Literature DB >> 20832324

Lumbar microdiscectomy under epidural anaesthesia with the patient in the sitting position: a prospective study.

Nicola Nicassio1, Paolo Bobicchio, Marzia Umari, Leonello Tacconi.   

Abstract

In a prospective study we compared the surgical outcome, length of hospital stay, complications and patient satisfaction for patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy (LM) under spinal anaesthesia (SA) in the sitting position (23 patients) to those of another cohort who underwent LM under general anaesthesia (GA) in the prone or genu-pectoral position during the same time period (238 patients). We aimed to determine: (i) if epidural anaesthesia is safe for lumbar microdiscectomy; and (ii) if placing the patient in a sitting position confers an advantage in performing the operation. For all patients we calculated the time from the end of the operation to the first spontaneous urination and to the first administration of analgesic drugs. Before being discharged, patients were asked to give an opinion on the quality of analgesia obtained by epidural anaesthesia and on the sitting position used. No patient had any complications linked to epidural anaesthesia and only one patient experienced a small dural tear as a surgical complication. Twenty of 23 patients expressed satisfaction with the level of analgesia obtained and only three considered it poor. All patients found the sitting position comfortable. Advantages of the sitting position for surgery include better comfort for the patient, potential to recreate a load condition similar to the one that takes place during orthostasis and a "cleaner" operative field that uses gravity to drain blood. Of greatest concern is the possibility of the patient developing a dural tear and subsequent leaking of cerebrospinal fluid, which could also be a source of surgical complications. Currently, epidural anaesthesia allows a reduction in anaesthetic and surgical times, anaesthetic complications and, consequently, hospitalization period. Further analysis of the sitting position for the patient during surgery is required to fully assess the advantages and disadvantages of this method.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20832324     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.04.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  5 in total

1.  Regional anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia techniques for spine surgery - a review.

Authors:  Najoua Mokraï Benyahia; Ann Verster; Vera Saldien; Margaretha Breebaart; Luc Sermeus; Marcel Vercauteren
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2015-04

Review 2.  Perioperative outcomes of general versus spinal anesthesia in the lumbar spine surgery population: A systematic review and meta-analysis of data from 2005 through 2021.

Authors:  David Urick; Brandon Sciavolino; Timothy Y Wang; Dhanesh K Gupta; Alok Sharan; Muhammed M Abd-El-Barr
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 3.  Awake spine surgery: An eye-opening movement.

Authors:  Brian Fiani; Taylor Reardon; Jacob Selvage; Alden Dahan; Mohamed H El-Farra; Philine Endres; Taha Taka; Yasmine Suliman; Alexander Rose
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-05-10

4.  Complication rate during multilevel lumbar fusion in patients above 60 years.

Authors:  Bijjawara Mahesh; Bidre Upendra; S Vijay; Gc Arun Kumar; Srinivas Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Under General and Local Anesthesia: A Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Talgat Kerimbayev; Yergen Kenzhegulov; Zhandos Tuigynov; Viktor Aleinikov; Yermek Urunbayev; Yerbol Makhambetov; Andrew Pan; Nurzhan Abishev; Meirzhan Oshayev; Dinara Baiskhanova; Makar Solodovnikov; Serik Akshulakov
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.