Literature DB >> 20819921

Biomechanical characterization of an osteoporotic artificial bone model for the distal femur.

Dirk Wähnert1, Konrad L Hoffmeier, Kajetan Klos, Yves Stolarczyk, Rosemarie Fröber, Gunther O Hofmann, Thomas Mückley.   

Abstract

The treatment of osteoporotic distal femur fractures is still an unsolved problem of trauma surgery. The poor bone stock often leads to secondary loss of reduction and implant failure. Therefore, the development of new implants and their biomechanical testing is essential. In a previous study, we developed and initially characterized an artificial osteoporotic bone model of the distal femur. This follow-up study was performed to characterize this model in a biomechanical comparison. We investigated two different artificial bones: five foam cortical shell (Sawbones) and 10 custom-made artificial femoral condyles. Additionally, eight human femora were used for comparison. For biomechanical testing, two intramedullary nails (distal femur nail (DFN) and supracondylar nail (SCN)) were cyclically axial loaded in an AO 33 C2 unstable distal femoral fracture model. In our testing, the artificial bone showed a decrease in the axial stiffness of 27% for the SCN and 28% for the DFN compared to the human results. Also the number of cycles for a deformation of 2.5 mm was reduced by 55% (SCN) and 62% (DFN). This decrease was homogenous and caused by the relative high bone mineral density of the human specimen used. The modes of failure showed no difference between the artificial and human bones. Our customized artificial bone provides suitable results. In relation to the human bones classified as mildly osteoporotic, we assume that the biomechanical properties match to serve as an osteoporotic bone. Yet, we suggest to check transferability of the results with human material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20819921     DOI: 10.1177/0885328210378057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomater Appl        ISSN: 0885-3282            Impact factor:   2.646


  5 in total

1.  Optimal blocking screw placement for retrograde IM nail fixation of distal femur fracture: a standardized biomechanical study of "osteoporotic" synthetic bone.

Authors:  R Yakkanti; J Kitchen; M Voor; J Nyland; B Hartley
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  A New System for Periprosthetic Fracture Stabilization-A Biomechanical Comparison.

Authors:  Daniel Rau; Gabriele Rußow; Mark Heyland; Dag Wulsten; Clemens Kösters; Werner Schmölz; Sven Märdian
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Femur Strength is Similar Before and After Iatrogenic Fracture During Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Analysis.

Authors:  Bailey J Ross; Akshar H Patel; J Heath Wilder; John M Weldy; Charles S Dranoff; Matthew J Weintraub; Nathan E Kim; Hao Wang; William F Sherman
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-04-04

4.  Biomechanical Comparison of Five Fixation Techniques for Unstable Fragility Fractures of the Pelvic Ring.

Authors:  Moritz F Lodde; J Christoph Katthagen; Clemens O Schopper; Ivan Zderic; Geoff Richards; Boyko Gueorguiev; Michael J Raschke; René Hartensuer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Does Cement Augmentation of the Sacroiliac Screw Lead to Superior Biomechanical Results for Fixation of the Posterior Pelvic Ring? A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Moritz F Lodde; J Christoph Katthagen; Clemens O Schopper; Ivan Zderic; R Geoff Richards; Boyko Gueorguiev; Michael J Raschke; René Hartensuer
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.