Literature DB >> 20828897

Intraoperative impaction of total knee replacements: an explicit finite-element-analysis of principal stresses in ceramic vs. cobalt-chromium femoral components.

Daniel Kluess1, Wolfram Mittelmeier, Rainer Bader.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In connection with technological advances in the manufacturing of medical ceramics, a newly developed ceramic femoral component was introduced in total knee arthroplasty. We generated an explicit finite-element-model to calculate the stresses developed under the highly dynamic intraoperative impaction with regard to cobalt-chromium and ceramic implant material as well as application of a silicone cover in order to reduce stress.
METHODS: The impaction was calculated with the hammer hitting the backside of the impactor at previously measured initial velocities. Subsequently the impactor, consisting of a steel handhold and a polyoxymethylene head, hit the femoral component. Instead of modelling femoral bone, the implant was mounted on four spring elements with spring constants previously determined in an experimental impaction model. The maximum principal stresses in the implants were evaluated at 8000 increments during the first 4 ms of impact.
FINDINGS: The ceramic implant showed principal stresses 10% to 48% higher than the cobalt chromium femoral component. The simulation of a 5mm thick silicone layer between the impactor and the femoral component showed a strong decrease of vibration resulting in a reduction of 54% to 68% of the maximum stress amounts. The calculated amounts of principal stress were beneath the ultimate bending strengths of each material.
INTERPRETATION: Based on the results, intraoperative fracture of femoral components in total knee replacement may not be caused solely by impaction, but also by contributing geometrical factors such as inadequate preparation of the distal femur. In order to minimize the influence of impaction related stress peaks we recommend limiting the velocity as well as the weight of the impaction hammer when inserting femoral components. The silicone cover seems to deliver a strong decrease of implant stress and should be considered in surgery technique in the future.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20828897     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  4 in total

1.  Intraoperative assessment of resected condyle thickness in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song; Kyoung Ho Yoon; Jung Ho Noh; Chul Hee Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Metal hypersensitivity and metal ion levels in patients with coated or uncoated total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Jörg Lützner; Albrecht Hartmann; Gerd Dinnebier; Petra Spornraft-Ragaller; Christine Hamann; Stephan Kirschner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Similar outcome during short-term follow-up after coated and uncoated total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Anne Postler; Franziska Beyer; Cornelia Lützner; Eric Tille; Jörg Lützner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Ceramic femoral components in total knee arthroplasty - two year follow-up results of an international prospective multi-centre study.

Authors:  Philipp Bergschmidt; Rainer Bader; Dirk Ganzer; Christian Hauzeur; Christoph Lohmann; Wolfgang Rüther; Domenico Tigani; Nicola Rani; Fernando Lopez Prats; Claudio Zorzi; Vincenzo Madonna; Stefano Rigotti; Francesco Benazzo; Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi; Guenther Kundt; Hans Rudolf Bloch; Wolfram Mittelmeier
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-04-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.