INTRODUCTION: This study examined whether prenatal perceived stress levels during pregnancy were associated with preterm labor or preterm birth. METHODS: Perceived stress levels were measured at 16 weeks' gestation or less and between 20 and 24 weeks' gestation in a sample of 1069 low-income pregnant women attending Temple University prenatal care clinics. Scores were averaged to create a single measure of prenatal stress. Preterm birth was defined as the occurrence of a spontaneous birth prior to 37 weeks' gestation. Preterm labor was defined as the occurrence of regular contractions between 20 and 37 weeks' gestation that were associated with changes in the cervix. RESULTS: Independent of potential confounding factors, prenatal perceived stress was not associated with preterm labor (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.78; P = .66); however, prenatal stress trended toward an association with preterm birth (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.00-2.23; P = .05). The strongest predictor of preterm labor was a history of preterm labor in a prior pregnancy. Women with a history of preterm labor were 2 times more likely to experience preterm labor in the current pregnancy than women who did not have a preterm labor history (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.05-4.41; P = .04). Historical risk factors for preterm birth, such as African American race, a history of abortion, or a history of preterm birth, were not related to preterm labor. The strongest predictor of preterm birth was having a history of preterm birth in a prior pregnancy (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.54-4.24; P < .001). DISCUSSION: Prenatal perceived stress levels may be a risk factor for preterm birth independent of preterm labor; however, prenatal stress was not associated with preterm labor. Risk factors for preterm labor may be different from those of preterm birth.
INTRODUCTION: This study examined whether prenatal perceived stress levels during pregnancy were associated with preterm labor or preterm birth. METHODS: Perceived stress levels were measured at 16 weeks' gestation or less and between 20 and 24 weeks' gestation in a sample of 1069 low-income pregnant women attending Temple University prenatal care clinics. Scores were averaged to create a single measure of prenatal stress. Preterm birth was defined as the occurrence of a spontaneous birth prior to 37 weeks' gestation. Preterm labor was defined as the occurrence of regular contractions between 20 and 37 weeks' gestation that were associated with changes in the cervix. RESULTS: Independent of potential confounding factors, prenatal perceived stress was not associated with preterm labor (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.78; P = .66); however, prenatal stress trended toward an association with preterm birth (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.00-2.23; P = .05). The strongest predictor of preterm labor was a history of preterm labor in a prior pregnancy. Women with a history of preterm labor were 2 times more likely to experience preterm labor in the current pregnancy than women who did not have a preterm labor history (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.05-4.41; P = .04). Historical risk factors for preterm birth, such as African American race, a history of abortion, or a history of preterm birth, were not related to preterm labor. The strongest predictor of preterm birth was having a history of preterm birth in a prior pregnancy (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.54-4.24; P < .001). DISCUSSION: Prenatal perceived stress levels may be a risk factor for preterm birth independent of preterm labor; however, prenatal stress was not associated with preterm labor. Risk factors for preterm labor may be different from those of preterm birth.
Authors: R L Copper; R L Goldenberg; A Das; N Elder; M Swain; G Norman; R Ramsey; P Cotroneo; B A Collins; F Johnson; P Jones; A M Meier Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1996-11 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: K M Paarlberg; A J Vingerhoets; J Passchier; A G Heinen; G A Dekker; H P van Geijn Journal: J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 2.949
Authors: Joyce A Martin; Hsiang-Ching Kung; T J Mathews; Donna L Hoyert; Donna M Strobino; Bernard Guyer; Shae R Sutton Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Sixto E Sanchez; Gabriella C Puente; Guillermo Atencio; Chungfang Qiu; David Yanez; Bizu Gelaye; Michelle A Williams Journal: J Reprod Med Date: 2013 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 0.142
Authors: Heather H Burris; Valerie M Riis; Isabel Schmidt; Kristin D Gerson; Amy Brown; Michal A Elovitz Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM Date: 2020-02-10
Authors: Kristin D Gerson; Clare Mccarthy; Jacques Ravel; Michal A Elovitz; Heather H Burris Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Anisma R Gokoel; Wilco C W R Zijlmans; Hannah H Covert; Firoz Abdoel Wahid; Arti Shankar; M Sigrid MacDonald-Ottevanger; Ashna D Hindori-Mohangoo; Jeffrey K Wickliffe; Maureen Y Lichtveld; Emily W Harville Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-20 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Maryam Nesari; Joanne K Olson; Ben Vandermeer; Linda Slater; David M Olson Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 3.007