Literature DB >> 20822290

The categorization-individuation model: an integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit.

Kurt Hugenberg1, Steven G Young, Michael J Bernstein, Donald F Sacco.   

Abstract

The other-race effect (ORE), or the finding that same-race faces are better recognized than other-race faces, is one of the best replicated phenomena in face recognition. The current article reviews existing evidence and theory and proposes a new theoretical framework for the ORE, which argues that the effect results from a confluence of social categorization, motivated individuation, and perceptual experience. This categorization-individuation model offers not only a parsimonious account of both classic and recent evidence for category-based biases in face recognition but also links the ORE to broader evidence and theory in social cognition and face perception. Finally, the categorization-individuation model makes a series of novel predictions for how the ORE can be exacerbated, attenuated, or even eliminated via perceptual and motivational processes, both by improving other-race recognition and by reducing same-race recognition. The authors propose that this new model for the ORE also leads to applied interventions that differ sharply from other theories of the ORE, while simultaneously providing an integrative theoretical framework for future research on the ORE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20822290     DOI: 10.1037/a0020463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  84 in total

1.  Postencoding cognitive processes in the cross-race effect: Categorization and individuation during face recognition.

Authors:  Michael R Ho; Kathy Pezdek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

2.  Effects of visual expertise on a novel eye-size illusion: implications for holistic face processing.

Authors:  Genyue Fu; Yan Dong; Paul C Quinn; Wen S Xiao; Qiandong Wang; Guowei Chen; Olivier Pascalis; Kang Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Inconsistent individual personality description eliminates the other-race effect.

Authors:  Lanya Zhang; Guomei Zhou; Xiaoping Pu; William G Hayward
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

Review 4.  Grappling With Implicit Social Bias: A Perspective From Memory Research.

Authors:  Heather D Lucas; Jessica D Creery; Xiaoqing Hu; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  The effect of context on responses to racially ambiguous faces: changes in perception and evaluation.

Authors:  Eve Willadsen-Jensen; Tiffany A Ito
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  A cross-race effect in metamemory: Predictions of face recognition are more accurate for members of our own race.

Authors:  Kathleen L Hourihan; Aaron S Benjamin; Xiping Liu
Journal:  J Appl Res Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-02

7.  What drives social in-group biases in face recognition memory? ERP evidence from the own-gender bias.

Authors:  Nicole Wolff; Kathleen Kemter; Stefan R Schweinberger; Holger Wiese
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Visual scanning and recognition of Chinese, Caucasian, and racially ambiguous faces: contributions from bottom-up facial physiognomic information and top-down knowledge of racial categories.

Authors:  Qiandong Wang; Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Chao S Hu; Miao Qian; Genyue Fu; Kang Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Developmental Origins of the Other-Race Effect.

Authors:  Gizelle Anzures; Paul C Quinn; Olivier Pascalis; Alan M Slater; James W Tanaka; Kang Lee
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-06-01

10.  Intergroup social influence on emotion processing in the brain.

Authors:  Lynda C Lin; Yang Qu; Eva H Telzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.