Literature DB >> 20830510

Endocrine disruptors provoke differential modulatory responses on androgen receptor and pregnane and xenobiotic receptor: potential implications in metabolic disorders.

Nagendra Kumar Chaturvedi1, Sanjay Kumar, Seema Negi, Rakesh K Tyagi.   

Abstract

A systematic comparison of the impact of some potential endocrine disruptors (EDs) on modulation of androgen receptor (AR) and pregnane and xenobiotic receptor (PXR) function was conducted in a multi-step analysis. Promoter-reporter-based transcription assays were performed in conjunction with receptor dynamic studies in living cells that helped implicating the suspected EDs for their deleterious effects. We demonstrate that most of the selected EDs not only inhibit AR transcriptional activity, but also alter its subcellular dynamics. Conversely, some of these anti-androgenic compounds were potent activator of xeno-sensing nuclear receptor, PXR. Interestingly, agonist-activated AR that associates with the mitotic chromatin fails to achieve this association when bound to anti-androgenic EDs. Conclusively, most EDs (except BCH) behaved like pure antagonist for AR while as agonist for PXR. Subsequent experiments with DDT treatment in mice model indicated that in testis AR and its regulated genes PEM and ODC levels are down-regulated, whereas in liver of same mice PEM is up-regulated while AR and ODC remain unchanged. On the contrary, PXR and its regulated genes CYP3A11 and MDR1 levels in mice liver were up-regulated while in testis PXR remained unchanged, CYP3A11 up-regulated and MDR1 were down-regulated. Based on a novel "Biopit" concept it is speculated that long-term exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals may influence the epigenetic profile of target cells via transcription factors thereby making them vulnerable to onset of chemically induced endocrine-related malignancies or metabolic disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20830510     DOI: 10.1007/s11010-010-0583-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem        ISSN: 0300-8177            Impact factor:   3.396


  93 in total

Review 1.  Cotransfection assays and steroid receptor biology.

Authors:  S Zhang; M Danielsen
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Epigenetics: a landscape takes shape.

Authors:  Aaron D Goldberg; C David Allis; Emily Bernstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Role of exposure to environmental chemicals in the developmental basis of disease and dysfunction.

Authors:  Jerrold J Heindel
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.143

4.  TBP dynamics in living human cells: constitutive association of TBP with mitotic chromosomes.

Authors:  Danyang Chen; Craig S Hinkley; R William Henry; Sui Huang
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Cross-talk between androgen receptor and pregnane and xenobiotic receptor reveals existence of a novel modulatory action of anti-androgenic drugs.

Authors:  Subodh Kumar; Bharti Jaiswal; Sanjay Kumar; Seema Negi; Rakesh K Tyagi
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 6.  Receptor-dependent transcriptional activation of cytochrome P4503A genes: induction mechanisms, species differences and interindividual variation in man.

Authors:  G G Gibson; N J Plant; K E Swales; A Ayrton; W El-Sankary
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.908

7.  Pregnane X Receptor (PXR) expression in colorectal cancer cells restricts irinotecan chemosensitivity through enhanced SN-38 glucuronidation.

Authors:  Caroline Raynal; Jean-Marc Pascussi; Géraldine Leguelinel; Cyril Breuker; Jovana Kantar; Benjamin Lallemant; Sylvain Poujol; Caroline Bonnans; Dominique Joubert; Frédéric Hollande; Serge Lumbroso; Jean-Paul Brouillet; Alexandre Evrard
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 27.401

8.  The orphan nuclear receptor HNF4alpha determines PXR- and CAR-mediated xenobiotic induction of CYP3A4.

Authors:  Rommel G Tirona; Wooin Lee; Brenda F Leake; Lu-Bin Lan; Cynthia Brimer Cline; Vishal Lamba; Fereshteh Parviz; Stephen A Duncan; Yusuke Inoue; Frank J Gonzalez; Erin G Schuetz; Richard B Kim
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2003-01-06       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  A PXR reporter gene assay in a stable cell culture system: CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 induction by pesticides.

Authors:  Géraldine Lemaire; Georges de Sousa; Roger Rahmani
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 5.858

10.  The nuclear receptors constitutive androstane receptor and pregnane X receptor cross-talk with hepatic nuclear factor 4alpha to synergistically activate the human CYP2C9 promoter.

Authors:  Yuping Chen; Grace Kissling; Masahiko Negishi; Joyce A Goldstein
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  15 in total

1.  Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  E Christina Persson; Barry I Graubard; Alison A Evans; W Thomas London; Jean-Philippe Weber; Alain LeBlanc; Gang Chen; Wenyao Lin; Katherine A McGlynn
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Nuclear localization signal region in nuclear receptor PXR governs the receptor association with mitotic chromatin.

Authors:  Manjul Rana; Amit K Dash; Kalaiarasan Ponnusamy; Rakesh K Tyagi
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  Pregnane xenobiotic receptor in cancer pathogenesis and therapeutic response.

Authors:  Satyanarayana R Pondugula; Sridhar Mani
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 8.679

4.  Cross-talk between the androgen receptor and the liver X receptor: implications for cholesterol homeostasis.

Authors:  James Robert Krycer; Andrew John Brown
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Hepatocellular carcinoma and the risk of occupational exposure.

Authors:  Venerando Rapisarda; Carla Loreto; Michele Malaguarnera; Annalisa Ardiri; Maria Proiti; Giuseppe Rigano; Evelise Frazzetto; Maria Irene Ruggeri; Giulia Malaguarnera; Nicoletta Bertino; Mariano Malaguarnera; Vito Emanuele Catania; Isidoro Di Carlo; Adriana Toro; Emanuele Bertino; Dario Mangano; Gaetano Bertino
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-08

6.  Potential influence of the phthalates on normal liver function and cardiometabolic risk in males.

Authors:  Nataša Milošević; Nataša Milić; Dragana Živanović Bosić; Ivana Bajkin; Ivanka Perčić; Ludovico Abenavoli; Milica Medić Stojanoska
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Novel Application of Red Fluorescent Protein (DsRed-Express) for the Study of Functional Dynamics of Nuclear Receptors.

Authors:  Amit K Dash; Ashutosh S Yende; Rakesh K Tyagi
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 8.  Multigenerational and transgenerational effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals: A role for altered epigenetic regulation?

Authors:  Frances Xin; Martha Susiarjo; Marisa S Bartolomei
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 9.  The influence of phthalates and bisphenol A on the obesity development and glucose metabolism disorders.

Authors:  Milica Medic Stojanoska; Natasa Milosevic; Natasa Milic; Ludovico Abenavoli
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.633

10.  Prenatal exposure to the pesticide DDT and hypertension diagnosed in women before age 50: a longitudinal birth cohort study.

Authors:  Michele La Merrill; Piera M Cirillo; Mary Beth Terry; Nickilou Y Krigbaum; Julie D Flom; Barbara A Cohn
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.