OBJECTIVE: To describe the spectrum of visits to US emergency departments (EDs) for acute dizziness and determine whether ED patients with dizziness are diagnosed as having a range of benign and dangerous medical disorders, rather than predominantly vestibular ones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study of ED visits from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) used a weighted sample of US ED visits (1993-2005) to measure patient and hospital demographics, ED diagnoses, and resource use in cases vs controls without dizziness. Dizziness in patients 16 years or older was defined as an NHAMCS reason-for-visit code of dizziness/vertigo (1225.0) or a final International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis of dizziness/vertigo (780.4) or of a vestibular disorder (386.x). RESULTS: A total of 9472 dizziness cases (3.3% of visits) were sampled over 13 years (weighted 33.6 million). Top diagnostic groups were otologic/vestibular (32.9%), cardiovascular (21.1%), respiratory (11.5%), neurologic (11.2%, including 4% cerebrovascular), metabolic (11.0%), injury/poisoning (10.6%), psychiatric (7.2%), digestive (7.0%), genitourinary (5.1%), and infectious (2.9%). Nearly half of the cases (49.2%) were given a medical diagnosis, and 22.1% were given only a symptom diagnosis. Predefined dangerous disorders were diagnosed in 15%, especially among those older than 50 years (20.9% vs 9.3%; P<.001). Dizziness cases were evaluated longer (mean 4.0 vs 3.4 hours), imaged disproportionately (18.0% vs 6.9% undergoing computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging), and admitted more often (18.8% vs 14.8%) (all P<.001). CONCLUSION: Dizziness is not attributed to a vestibular disorder in most ED cases and often is associated with cardiovascular or other medical causes, including dangerous ones. Resource use is substantial, yet many patients remain undiagnosed.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the spectrum of visits to US emergency departments (EDs) for acute dizziness and determine whether ED patients with dizziness are diagnosed as having a range of benign and dangerous medical disorders, rather than predominantly vestibular ones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study of ED visits from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) used a weighted sample of US ED visits (1993-2005) to measure patient and hospital demographics, ED diagnoses, and resource use in cases vs controls without dizziness. Dizziness in patients 16 years or older was defined as an NHAMCS reason-for-visit code of dizziness/vertigo (1225.0) or a final International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis of dizziness/vertigo (780.4) or of a vestibular disorder (386.x). RESULTS: A total of 9472 dizziness cases (3.3% of visits) were sampled over 13 years (weighted 33.6 million). Top diagnostic groups were otologic/vestibular (32.9%), cardiovascular (21.1%), respiratory (11.5%), neurologic (11.2%, including 4% cerebrovascular), metabolic (11.0%), injury/poisoning (10.6%), psychiatric (7.2%), digestive (7.0%), genitourinary (5.1%), and infectious (2.9%). Nearly half of the cases (49.2%) were given a medical diagnosis, and 22.1% were given only a symptom diagnosis. Predefined dangerous disorders were diagnosed in 15%, especially among those older than 50 years (20.9% vs 9.3%; P<.001). Dizziness cases were evaluated longer (mean 4.0 vs 3.4 hours), imaged disproportionately (18.0% vs 6.9% undergoing computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging), and admitted more often (18.8% vs 14.8%) (all P<.001). CONCLUSION:Dizziness is not attributed to a vestibular disorder in most ED cases and often is associated with cardiovascular or other medical causes, including dangerous ones. Resource use is substantial, yet many patients remain undiagnosed.
Authors: Julio A Chalela; Chelsea S Kidwell; Lauren M Nentwich; Marie Luby; John A Butman; Andrew M Demchuk; Michael D Hill; Nicholas Patronas; Lawrence Latour; Steven Warach Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-01-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Debra Eagles; Ian G Stiell; Catherine M Clement; Jamie Brehaut; Anne-Maree Kelly; Suzanne Mason; Arthur Kellermann; Jeffrey J Perry Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: David E Newman-Toker; Lisa M Cannon; Matthew E Stofferahn; Richard E Rothman; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; David S Zee Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Victoria A Stanton; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Carlos A Camargo; Jonathan A Edlow; Paris B Lovett; Paris Lovett; Joshua N Goldstein; Stephanie Abbuhl; Michelle Lin; Arjun Chanmugam; Richard E Rothman; David E Newman-Toker Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Otto R Maarsingh; Jacquelien Dros; François G Schellevis; Henk C van Weert; Danielle A van der Windt; Gerben ter Riet; Henriette E van der Horst Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Alexander A Tarnutzer; Aaron L Berkowitz; Karen A Robinson; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; David E Newman-Toker Journal: CMAJ Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: S Vanni; R Pecci; C Casati; F Moroni; M Risso; M Ottaviani; P Nazerian; S Grifoni; P Vannucchi Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 2.124
Authors: Babak B Navi; Hooman Kamel; Maulik P Shah; Aaron W Grossman; Christine Wong; Sharon N Poisson; William D Whetstone; S Andrew Josephson; S Claiborne Johnston; Anthony S Kim Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 7.616