Literature DB >> 20826334

Systematic bioinformatics and experimental validation of yeast complexes reduces the rate of attrition during structural investigations.

Mark A Brooks1, Kamil Gewartowski, Eirini Mitsiki, Juliette Létoquart, Roland A Pache, Ysaline Billier, Michela Bertero, Margot Corréa, Mariusz Czarnocki-Cieciura, Michal Dadlez, Véronique Henriot, Noureddine Lazar, Lila Delbos, Dorothée Lebert, Jan Piwowarski, Pascal Rochaix, Bettina Böttcher, Luis Serrano, Bertrand Séraphin, Herman van Tilbeurgh, Patrick Aloy, Anastassis Perrakis, Andrzej Dziembowski.   

Abstract

For high-throughput structural studies of protein complexes of composition inferred from proteomics data, it is crucial that candidate complexes are selected accurately. Herein, we exemplify a procedure that combines a bioinformatics tool for complex selection with in vivo validation, to deliver structural results in a medium-throughout manner. We have selected a set of 20 yeast complexes, which were predicted to be feasible by either an automated bioinformatics algorithm, by manual inspection of primary data, or by literature searches. These complexes were validated with two straightforward and efficient biochemical assays, and heterologous expression technologies of complex components were then used to produce the complexes to assess their feasibility experimentally. Approximately one-half of the selected complexes were useful for structural studies, and we detail one particular success story. Our results underscore the importance of accurate target selection and validation in avoiding transient, unstable, or simply nonexistent complexes from the outset.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20826334     DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2010.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Structure        ISSN: 0969-2126            Impact factor:   5.006


  7 in total

1.  Tfb6, a previously unidentified subunit of the general transcription factor TFIIH, facilitates dissociation of Ssl2 helicase after transcription initiation.

Authors:  Kenji Murakami; Brian J Gibbons; Ralph E Davis; Shigeki Nagai; Xin Liu; Philip J J Robinson; Tinghe Wu; Craig D Kaplan; Roger D Kornberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  From systems to structure: bridging networks and mechanism.

Authors:  James S Fraser; John D Gross; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Affinity resins containing enzymatically resistant mRNA cap analogs--a new tool for the analysis of cap-binding proteins.

Authors:  Sylwia Anna Szczepaniak; Joanna Zuberek; Edward Darzynkiewicz; Joanna Kufel; Jacek Jemielity
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 4.942

4.  CoESPRIT: a library-based construct screening method for identification and expression of soluble protein complexes.

Authors:  Yingfeng An; Patrick Meresse; Philippe J Mas; Darren J Hart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Molecular basis for inner kinetochore configuration through RWD domain-peptide interactions.

Authors:  Florian Schmitzberger; Magdalena M Richter; Yuliya Gordiyenko; Carol V Robinson; Michał Dadlez; Stefan Westermann
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Protein flexibility, not disorder, is intrinsic to molecular recognition.

Authors:  Joël Janin; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2013-01-11

7.  Increasing the precision of orthology-based complex prediction through network alignment.

Authors:  Roland A Pache; Patrick Aloy
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.