OBJECTIVE: Examine the influences of race, socioeconomic status, sex, and age on barriers to participation in a study of cross-sectional differences and longitudinal changes in health-related outcomes. METHODS: We designed a multidisciplinary, community-based, prospective longitudinal epidemiologic study among socioeconomically diverse African Americans and Whites. We recruited 3722 participants from Baltimore, Md. with a mean age of 47.7 (range 30-64) years, 45% males; 2200 African Americans (59%) and 1522 whites (41%); 41% reported household incomes below the 125% poverty delimiter. RESULTS: There were no significant age differences associated with sex or race. Participants below the 125% poverty delimiter were slightly younger than those above the delimiter. Age, race, and sex, but not poverty status, were associated with the likelihood of a physical examination. Older participants, women, and Whites were more likely to complete their examinations. Among those who completed their examinations, there were no age differences associated with sex and poverty status, but African Americans were negligibly younger than Whites. CONCLUSIONS: Although some literature suggests that minorities and low-income people are less willing to participate in clinical research, these baseline data suggest that African Americans individuals and individuals from households with incomes below 125% of the poverty level are at least as willing to participate in observational clinical studies as Whites and higher income individuals of similar age and sex.
OBJECTIVE: Examine the influences of race, socioeconomic status, sex, and age on barriers to participation in a study of cross-sectional differences and longitudinal changes in health-related outcomes. METHODS: We designed a multidisciplinary, community-based, prospective longitudinal epidemiologic study among socioeconomically diverse African Americans and Whites. We recruited 3722 participants from Baltimore, Md. with a mean age of 47.7 (range 30-64) years, 45% males; 2200 African Americans (59%) and 1522 whites (41%); 41% reported household incomes below the 125% poverty delimiter. RESULTS: There were no significant age differences associated with sex or race. Participants below the 125% poverty delimiter were slightly younger than those above the delimiter. Age, race, and sex, but not poverty status, were associated with the likelihood of a physical examination. Older participants, women, and Whites were more likely to complete their examinations. Among those who completed their examinations, there were no age differences associated with sex and poverty status, but African Americans were negligibly younger than Whites. CONCLUSIONS: Although some literature suggests that minorities and low-income people are less willing to participate in clinical research, these baseline data suggest that African Americans individuals and individuals from households with incomes below 125% of the poverty level are at least as willing to participate in observational clinical studies as Whites and higher income individuals of similar age and sex.
Authors: Laurie M Anderson; Joseph St Charles; Mindy T Fullilove; Susan C Scrimshaw; Jonathan E Fielding; Jacques Normand Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Julian F Thayer; Marcellus M Merritt; John J Sollers; Alan B Zonderman; Michele K Evans; Sue Yie; Darrell R Abernethy Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Nancy S Sung; William F Crowley; Myron Genel; Patricia Salber; Lewis Sandy; Louis M Sherwood; Stephen B Johnson; Veronica Catanese; Hugh Tilson; Kenneth Getz; Elaine L Larson; David Scheinberg; E Albert Reece; Harold Slavkin; Adrian Dobs; Jack Grebb; Rick A Martinez; Allan Korn; David Rimoin Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-03-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Angela R Burroughs; Wendy A Visscher; Thomas L Haney; Jaye R Efland; John C Barefoot; Redford B Williams; Ilene C Siegler Journal: J Community Health Date: 2003-12
Authors: Andrzej R Trzeciak; Joy G Mohanty; Kimberly D Jacob; Janice Barnes; Ngozi Ejiogu; Althaf Lohani; Alan B Zonderman; Joseph M Rifkind; Michele K Evans Journal: Mutat Res Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 2.433
Authors: Alyssa A Gamaldo; Jessica M McNeely; Mauli T Shah; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Daniel K Leibel; Danielle Shaked; Danielle L Beatty Moody; Hans B Liu; Nan-Ping Weng; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman; Shari R Waldstein Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: May A Beydoun; Sharmin Hossain; Marie T Fanelli-Kuczmarski; Hind A Beydoun; Jose-Atilio Canas; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Danielle Shaked; Leslie I Katzel; Stephen L Seliger; Rao P Gullapalli; Christos Davatzikos; Guray Erus; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman; Shari R Waldstein Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Félice Lê-Scherban; Allison B Brenner; Margaret T Hicken; Belinda L Needham; Teresa Seeman; Richard P Sloan; Xu Wang; Ana V Diez Roux Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2018 Feb/Mar Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: May A Beydoun; Marie T Fanelli-Kuczmarski; Hind A Beydoun; Greg A Dore; Jose A Canas; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Deidra C Crews; Marie Fanelli Kuczmarski; Vanessa Grubbs; Elizabeth Hedgeman; Vahakn B Shahinian; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman; Nilka Rios Burrows; Desmond E Williams; Rajiv Saran; Neil R Powe Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2014-01-08 Impact factor: 3.754