Literature DB >> 20824996

Determination of normative neck muscle morphometry using upright MRI with comparison to supine data.

Brian D Stemper1, Jamie L Baisden, Narayan Yoganandan, Frank A Pintar, Glenn R Paskoff, Barry S Shender.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neck muscles are important in the static and dynamic stability of the head-neck complex. Deep neck muscles act to maintain upright posture and superficial muscles are responsible for gross movements. Previous studies have quantified neck muscle geometry using traditional supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, supine orientation removes the vertical load on the cervical spine from the head-neck complex and changes the relative orientation of the spine and neck muscles. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of upright MRI to obtain neck muscle morphometric data on a spinal level-by-level basis for subjects in upright seated positions.
METHODS: Upright MRI scans were obtained of the neck region for six younger male volunteers in neutral and flexed positions. Planar images were oriented parallel to the intervertebral disc space at each level. Cross-sectional area (CSA) and orientation of neck muscles were quantified at four spinal levels.
RESULTS: Area and position of all four muscles were significantly dependent upon spinal level. Average CSA of the sternocleidomastoid, longus colli, levator scapulae, and trapezius muscles in neutral position were 512, 113, 281, and 174 mm2. Head-neck position significantly affected area and position of the sternocleidomastoid and position of posterior neck muscles. DISCUSSION: Comparison of neck muscle areas from the present study to a previous study incorporating supine MRI demonstrated differing trends between anterior and posterior neck muscles that may be attributable to upright orientation of volunteers and planar image orientation in the present study. Differences between supine and upright MRI identified in the present study may warrant incorporation of this technique in future spinal imaging studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20824996     DOI: 10.3357/asem.2758.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  7 in total

1.  Quantitative identification and segmentation repeatability of thoracic spinal muscle morphology.

Authors:  Anoosha Pai S; Honglin Zhang; Jason R Shewchuk; Bedoor Al Omran; John Street; David Wilson; Majid Doroudi; Stephen H M Brown; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2020-07-01

2.  Preliminary investigation of spinal level and postural effects on thoracic muscle morphology with upright open MRI.

Authors:  Anoosha Pai S; Honglin Zhang; John Street; David R Wilson; Stephen H M Brown; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2021-02-08

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based relationships between neck muscle cross-sectional area and neck circumference for adults and children.

Authors:  Renée M Dawson; Zahid Latif; E Mark Haacke; John M Cavanaugh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Upright magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: Back pain and radiculopathy.

Authors:  Ha Son Nguyen; Ninh Doan; Saman Shabani; Jamie Baisden; Christopher Wolfla; Glenn Paskoff; Barry Shender; Brian Stemper
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

5.  MRI-determined lumbar muscle morphometry in man and sheep: potential biomechanical implications for ovine model to human spine translation.

Authors:  Stephanie Valentin; Theresia F Licka; James Elliott
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Neck Muscle Changes Following Long-Duration Spaceflight.

Authors:  Kyle P McNamara; Katelyn A Greene; Janet A Tooze; Jade Dang; Karim Khattab; Leon Lenchik; Ashley A Weaver
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Synchronous imaging of pelvic geometry and muscle morphometry: a pilot study of pelvic retroversion using upright MRI.

Authors:  Noor Shaikh; Honglin Zhang; Stephen H M Brown; Hamza Lari; Oliver Lasry; John Street; David R Wilson; Thomas Oxland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.