Literature DB >> 2082452

Quality assessment of blood pressure measurements in epidemiological surveys. The impact of last digit preference and the proportions of identical duplicate measurements. WHO Monica Project [corrected].

H W Hense1, K Kuulasmaa, A Zaborskis, W Kupsc, J Tuomilehto.   

Abstract

In the WHO MONICA Project, cardiovascular risk factor surveys including measurements of arterial blood pressure (BP) were conducted in more than 50 different populations. In the course of a retrospective BP measurement quality assessment effort, two indicators of "prejudiced" blood pressure reading, last digit preference and high proportions of identical results in duplicate measurements, are used in addition to other items to evaluate blood pressure measurement quality. We used fictitious blood pressure distributions and applied to them Last Digit Preference scores and Proportions of Identical Duplicate Measurements actually found in the MONICA surveys. The analysis showed that Last Digit Preference affects predominantly the shape of the BP distribution curve, whereas high Proportions of Identical Duplicate Measurements may cause a shift of the entire BP distribution curve. Although the two items are partly interrelated, a clear distinction between them and their effects is advocated.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2082452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique        ISSN: 0398-7620            Impact factor:   1.019


  5 in total

1.  Comparing hypertension guidelines. Technical difficulties may have affected study's results.

Authors:  S Barton; M Cranney; T Walley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-09

2.  A whole-blood transcriptome meta-analysis identifies gene expression signatures of cigarette smoking.

Authors:  Tianxiao Huan; Roby Joehanes; Claudia Schurmann; Katharina Schramm; Luke C Pilling; Marjolein J Peters; Reedik Mägi; Dawn DeMeo; George T O'Connor; Luigi Ferrucci; Alexander Teumer; Georg Homuth; Reiner Biffar; Uwe Völker; Christian Herder; Melanie Waldenberger; Annette Peters; Sonja Zeilinger; Andres Metspalu; Albert Hofman; André G Uitterlinden; Dena G Hernandez; Andrew B Singleton; Stefania Bandinelli; Peter J Munson; Honghuang Lin; Emelia J Benjamin; Tõnu Esko; Hans J Grabe; Holger Prokisch; Joyce B J van Meurs; David Melzer; Daniel Levy
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  The Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer. Manufacturer fights back.

Authors:  J A Dinning
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-10

4.  The management of hypertension in the elderly by general practitioners in Merseyside: the rule of halves revisited.

Authors:  M Cranney; S Barton; T Walley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Multimorbidity and blood pressure control in 37 651 hypertensive patients from Danish general practice.

Authors:  Maja S Paulsen; Morten Andersen; Janus L Thomsen; Henrik Schroll; Pia V Larsen; Jesper Lykkegaard; Ib A Jacobsen; Mogens L Larsen; Bo Christensen; Jens Sondergaard
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 5.501

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.