Literature DB >> 20830540

Quantitative evaluation of expression difference in report assignments between nursing and radiologic technology departments.

Naoki Nishimoto1, Yuki Yokooka, Ayako Yagahara, Masahito Uesugi, Katsuhiko Ogasawara.   

Abstract

Our purpose in this study was to investigate the expression differences in report assignments between students in nursing and radiologic technology departments. We have known that faculties could identify differences, such as word usage, through grading their students' assignments. However, there are no reports in the literature dealing with expression differences in vocabulary usage in medical informatics education based on statistical techniques or other quantitative measures. The report assignment asked for students' opinions in the event that they found a rare case of a disease in a hospital after they graduated from professional school. We processed student report data automatically, and we applied the space vector model and TF/IDF (term frequency/inverse document frequency) scoring to 129 report assignments. The similarity-score distributions among the assignments for these two departments were close to normal. We focused on the sets of terms that occurred exclusively in either department. For terms such as "radiation therapy" or "communication skills" that occurred in the radiologic technology department, the TF/IDF score was 8.01. The same score was obtained for terms such as "privacy guidelines" or "consent of patients" that occurred in the nursing department. These results will help faculties to provide a better education based on identified expression differences from students' background knowledge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20830540     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-010-0102-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  24 in total

1.  Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program.

Authors:  A R Aronson
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

2.  Korean nursing students' ethical problems and ethical decision making.

Authors:  Hyeoun-Ae Park; Miriam E Cameron; Sung-Suk Han; Sung-Hee Ahn; Hyo-Sook Oh; Kyeong-Uoon Kim
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.874

3.  Automated encoding of clinical documents based on natural language processing.

Authors:  Carol Friedman; Lyudmila Shagina; Yves Lussier; George Hripcsak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Mining the biomedical literature in the genomic era: an overview.

Authors:  Hagit Shatkay; Ronen Feldman
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.479

5.  Coding free text radiology reports using the Cancer Text Information Extraction System (caTIES).

Authors:  David Carrell; Diana Miglioretti; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

6.  Natural language processing to identify adverse drug events.

Authors:  Michael Gysbers; Richard Reichley; Peter M Kilbridge; Laura Noirot; Rakesh Nagarajan; W Claiborne Dunagan; Thomas C Bailey
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

7.  Beyond surface characteristics: a new health text-specific readability measurement.

Authors:  Hyeoneui Kim; Sergey Goryachev; Graciela Rosemblat; Allen Browne; Alla Keselman; Qing Zeng-Treitler
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

8.  Nursing ethics and Project 2000.

Authors:  T Hussey
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.187

9.  Practicing invasive procedures on students and patients: an ethical dilemma in nursing education.

Authors:  G Lindseth
Journal:  Nurs Forum       Date:  1994 Jan-Mar

10.  An analysis and evaluation of student nurses' participation in ethical decision making.

Authors:  S S Han; S H Ahn
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.874

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.