BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Renal function is an important predictor of survival in cirrhosis and liver transplantation. GFR estimates using serum cystatin C (CysC) are proposed as better predictors of renal function than ones on the basis of serum creatinine (Cr). Our aims were: (1) evaluate correlations between serum CysC and different methods of creatinine measurements; (2) compare CysC and Cr GFR formulas with (51)Cr-EDTA; and (3) evaluate liver-related parameters potentially influencing GFR. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: 254 blood samples in 65 patients with cirrhosis correlating CysC with four Cr methods were used; another 74 patients comparing (51)Cr-EDTA GFR to Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Larsson and Hoek formulas for CysC were also included. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots and concordance correlation coefficients. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used for GFR predictors. RESULTS: Serum CysC correlated modestly with O'Leary modified Jaffe, compensated kinetic Jaffe, enzymatic creatinine, and standard kinetic Jaffe 0.72/0.71/0.72/0.72 (all P < 0.001). Bland-Altman agreement with (51)Cr-EDTA GFR was poor; the best agreement was Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (concordance 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.71); the worst agreement was the Hoek formula (concordance 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.61). A new GFR formula including the Child-Pugh score improved the accuracy of Cr GFR formulas compared with (51)Cr-EDTA GFR. CONCLUSIONS: Estimated GFR in cirrhosis is not better with CysC formulas compared with creatinine ones: specific formulas may be necessary.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Renal function is an important predictor of survival in cirrhosis and liver transplantation. GFR estimates using serum cystatin C (CysC) are proposed as better predictors of renal function than ones on the basis of serum creatinine (Cr). Our aims were: (1) evaluate correlations between serum CysC and different methods of creatinine measurements; (2) compare CysC and Cr GFR formulas with (51)Cr-EDTA; and (3) evaluate liver-related parameters potentially influencing GFR. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: 254 blood samples in 65 patients with cirrhosis correlating CysC with four Cr methods were used; another 74 patients comparing (51)Cr-EDTA GFR to Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Larsson and Hoek formulas for CysC were also included. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots and concordance correlation coefficients. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used for GFR predictors. RESULTS: Serum CysC correlated modestly with O'Leary modified Jaffe, compensated kinetic Jaffe, enzymatic creatinine, and standard kinetic Jaffe 0.72/0.71/0.72/0.72 (all P < 0.001). Bland-Altman agreement with (51)Cr-EDTA GFR was poor; the best agreement was Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (concordance 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.71); the worst agreement was the Hoek formula (concordance 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.61). A new GFR formula including the Child-Pugh score improved the accuracy of Cr GFR formulas compared with (51)Cr-EDTA GFR. CONCLUSIONS: Estimated GFR in cirrhosis is not better with CysC formulas compared with creatinine ones: specific formulas may be necessary.
Authors: Thomas A Gonwa; Linda Jennings; Martin L Mai; Paul C Stark; Andrew S Levey; Goran B Klintmalm Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: A Cárdenas; P Ginès; J Uriz; X Bessa; J M Salmerón; A Mas; R Ortega; B Calahorra; D De Las Heras; J Bosch; V Arroyo; J Rodés Journal: Hepatology Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Carol Goulding; Evangelous Cholongitas; Devi Nair; Andrew Kerry; David Patch; Murat Akyol; Simon Walker; Derek Manas; David Mc Clure; Liesl Smith; Neville Jamieson; Ingela Oberg; David Cartwright; Andrew K Burroughs Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2009-11-05 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Carl Adam Wesolowski; Lin Ling; Elias Xirouchakis; Maria T Burniston; Richard C Puetter; Paul S Babyn; Ioannis G Giamalis; Andrew K Burroughs Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 9.236