Literature DB >> 20832328

Panel and patient perceptions of nasal aesthetics after secondary cleft rhinoplasty with versus without columellar grafting.

Poramate Pitak-Arnnop1, Alexander Hemprich, Kittipong Dhanuthai, Vedat Yildirim, Niels Christian Pausch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cleft-lip nasal deformity alters patient's self-image, as well as posing unique challenges for the rhinoplastic surgeon.
OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this study was to compare the panel perceptions of nasal aesthetics following secondary cleft rhinoplasty with versus without caudal septal extension grafting (columella grafting). We also investigated whether patient's self-assessment and satisfaction correlated with 4 other variables: (1) rhinoplasty techniques; (2) patients' age; (3) patients' gender; and (4) panel perceptions.
METHODS: Using a cross-sectional study design, we enrolled a sample of adult laypersons and medical experts. The predictor variable was the rhinoplasty techniques (with/without columellar grafting). The outcome variable was the panel rankings of nasal aesthetics based on the photographs of 50 nonsyndromic cleft patients before and after the rhinoplasty. Other variables included the patient's subjective assessment and satisfaction, demographic and anatomic variables. Appropriate descriptive, uni- and bivariate statistics were calculated. The significance level was set at P≤0.05 and <0.05 for single- and two-tailed tests of hypothesis, respectively.
RESULTS: The sample consisted of 507 laypersons and 51 professionals who gave comparative ratings (P>0.05). Columellar grafting was associated with higher rankings of postoperative nasal aesthetics (P =0.04). Most of the patients (90%) rated positive outcomes. Surgical techniques, patients' age and gender, and panel perceptions were not individually significantly associated with subjective measures and satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that caudal septal extension grafting improves the nasal aesthetics of the cleft patients, as judged by the panel. Patient's self-assessment seems unreliable to be used as an outcome measure. 2010 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20832328     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  13 in total

1.  Nasal appearance after secondary cleft rhinoplasty: comparison of professional rating with patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Niels Christian Pausch; Carolin Unger; Poramate Pitak-Arnnop; Keskanya Subbalekha
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-04-22

2.  Factors associated with postrhinoplasty mucous cyst in cleft lip patients.

Authors:  Niels Christian Pausch; Dirk Halama; Kittipong Dhanuthai; Keskanya Subbalekha; Jörg Hendricks
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-05-30

3.  Psychosocial acceptance of cleft patients: has something changed?

Authors:  Niels Christian Pausch; Karsten Winter; Dirk Halama; Christian Wirtz; Vedat Yildirim; Nattapong Sirintawat; Sirintawat Nattapong
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-07-28

4.  Esthetic, Functional, and Everyday Life Assessment of Individuals with Cleft Lip and/or Palate.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gkantidis; Despina A Papamanou; Marina Karamolegkou; Domna Dorotheou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Secondary correction of nasal deformities in cleft lip and palate patients: surgical technique and outcome evaluation.

Authors:  Gabor Vass; Gabor Mohos; Zsofia Bere; Laszlo Ivan; Janos Varga; Jozsef Piffko; Laszlo Rovo
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  The effects of Y-shaped conchal cartilage transplantation on the correction of nasal deformity secondary to cleft lip and its influence on mental health.

Authors:  Ling Liu; Wei Wang; Lin Yang; Hongchuang Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Evaluation of facial appearance in patients with repaired cleft lip and palate: comparing the assessment of laypeople and healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Samar Alhayek; Mohammed Alsalem; Yazeed Alotaibi; Aamir Omair
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-02-06

8.  Radiofrequency: the next step for gingival depigmentation.

Authors:  Poramate Pitak-Arnnop; Kittipong Dhanuthai; Niels Christian Pausch
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2013-01

9.  Developing a visual rating chart for the esthetic outcome of unilateral cleft lip and palate repair.

Authors:  A Olusanya Adeola; A Akadiri Oladimeji
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

10.  Appearance and Speech Satisfaction and Their Associations With Psychosocial Difficulties Among Young People With Cleft Lip and/or Palate.

Authors:  Sarah N Kelly; Joanna Shearer
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2020-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.