.   

Abstract

Simple reaction times (RTs) to auditory-somatosensory (AS) multisensory stimuli are facilitated over their unisensory counterparts both when stimuli are delivered to the same location and when separated. In two experiments we addressed the possibility that top-down and/or task-related influences can dynamically impact the spatial representations mediating these effects and the extent to which multisensory facilitation will be observed. Participants performed a simple detection task in response to auditory, somatosensory, or simultaneous AS stimuli that in turn were either spatially aligned or misaligned by lateralizing the stimuli. Additionally, we also informed the participants that they would be retrogradely queried (one-third of trials) regarding the side where a given stimulus in a given sensory modality was presented. In this way, we sought to have participants attending to all possible spatial locations and sensory modalities, while nonetheless having them perform a simple detection task. Experiment 1 provided no cues prior to stimulus delivery. Experiment 2 included spatially uninformative cues (50% of trials). In both experiments, multisensory conditions significantly facilitated detection RTs with no evidence for differences according to spatial alignment (though general benefits of cuing were observed in Experiment 2). Facilitated detection occurs even when attending to spatial information. Performance with probes, quantified using sensitivity (d'), was impaired following multisensory trials in general and significantly more so following misaligned multisensory trials. This indicates that spatial information is not available, despite being task-relevant. The collective results support a model wherein early AS interactions may result in a loss of spatial acuity for unisensory information.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20833194     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  7 in total

1.  Perceptuo-motor compatibility governs multisensory integration in bimanual coordination dynamics.

Authors:  Gregory Zelic; Denis Mottet; Julien Lagarde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Segregated audio-tactile events destabilize the bimanual coordination of distinct rhythms.

Authors:  Julien Lagarde; Gregory Zelic; Denis Mottet
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Multisensory integration: flexible use of general operations.

Authors:  Nienke van Atteveldt; Micah M Murray; Gregor Thut; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Deconstructing multisensory enhancement in detection.

Authors:  Mario Pannunzi; Alexis Pérez-Bellido; Alexandre Pereda-Baños; Joan López-Moliner; Gustavo Deco; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Cross-modal effects in speech perception.

Authors:  Megan Keough; Donald Derrick; Bryan Gick
Journal:  Annu Rev Linguist       Date:  2018-08-01

6.  Audio-visual spatial alignment improves integration in the presence of a competing audio-visual stimulus.

Authors:  Justin T Fleming; Abigail L Noyce; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Behavioral impact of unisensory and multisensory audio-tactile events: pros and cons for interlimb coordination in juggling.

Authors:  Gregory Zelic; Denis Mottet; Julien Lagarde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.