Literature DB >> 20822291

Neurally constrained modeling of perceptual decision making.

Braden A Purcell1, Richard P Heitz, Jeremiah Y Cohen, Jeffrey D Schall, Gordon D Logan, Thomas J Palmeri.   

Abstract

Stochastic accumulator models account for response time in perceptual decision-making tasks by assuming that perceptual evidence accumulates to a threshold. The present investigation mapped the firing rate of frontal eye field (FEF) visual neurons onto perceptual evidence and the firing rate of FEF movement neurons onto evidence accumulation to test alternative models of how evidence is combined in the accumulation process. The models were evaluated on their ability to predict both response time distributions and movement neuron activity observed in monkeys performing a visual search task. Models that assume gating of perceptual evidence to the accumulating units provide the best account of both behavioral and neural data. These results identify discrete stages of processing with anatomically distinct neural populations and rule out several alternative architectures. The results also illustrate the use of neurophysiological data as a model selection tool and establish a novel framework to bridge computational and neural levels of explanation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20822291      PMCID: PMC2979343          DOI: 10.1037/a0020311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  168 in total

Review 1.  Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting.

Authors:  J D Schall
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching.

Authors:  T Van Zandt; H Colonius; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

3.  Separate signals for target selection and movement specification in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  G D Horwitz; W T Newsome
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Exploring the consequences of the previous trial.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Effects of search efficiency on surround suppression during visual selection in frontal eye field.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall; Takashi R Sato; Kirk G Thompson; Amanda A Vaughn; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Neural variability in premotor cortex provides a signature of motor preparation.

Authors:  Mark M Churchland; Byron M Yu; Stephen I Ryu; Gopal Santhanam; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The effect of visual search efficiency on response preparation: neurophysiological evidence for discrete flow.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Min-Suk Kang; Kirk Thompson; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-02

9.  Topography of visual cortex connections with frontal eye field in macaque: convergence and segregation of processing streams.

Authors:  J D Schall; A Morel; D J King; J Bullier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Discharge characteristics of single units in superior colliculus of the alert rhesus monkey.

Authors:  P H Schiller; F Koerner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  149 in total

1.  Activation in the neural network responsible for categorization and recognition reflects parameter changes.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Daniel R Little; Thomas W James
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Neural correlates of correct and errant attentional selection revealed through N2pc and frontal eye field activity.

Authors:  Richard P Heitz; Jeremiah Y Cohen; Geoffrey F Woodman; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Dynamics of individual perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Daniel M Merfeld; Torin K Clark; Yue M Lu; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  The importance of decision onset.

Authors:  Tobias Teichert; Jack Grinband; Vincent Ferrera
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Major issues in the study of visual search: Part 2 of "40 Years of Feature Integration: Special Issue in Memory of Anne Treisman".

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  A single trial analysis of EEG in recognition memory: Tracking the neural correlates of memory strength.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Per B Sederberg; Troy A Smith; Russ Childers
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Decoding the brain's algorithm for categorization from its neural implementation.

Authors:  Michael L Mack; Alison R Preston; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Sean Deering; Annalisa M Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Model-based cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Thomas J Palmeri; Bradley C Love; Brandon M Turner
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.223

10.  Sensory and decision-making processes underlying perceptual adaptation.

Authors:  Nathan Witthoft; Long Sha; Jonathan Winawer; Roozbeh Kiani
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.