Literature DB >> 20820472

Identity and divergence of protein domain architectures after the yeast whole-genome duplication event.

Luigi Grassi1, Diana Fusco, Alessandro Sellerio, Davide Corà, Bruno Bassetti, Michele Caselle, Marco Cosentino Lagomarsino.   

Abstract

Gene duplication is a key mechanism in evolution for generating new functionality, and it is known to have produced a large proportion of genes. Duplication mechanisms include small-scale, or "local", events such as unequal crossing over and retroposition, together with global events, such as chromosomal or whole genome duplication (WGD). In particular, different studies confirmed that the yeast S. cerevisiae arose from a 100-150 million-year old whole-genome duplication. Detection and study of duplications are usually based on sequence alignment, synteny and phylogenetic techniques, but protein domains are also useful in assessing protein homology. We develop a simple and computationally efficient protein domain architecture comparison method based on the domain assignments available from public databases. We test the accuracy and the reliability of this method in detecting instances of gene duplication in the yeast S. cerevisiae. In particular, we analyze the evolution of WGD and non-WGD paralogs from the domain viewpoint, in comparison with a more standard functional analysis of the genes. A large number of domains is shared by genes that underwent local and global duplications, indicating the existence of a common set of "duplicable" domains. On the other hand, WGD and non-WGD paralogs tend to have different functions. We find evidence that this comes from functional migration within similar domain superfamilies, but also from the existence of small sets of WGD and non-WGD specific domain superfamilies with largely different functions. This observation gives a novel perspective on the finding that WGD paralogs tend to be functionally different from small-scale paralogs. WGD and non-WGD superfamilies carry distinct functions. Finally, the Gene Ontology similarity of paralogs tends to decrease with duplication age, while this tendency is weaker or not observable by the comparison of the domain architectures of paralogs. This suggests that the set of domains composing a protein tends to be maintained, while its function, cellular process or localization diversifies. Overall, the gathered evidence gives a different viewpoint on the biological specificity of the WGD and at the same time points out the validity of domain architecture comparison as a tool for detecting homology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20820472     DOI: 10.1039/c003507f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biosyst        ISSN: 1742-2051


  10 in total

1.  Processes of fungal proteome evolution and gain of function: gene duplication and domain rearrangement.

Authors:  Inbar Cohen-Gihon; Roded Sharan; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 2.  Living Organisms Author Their Read-Write Genomes in Evolution.

Authors:  James A Shapiro
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-06

3.  Exploring whole-genome duplicate gene retention with complex genetic interaction analysis.

Authors:  Elena Kuzmin; Benjamin VanderSluis; Alex N Nguyen Ba; Wen Wang; Elizabeth N Koch; Matej Usaj; Anton Khmelinskii; Mojca Mattiazzi Usaj; Jolanda van Leeuwen; Oren Kraus; Amy Tresenrider; Michael Pryszlak; Ming-Che Hu; Brenda Varriano; Michael Costanzo; Michael Knop; Alan Moses; Chad L Myers; Brenda J Andrews; Charles Boone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Domain Evolution of Vertebrate Blood Coagulation Cascade Proteins.

Authors:  Abdulbaki Coban; Erich Bornberg-Bauer; Carsten Kemena
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 3.973

Review 5.  PAS kinase: a nutrient sensing regulator of glucose homeostasis.

Authors:  Desiree DeMille; Julianne H Grose
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.885

Review 6.  Retention of duplicated genes in evolution.

Authors:  Elena Kuzmin; John S Taylor; Charles Boone
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Horizontal and vertical growth of S. cerevisiae metabolic network.

Authors:  Luigi Grassi; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Neighbor overlap is enriched in the yeast interaction network: analysis and implications.

Authors:  Ariel Feiglin; John Moult; Byungkook Lee; Yanay Ofran; Ron Unger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Differential gene retention as an evolutionary mechanism to generate biodiversity and adaptation in yeasts.

Authors:  Guillaume Morel; Lieven Sterck; Dominique Swennen; Marina Marcet-Houben; Djamila Onesime; Anthony Levasseur; Noémie Jacques; Sandrine Mallet; Arnaux Couloux; Karine Labadie; Joëlle Amselem; Jean-Marie Beckerich; Bernard Henrissat; Yves Van de Peer; Patrick Wincker; Jean-Luc Souciet; Toni Gabaldón; Colin R Tinsley; Serge Casaregola
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The Regulation of Cbf1 by PAS Kinase Is a Pivotal Control Point for Lipogenesis vs. Respiration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Desiree DeMille; Jenny A Pape; Benjamin T Bikman; Majid Ghassemian; Julianne H Grose
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.154

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.