Literature DB >> 20820814

How do non-physician clinicians respond to advanced cancer patients' negative expressions of emotions?

Stewart C Alexander1, Kathryn I Pollak, Perri A Morgan, Justine Strand, Amy P Abernethy, Amy S Jeffreys, Robert M Arnold, Maren Olsen, Keri L Rodriguez, Sarah K Garrigues, Justin R E Manusov, James A Tulsky.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with advanced cancer often experience negative emotion; clinicians' empathic responses can alleviate patient distress. Much is known about how physicians respond to patient emotion; less is known about non-physician clinicians. Given that oncology care is increasingly provided by an interdisciplinary team, it is important to know more about how patients with advanced cancer express emotions to non-physician clinicians (NPCs) and how NPCs respond to those empathic opportunities.
METHOD: We audio recorded conversations between non-physician clinicians and patients with advanced cancer. We analyzed 45 conversations between patients and oncology physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurse clinicians in which patients or their loved ones expressed at least one negative emotion to the NPC (i.e., an empathic opportunity). Empathic opportunities were coded three ways: type of emotion (anger, sadness, or fear), severity of emotion (least, moderate, or most severe), and NPC response to emotion (not empathic, on-topic medical response, and empathic response).
RESULTS: We identified 103 empathic opportunities presented to 25 different NPCs during 45 visits. Approximately half of the empathic opportunities contained anger (53%), followed by sadness (25%) and fear (21%). The majority of emotions expressed were moderately severe (73%), followed by most severe (16%), and least severe (12%). The severity of emotions presented was not found to be statistically different between types of NPCs. NPCs responded to empathic opportunities with empathic statements 30% of the time. Additionally, 40% of the time, NPCs responded to empathic opportunities with on-topic, medical explanations and 30% of the responses were not empathic.
CONCLUSION: Patients expressed emotional concerns to NPCs typically in the form of anger; most emotions were moderately severe, with no statistical differences among types of NPC. On average, NPCs responded to patient emotion with empathic language only 30% of the time. A better understanding of NPC-patient interactions can contribute to improved communication training for NPCs and, ultimately, to higher quality patient care in cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20820814      PMCID: PMC3377476          DOI: 10.1007/s00520-010-0996-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  24 in total

1.  Ensuring quality cancer care through the oncology workforce.

Authors:  Laura Levit; Alison P Smith; Edward J Benz; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 2.  Introduction of novice oncology nurses to end-of-life care.

Authors:  Andria P Caton; Paula Klemm
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.027

3.  Psychological effects of being offered choice of surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  L J Fallowfield; A Hall; P Maguire; M Baum; R P A'Hern
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-08-13

Review 4.  Patient-physician communication in oncology: what does the evidence show?

Authors:  Anthony Back
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 5.  Cancer and depression.

Authors:  D Spiegel
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry Suppl       Date:  1996-06

6.  Future supply and demand for oncologists : challenges to assuring access to oncology services.

Authors:  Clese Erikson; Edward Salsberg; Gaetano Forte; Suanna Bruinooge; Michael Goldstein
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  A study of patient clues and physician responses in primary care and surgical settings.

Authors:  W Levinson; R Gorawara-Bhat; J Lamb
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Oncologists' reactions to cancer patients' verbal cues.

Authors:  P N Butow; R F Brown; S Cogar; M H N Tattersall; S M Dunn
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  When the diagnosis is cancer: patient communication experiences and preferences.

Authors:  P N Butow; J N Kazemi; L J Beeney; A M Griffin; S M Dunn; M H Tattersall
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Does training increase the use of more emotionally laden words by nurses when talking with cancer patients? A randomised study.

Authors:  D Razavi; N Delvaux; S Marchal; J-F Durieux; C Farvacques; L Dubus; R Hogenraad
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  Latent classes of prognosis conversations in palliative care: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Robert Gramling; Sally Norton; Susan Ladwig; Paul Winters; Maureen Metzger; Timothy Quill; Stewart Alexander
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Relationship with God, Loneliness, Anger and Symptom Distress in Patients with Cancer Who are Near the End of Life.

Authors:  Linda Olson Scott; Johnathon M Law; Daniel P Brodeur; Christopher A Salerno; Anzette Thomas; Susan C McMillan
Journal:  J Hosp Palliat Nurs       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.918

3.  Emotional distress and compassionate responses in palliative care decision-making consultations.

Authors:  Stewart C Alexander; Susan Ladwig; Sally A Norton; David Gramling; J Kelly Davis; Maureen Metzger; Jane DeLuca; Robert Gramling
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Deciding what information is necessary: do patients with advanced cancer want to know all the details?

Authors:  Bethany J Russell; Alicia M Ward
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 5.  A new paradigm for clinical communication: critical review of literature in cancer care.

Authors:  Peter Salmon; Bridget Young
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Communication skills training enhances nurses' ability to respond with empathy to parents' emotions in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Kristina Bry; Maija Bry; Elisabet Hentz; Håkan L Karlsson; Hanna Kyllönen; Malin Lundkvist; Helena Wigert
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.299

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.