Literature DB >> 32068531

Plaster cast versus functional bracing for Achilles tendon rupture: the UKSTAR RCT.

Matthew L Costa1, Juul Achten1, Susan Wagland1, Ioana R Marian1, Mandy Maredza2, Michael Maia Schlüssel1, Anna S Liew1, Nick R Parsons3, Susan J Dutton1, Rebecca S Kearney2, Sarah E Lamb1,4, Benjamin Ollivere5, Stavros Petrou2,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Achilles tendon rupture affects > 11,000 people each year in the UK, leading to prolonged periods away from work, sports and social activities. Traditionally, the ruptured tendon is held still in a plaster cast for ≥ 8 weeks. Functional bracing is an alternative treatment that allows patients to mobilise earlier, but there is little evidence about how bracing affects patients' recovery.
OBJECTIVES: To measure the Achilles Tendon Rupture Score, quality of life, complications and resource use of patients receiving non-operative treatment for an Achilles tendon rupture treated with plaster cast compared with those treated with functional bracing.
DESIGN: This was a multicentre, randomised, pragmatic, two-group superiority trial.
SETTING: The setting was 39 NHS hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 540 adult patients treated non-operatively for Achilles tendon rupture were randomised from July 2016 to May 2018. Exclusion criteria included presenting after 14 days, having had previous rupture and being unable to complete questionnaires.
INTERVENTIONS: A total of 266 participants had a plaster cast applied, with their toes initially pointing to the floor. The cast was changed over 8 weeks to bring the foot into a walking position. A total of 274 patients had a functional brace that facilitated immediate weight-bearing. The foot position was adjusted within the brace over the same 8-week period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Achilles Tendon Rupture Score is patient reported and assesses symptoms and physical activity related to the Achilles tendon (score 0-100, with 100 being the best possible outcome). The secondary outcomes were quality of life, complications and resource use at 8 weeks and at 3, 6 and 9 months.
RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 48.7 years, were predominantly male (79%) and had ruptured their tendon during sports (70%). Over 93% of participants completed follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference in Achilles Tendon Rupture Score at 9 months post injury (-1.38, 95% confidence interval -4.9 to 2.1). There was a statistically significant difference in Achilles Tendon Rupture Score at 8 weeks post injury in favour of the functional brace group (5.53, 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 9.1), but not at 3 or 6 months post injury. Quality of life showed the same pattern, with a statistically significant difference at 8 weeks post injury but not at later time points. Complication profiles were similar in both groups. Re-rupture of the tendon occurred 17 times in the plaster cast group and 13 times in the functional brace group. There was no difference in resource use.
CONCLUSIONS: This trial provides strong evidence that early weight-bearing in a functional brace provides similar outcomes to traditional plaster casting and is safe for patients receiving non-operative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. The probability that functional bracing is cost-effective exceeds 95% for the base-case imputed analysis, assuming a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. On average, functional brace is associated with lower costs (-£103, 95% confidence interval -£290 to £84) and more quality-adjusted life-years (0.015, 95% confidence interval -0.0013 to 0.030) than plaster cast. LIMITATIONS: Some patients declined to participate in the trial, but only a small proportion of these declined because they had a preference for one treatment or another. Overall, 58% of eligible patients agreed to participate, so the participants are broadly representative of the population under investigation. FUTURE WORK: Although the UK Study of Tendo Achilles Rehabilitation provides guidance with regard to early management, rehabilitation following Achilles tendon rupture is prolonged and further research is required to define the optimal mode of rehabilitation after the initial cast/brace has been removed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN62639639. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 8. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACHILLES; ANKLE; REHABILITATION; RUPTURE; TENDON

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32068531      PMCID: PMC7049909          DOI: 10.3310/hta24080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Technol Assess        ISSN: 1366-5278            Impact factor:   4.014


  40 in total

1.  Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension.

Authors:  Melanie Calvert; Jane Blazeby; Douglas G Altman; Dennis A Revicki; David Moher; Michael D Brundage
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Surgical and non-surgical treatment of Achilles Tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  L Nistor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Early motion of the ankle after operative treatment of a rupture of the Achilles tendon. A prospective, randomized clinical and radiographic study.

Authors:  H M Mortensen; O Skov; P E Jensen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Weight bearing the same day versus non-weight bearing for 4 weeks in Achilles tendon rupture.

Authors:  Murat Korkmaz; Mustafa Fatih Erkoc; Sadiye Yolcu; Ozlem Balbaloglu; Zekeriya Öztemur; Fatih Karaaslan
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 1.601

5.  Nonoperative, dynamic treatment of acute achilles tendon rupture: influence of early weightbearing on biomechanical properties of the plantar flexor muscle-tendon complex-a blinded, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Kristoffer Weisskirchner Barfod; Jesper Bencke; Hanne Bloch Lauridsen; Christian Dippmann; Lars Ebskov; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 1.286

6.  Early weightbearing and ankle mobilization after open repair of acute midsubstance tears of the achilles tendon.

Authors:  Nicola Maffulli; Cheryl Tallon; Jason Wong; Kim Peng Lim; Robert Bleakney
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Acute Achilles tendon rupture: minimally invasive surgery versus nonoperative treatment with immediate full weightbearing--a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Roderick Metz; Egbert-Jan M M Verleisdonk; Geert J-M-G van der Heijden; Geert-Jan Clevers; Erik R Hammacher; Michiel H J Verhofstad; Christiaan van der Werken
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  A new treatment of ruptured Achilles tendons. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  R Cetti; L O Henriksen; K S Jacobsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Efficacy of early controlled motion of the ankle compared with immobilisation in non-operative treatment of patients with an acute Achilles tendon rupture: an assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Kristoffer Weisskirchner Barfod; Maria Swennergren Hansen; Per Hölmich; Morten Tange Kristensen; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Achilles tendon rupture rehabilitation: a mixed methods investigation of current practice among orthopaedic surgeons in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  R S Kearney; N Parsons; M Underwood; M L Costa
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.853

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fast Functional Rehabilitation Protocol versus Plaster Cast Immobilization Protocol after Achilles Tendon Tenorrhaphy: Is It Different? Clinical, Ultrasonographic, and Elastographic Comparison.

Authors:  Mario Mosconi; Gianluigi Pasta; Salvatore Annunziata; Viviana Guerrieri; Matteo Ghiara; Simone Perelli; Camilla Torriani; Federico Alberto Grassi; Eugenio Jannelli
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.