OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess measures of the clinical value of computed tomography (CT) scans in dizziness presentations at the aggregate level. METHODS: Using emergency department (ED) dizziness presentations captured in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, the proportion of dizziness visits with a CT scan that received a central nervous system (CNS) diagnosis was measured yearly (1995-2004) and assessed for a trend over time. The independent association of having a CT scan with ED length of stay was examined using multivariable linear regression models. RESULTS: The proportion of dizziness visits with a CT scan that received a CNS diagnosis dropped 62% from 1995 to 2004 (P < .05). By 2004, 94.1% (95% confidence interval, 89.4%-96.7%) of dizziness visits with a CT did not receive a CNS diagnosis. Having a CT scan was associated with a substantial increase in the length of stay with the effect modified by the number of other tests performed (range of increase, 40-77 minutes). CONCLUSION: The clinical value of CT scans in dizziness presentations at the aggregate level may be very low and appears to have dropped over time. Computed tomography scans in the general dizziness population could also be an important contributor to ED length of stay. Use of CT scans in dizziness presentations should be a target for efforts to optimize the effectiveness and efficiency of care.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess measures of the clinical value of computed tomography (CT) scans in dizziness presentations at the aggregate level. METHODS: Using emergency department (ED) dizziness presentations captured in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, the proportion of dizziness visits with a CT scan that received a central nervous system (CNS) diagnosis was measured yearly (1995-2004) and assessed for a trend over time. The independent association of having a CT scan with ED length of stay was examined using multivariable linear regression models. RESULTS: The proportion of dizziness visits with a CT scan that received a CNS diagnosis dropped 62% from 1995 to 2004 (P < .05). By 2004, 94.1% (95% confidence interval, 89.4%-96.7%) of dizziness visits with a CT did not receive a CNS diagnosis. Having a CT scan was associated with a substantial increase in the length of stay with the effect modified by the number of other tests performed (range of increase, 40-77 minutes). CONCLUSION: The clinical value of CT scans in dizziness presentations at the aggregate level may be very low and appears to have dropped over time. Computed tomography scans in the general dizziness population could also be an important contributor to ED length of stay. Use of CT scans in dizziness presentations should be a target for efforts to optimize the effectiveness and efficiency of care.
Authors: Julio A Chalela; Chelsea S Kidwell; Lauren M Nentwich; Marie Luby; John A Butman; Andrew M Demchuk; Michael D Hill; Nicholas Patronas; Lawrence Latour; Steven Warach Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-01-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Debra Eagles; Ian G Stiell; Catherine M Clement; Jamie Brehaut; Anne-Maree Kelly; Suzanne Mason; Arthur Kellermann; Jeffrey J Perry Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: David E Newman-Toker; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Carlos A Camargo; Andrea J Pelletier; Gregary T Butchy; Jonathan A Edlow Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: M von Brevern; A Radtke; F Lezius; M Feldmann; T Ziese; T Lempert; H Neuhauser Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2006-11-29 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Victoria A Stanton; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Carlos A Camargo; Jonathan A Edlow; Paris B Lovett; Paris Lovett; Joshua N Goldstein; Stephanie Abbuhl; Michelle Lin; Arjun Chanmugam; Richard E Rothman; David E Newman-Toker Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Alexander A Tarnutzer; Aaron L Berkowitz; Karen A Robinson; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; David E Newman-Toker Journal: CMAJ Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Kevin A Kerber; Lewis B Morgenstern; William J Meurer; Thomas McLaughlin; Pamela A Hall; Jane Forman; A Mark Fendrick; David E Newman-Toker Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Kevin A Kerber; Timothy P Hofer; William J Meurer; A Mark Fendrick; Lewis B Morgenstern Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-03-24 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Kevin A Kerber; James F Burke; Lesli E Skolarus; William J Meurer; Brian C Callaghan; Devin L Brown; Lynda D Lisabeth; Thomas J McLaughlin; A Mark Fendrick; Lewis B Morgenstern Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 3.497