Literature DB >> 29459391

Los Angeles Motor Scale to Identify Large Vessel Occlusion: Prehospital Validation and Comparison With Other Screens.

Ali Reza Noorian1, Nerses Sanossian2, Kristina Shkirkova2, David S Liebeskind2, Marc Eckstein2, Samuel J Stratton2, Franklin D Pratt2, Robin Conwit2, Fiona Chatfield2, Latisha K Sharma2, Lucas Restrepo2, Miguel Valdes-Sueiras2, May Kim-Tenser2, Sidney Starkman2, Jeffrey L Saver2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Prehospital scales have been developed to identify patients with acute cerebral ischemia (ACI) because of large vessel occlusion (LVO) for direct routing to Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSCs), but few have been validated in the prehospital setting, and their impact on routing of patients with intracranial hemorrhage has not been delineated. The purpose of this study was to validate the Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS) for LVO and CSC-appropriate (LVO ACI and intracranial hemorrhage patients) recognition and compare the LAMS to other scales.
METHODS: The performance of the LAMS, administered prehospital by paramedics to consecutive ambulance trial patients, was assessed in identifying (1) LVOs among all patients with ACI and (2) CSC-appropriate patients among all suspected strokes. Additionally, the LAMS administered postarrival was compared concurrently with 6 other scales proposed for paramedic use and the full National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.
RESULTS: Among 94 patients, age was 70 (±13) and 49% female. Final diagnoses were ACI in 76% (because of LVO in 48% and non-LVO in 28%), intracranial hemorrhage in 19%, and neurovascular mimic in 5%. The LAMS administered by paramedics in the field performed moderately well in identifying LVO among patients with ACI (C statistic, 0.79; accuracy, 0.72) and CSC-appropriate among all suspected stroke transports (C statistic, 0.80; accuracy, 0.72). When concurrently performed in the emergency department postarrival, the LAMS showed comparable or better accuracy versus the 7 comparator scales, for LVO among ACI (accuracies LAMS, 0.70; other scales, 0.62-0.68) and CSC-appropriate (accuracies LAMS, 0.73; other scales, 0.56-0.73).
CONCLUSIONS: The LAMS performed in the field by paramedics identifies LVO and CSC-appropriate patients with good accuracy. The LAMS performs comparably or better than more extended prehospital scales and the full National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.
© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulances; brain ischemia; cerebral hemorrhage; thrombectomy; triage

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29459391      PMCID: PMC5829024          DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  36 in total

1.  Thrombolysis in Stroke Patients with Isolated Aphasia.

Authors:  C Denier; O Chassin; C Vandendries; L Bayon de la Tour; C Cauquil; M Sarov; D Adams; C Flamand-Roze
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.762

2.  Intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke patients with isolated homonymous hemianopia: analysis of Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombolysis Register (SITS-ISTR).

Authors:  Daniel Strbian; Niaz Ahmed; Nils Wahlgren; Markku Kaste; Turgut Tatlisumak
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Methodology of the Field Administration of Stroke Therapy - Magnesium (FAST-MAG) phase 3 trial: Part 1 - rationale and general methods.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Saver; Sidney Starkman; Marc Eckstein; Samuel Stratton; Frank Pratt; Scott Hamilton; Robin Conwit; David S Liebeskind; Gene Sung; Nerses Sanossian
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.266

4.  Design and validation of a prehospital scale to predict stroke severity: Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Severity Scale.

Authors:  Brian S Katz; Jason T McMullan; Heidi Sucharew; Opeolu Adeoye; Joseph P Broderick
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Admission to a neurologic/neurosurgical intensive care unit is associated with reduced mortality rate after intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  M N Diringer; D F Edwards
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Relationship between neurologic deficit severity and final functional outcome shifts and strengthens during first hours after onset.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Saver; Hernan Altman
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  The Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS): a new measure to characterize stroke severity in the field.

Authors:  Jennifer N Llanes; Chelsea S Kidwell; Sidney Starkman; Megan C Leary; Marc Eckstein; Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.077

8.  A brief prehospital stroke severity scale identifies ischemic stroke patients harboring persisting large arterial occlusions.

Authors:  Bijen Nazliel; Sidney Starkman; David S Liebeskind; Bruce Ovbiagele; Doojin Kim; Nerses Sanossian; Latisha Ali; Brian Buck; Pablo Villablanca; Fernando Vinuela; Gary Duckwiler; Reza Jahan; Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Stroke vision, aphasia, neglect (VAN) assessment-a novel emergent large vessel occlusion screening tool: pilot study and comparison with current clinical severity indices.

Authors:  Mohamed S Teleb; Anna Ver Hage; Jaqueline Carter; Mahesh V Jayaraman; Ryan A McTaggart
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 5.836

10.  Stroke care: initial data from a county-based bypass protocol for patients with acute stroke.

Authors:  Syed F Zaidi; Julie Shawver; Aixa Espinosa Morales; Hisham Salahuddin; Gretchen Tietjen; David Lindstrom; Brent Parquette; Andrea Adams; Andrea Korsnack; Mouhammad A Jumaa
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 5.836

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Mobile Stroke Units: Bringing Treatment to the Patient.

Authors:  Mikel S Ehntholt; Melvin Parasram; Saad A Mir; Mackenzie P Lerario
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  DAWN and DEFUSE-3 trials: is time still important?

Authors:  A Ragoschke-Schumm; S Walter
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Prehospital Prediction of Large Vessel Occlusion in Suspected Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Kevin J Keenan; Charles Kircher; Jason T McMullan
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  The Accuracy of Large Vessel Occlusion Recognition Scales in Telestroke Setting.

Authors:  Mohammad Anadani; Eyad Almallouhi; Amy E Wahlquist; Ellen Debenham; Christine A Holmstedt
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.536

5.  Stroke Network of Wisconsin (SNOW) Scale Predicts Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke in the Prehospital Setting.

Authors:  Kessarin Panichpisal; Sarah Erpenbeck; Paul Vilar; Reji P Babygirija; Maharaj Singh; M Riccardo Colella; Richard A Rovin
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2022-04-18

6.  Distributional Validity and Prognostic Power of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in US Administrative Claims Data.

Authors:  Hamidreza Saber; Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 18.302

7.  Usefulness of a single-parameter tool for the prediction of large vessel occlusion in acute stroke.

Authors:  Franck Leibinger; Denis Sablot; Thibaut Allou; Laurène Van Damme; Chawki Jebali; Caroline Arquizan; Geoffroy Farouil; Alexandre Laverdure; Nicolas Gaillard; Majo Ibanez; Philippe Smadja; Anais Dutray; Maxime Tardieu; Ludovic Nguyen Them; Ali Ousji; Snejana Jurici; Gregory Gascou; Zoubir Mourad Bensalah; Nadège Olivier; Frederique Damon; Wael Chaabane; Bénédicte Fadat; Marlène Lachcar; Julie Mas; Isabelle Mourand; Adelaïde Ferraro; Didier Heve; Adrian Dumitrana; Jean-Christophe Blenet; Sabine Aptel; Vincent Costalat; Alain Bonafe; Laurent Ortega
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Performance of the vision, aphasia, neglect (VAN) assessment within a single large EMS system.

Authors:  Mehul D Patel; Jackie Thompson; José G Cabañas; Jefferson G Williams; Erin Lewis; Michael Bachman; Mahmoud Al Masry; Charles LaVigne; Leonardo Morantes; Tibor Becske; Omar Kass-Hout
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.836

9.  Effects of state-wide implementation of the Los Angeles Motor Scale for triage of stroke patients in clinical practice.

Authors:  Stefanie Behnke; Thomas Schlechtriemen; Andreas Binder; Monika Bachhuber; Mark Becker; Benedikt Trauth; Martin Lesmeister; Elmar Spüntrup; Silke Walter; Lukas Hoor; Andreas Ragoschke-Schumm; Fatma Merzou; Luca Tarantini; Thomas Bertsch; Jürgen Guldner; Achim Magull-Seltenreich; Frank Maier; Christoph Massing; Volkmar Fischer; Michael Gawlitza; Katrin Donnevert; Hans-Michael Lamberty; Stefan Jung; Matthias Strittmatter; Silke Tonner; Johannes Schuler; Robert Liszka; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Iris Q Grunwald; Wolfgang Reith; Klaus Fassbender
Journal:  Neurol Res Pract       Date:  2021-06-01

10.  Predicting neuroimaging eligibility for extended-window endovascular thrombectomy.

Authors:  Adam de Havenon; Kole Mickolio; Steven O'Donnell; Greg Stoddard; J Scott McNally; Matthew Alexander; Philipp Taussky; Al-Wala Awad
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.