Literature DB >> 20825807

Is ED disposition associated with intracerebral hemorrhage mortality?

Opeolu Adeoye1, Mary Haverbusch, Daniel Woo, Padmini Sekar, Charles J Moomaw, Dawn Kleindorfer, Brian Stettler, Brett M Kissela, Joseph P Broderick, Matthew L Flaherty.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early deterioration is common in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Treatment at tertiary care centers has been associated with lower ICH mortality. Guidelines recommend aggressive care for 24 hours irrespective of the initial outlook. We examined the frequency of and factors associated with transfer to tertiary centers in ICH patients who initially presented at nontertiary emergency departments (EDs). We also compared observed with expected mortality in transferred and nontransferred patients using published short-term mortality predictors for ICH.
METHODS: Adult patients who resided in a 5-county region and presented to nontertiary EDs with nontraumatic ICH in 2005 were identified. Intracerebral hemorrhage score and ICH Grading Scale (ICH-GS) were determined. Of 16 local hospitals, 2 were designated tertiary care centers. Logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with transfer.
RESULTS: Of 205 ICH patients who presented to nontertiary EDs, 80 (39.0%) were transferred to a tertiary center. In multivariate regression, better baseline function (modified Rankin scale 0-2 versus 3-5; odds ratio, 0.42, 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.85, P = .016) and black race (odds ratio, 2.28, 95% confidence interval 1.01-5.12, P = .046) were associated with transfer. A trend toward higher 30-day mortality was observed in nontransferred patients (32.5% versus 45.6%, P = .06). The ICH-GS overestimated mortality for all patients, while the ICH Score adequately predicted mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant difference in mortality between transferred and nontransferred patients, but the trend toward higher mortality in nontransferred patients suggests that further evaluation of ED disposition decisions for ICH patients is warranted. Expected ICH mortality may be overestimated by published tools.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20825807      PMCID: PMC3005610          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  13 in total

1.  Withdrawal of support in intracerebral hemorrhage may lead to self-fulfilling prophecies.

Authors:  K J Becker; A B Baxter; W A Cohen; H M Bybee; D L Tirschwell; D W Newell; H R Winn; W T Longstreth
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-03-27       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  ICH score in a rural village in the Republic of Argentina.

Authors:  Daniel Agustin Godoy; Andres Boccio
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Grading scale for prediction of outcome in primary intracerebral hemorrhages.

Authors:  José L Ruiz-Sandoval; Erwin Chiquete; Samuel Romero-Vargas; Juan J Padilla-Martínez; Salvador González-Cornejo
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Genetic and environmental risk factors for intracerebral hemorrhage: preliminary results of a population-based study.

Authors:  Daniel Woo; Laura R Sauerbeck; Brett M Kissela; Jane C Khoury; Jerzy P Szaflarski; James Gebel; Rakesh Shukla; Arthur M Pancioli; Edward C Jauch; Anil G Menon; Ranjan Deka; Janice A Carrozzella; Charles J Moomaw; Robert N Fontaine; Joseph P Broderick
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Admission to a neurologic/neurosurgical intensive care unit is associated with reduced mortality rate after intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  M N Diringer; D F Edwards
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  J C Hemphill; D C Bonovich; L Besmertis; G T Manley; S C Johnston
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Impact of statins on validation of ICH mortality prediction models.

Authors:  Neeraj S Naval; Marek A Mirski; Juan R Carhuapoma
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 2.448

8.  Predicting mortality in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: can modification to original score improve the prediction?

Authors:  Daniel Agustin Godoy; Gustavo Piñero; Mario Di Napoli
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in adults: 2007 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group.

Authors:  Joseph Broderick; Sander Connolly; Edward Feldmann; Daniel Hanley; Carlos Kase; Derk Krieger; Marc Mayberg; Lewis Morgenstern; Christopher S Ogilvy; Paul Vespa; Mario Zuccarello
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Use of the original, modified, or new intracerebral hemorrhage score to predict mortality and morbidity after intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Raymond Tak Fai Cheung; Liang-Yu Zou
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  7 in total

1.  Patient Selection for Drip and Ship Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Michael J Lyerly; Karen C Albright; Amelia K Boehme; Reza Bavarsad Shahripour; John P Donnelly; James T Houston; Pawan V Rawal; Niren Kapoor; Muhammad Alvi; April Sisson; Anne W Alexandrov; Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.954

2.  Peripheral monocyte count is associated with case fatality after intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Opeolu Adeoye; Kyle Walsh; Jessica G Woo; Mary Haverbusch; Charles J Moomaw; Joseph P Broderick; Brett M Kissela; Dawn Kleindorfer; Matthew L Flaherty; Daniel Woo
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  Assessment and Comparison of the Four Most Extensively Validated Prognostic Scales for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tiago Gregório; Sara Pipa; Pedro Cavaleiro; Gabriel Atanásio; Inês Albuquerque; Paulo Castro Chaves; Luís Azevedo
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Cost-effectiveness of transfers to centers with neurological intensive care units after intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Fletcher; Vikas Kotagal; Aaron Mammoser; Mark Peterson; Lewis B Morgenstern; James F Burke
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Los Angeles Motor Scale to Identify Large Vessel Occlusion: Prehospital Validation and Comparison With Other Screens.

Authors:  Ali Reza Noorian; Nerses Sanossian; Kristina Shkirkova; David S Liebeskind; Marc Eckstein; Samuel J Stratton; Franklin D Pratt; Robin Conwit; Fiona Chatfield; Latisha K Sharma; Lucas Restrepo; Miguel Valdes-Sueiras; May Kim-Tenser; Sidney Starkman; Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Which factors influence decisions to transfer and treat patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage and which are associated with prognosis? A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kamran A Abid; Andy Vail; Hiren C Patel; Andrew T King; Pippa J Tyrrell; Adrian R Parry-Jones
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Transferring Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage Does Not Increase In-Hospital Mortality.

Authors:  Farhaan Vahidy; Claude Nguyen; Karen C Albright; Amelia K Boehme; Osman Mir; Kara A Sands; Sean I Savitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.