Literature DB >> 20821117

Application of an artificial neural network to the computer-aided differentiation of focal liver disease in MR imaging.

Xuejun Zhang1, Masayuki Kanematsu, Hiroshi Fujita, Xiangrong Zhou, Takeshi Hara, Ryujiro Yokoyama, Hiroaki Hoshi.   

Abstract

The differentiation of focal liver lesions in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is primarily based on the intensity and homogeneity of lesions with different imaging sequences. However, these imaging findings are falsely interpreted in some patients because of the complexities involved. Our aim is to establish a computer-aided diagnosis system named LiverANN for classifying the pathologies of focal liver lesions into five categories using the artificial neural network (ANN) technique. On each MR image, a region of interest (ROI) in the focal liver lesion was delineated by a radiologist. The intensity and homogeneity within the ROI were calculated automatically, producing numerical data that were analyzed by feeding them into the LiverANN as inputs. Outputs were the following five pathologic categories of hepatic disease: hepatic cyst, hepatocellular carcinoma, dysplasia in cirrhosis, cavernous hemangioma, and metastasis. Of the 320 MR images obtained from 80 patients (four images per patient) with liver lesions, our LiverANN classified 50 cases of a training set into five types of liver lesions with a training accuracy of 100% and 30 test cases with a testing accuracy of 93%. The experiment demonstrated that our LiverANN, which functions as a computer-aided differentiation tool, can provide radiologists with a second opinion during the radiologic diagnostic procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20821117     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-009-0062-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  27 in total

1.  Addition of gadolinium chelates to heavily T2-weighted MR imaging: limited role in differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from metastases.

Authors:  G L Bennett; A Petersein; W W Mayo-Smith; P F Hahn; W Schima; S Saini
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Analysis of vasculature for liver surgical planning.

Authors:  Dirk Selle; Bernhard Preim; Andrea Schenk; Heinz-Otto Peitgen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  An improved shift-invariant artificial neural network for computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms.

Authors:  W Zhang; K Doi; M L Giger; R M Nishikawa; R A Schmidt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Differentiation of hepatic hemangiomas from metastases by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  B Hamm; E Fischer; M Taupitz
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Studies on tissue characterization by texture analysis with co-occurrence matrix method using ultrasonography and CT imaging.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Kouichi Itoh; Nobuyuki Taniguchi; Hisao Toei; Fukiko Kawai; Michiru Nakamura; Kiyoka Omoto; Kyoko Yokota; Tomoko Ono
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.314

6.  Differentiation between small hepatic hemangiomas and metastases on MR images: importance of size-specific quantitative criteria.

Authors:  K Itoh; S Saini; P F Hahn; N Imam; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Cancer statistics, 1999.

Authors:  S H Landis; T Murray; S Bolden; P A Wingo
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Dynamic breath-hold multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging with gadolinium enhancement for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from malignancies at 1.5 T.

Authors:  W S Whitney; R J Herfkens; R B Jeffrey; C H McDonnell; K C Li; W J Van Dalsem; R N Low; I R Francis; J F Dabatin; G M Glazer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Distinction of hepatic cavernous hemangioma from hepatic metastases with MR imaging.

Authors:  K C Li; G M Glazer; L E Quint; I R Francis; A M Aisen; W D Ensminger; F L Bookstein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Detection and differentiation of diffuse liver disease by quantitative echography. A retrospective assessment.

Authors:  P C Hartman; B J Oosterveld; J M Thijssen; G J Rosenbusch; J van den Berg
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  4 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography parameters in neural network diagnosis of liver tumors.

Authors:  Costin Teodor Streba; Mihaela Ionescu; Dan Ionut Gheonea; Larisa Sandulescu; Tudorel Ciurea; Adrian Saftoiu; Cristin Constantin Vere; Ion Rogoveanu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Diagnosis system for hepatocellular carcinoma based on fractal dimension of morphometric elements integrated in an artificial neural network.

Authors:  Dan Ionuț Gheonea; Costin Teodor Streba; Cristin Constantin Vere; Mircea Şerbănescu; Daniel Pirici; Maria Comănescu; Letiția Adela Maria Streba; Marius Eugen Ciurea; Stelian Mogoantă; Ion Rogoveanu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Quantification of heterogeneity as a biomarker in tumor imaging: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lejla Alic; Wiro J Niessen; Jifke F Veenland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The feasibility to use artificial intelligence to aid detecting focal liver lesions in real-time ultrasound: a preliminary study based on videos.

Authors:  Thodsawit Tiyarattanachai; Terapap Apiparakoon; Sanparith Marukatat; Sasima Sukcharoen; Sirinda Yimsawad; Oracha Chaichuen; Siwat Bhumiwat; Natthaporn Tanpowpong; Nutcha Pinjaroen; Rungsun Rerknimitr; Roongruedee Chaiteerakij
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.