Literature DB >> 20819867

Errors and electronic prescribing: a controlled laboratory study to examine task complexity and interruption effects.

Farah Magrabi1, Simon Y W Li, Richard O Day, Enrico Coiera.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of interruptions and task complexity on error rates when prescribing with computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems, and to categorize the types of prescribing errors.
DESIGN: Two within-subject factors: task complexity (complex vs simple) and interruption (interruption vs no interruption). Thirty-two hospital doctors used a CPOE system in a computer laboratory to complete four prescribing tasks, half of which were interrupted using a counterbalanced design. MEASUREMENTS: Types of prescribing errors, error rate, resumption lag, and task completion time.
RESULTS: Errors in creating and updating electronic medication charts that were measured included failure to enter allergy information; selection of incorrect medication, dose, route, formulation, or frequency of administration from lists and drop-down menus presented by the CPOE system; incorrect entry or omission in entering administration times, start date, and free-text qualifiers; and omissions in prescribing and ceasing medications. When errors occurred, the error rates across the four prescribing tasks ranged from 0.5% (1 incorrect medication selected out of 192 chances for selecting a medication or error opportunities) to 16% (5 failures to enter allergy information out of 32 error opportunities). Any impact of interruptions on prescribing error rates and task completion times was not detected in our experiment. However, complex tasks took significantly longer to complete (F(1, 27)=137.9; p<0.001) and when execution was interrupted they required almost three times longer to resume compared to simple tasks (resumption lag complex=9.6 seconds, SD=5.6; resumption lag simple=3.4 seconds, SD=1.7; t(28)=6.186; p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Most electronic prescribing errors found in this study could be described as slips in using the CPOE system to create and update electronic medication charts. Cues available within the user interface may have aided resumption of interrupted tasks making CPOE systems robust to some interruption effects. Further experiments are required to rule out any effect interruption might have on CPOE error rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20819867      PMCID: PMC2995669          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2009.001719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  20 in total

1.  Improving clinical communication: a view from psychology.

Authors:  J Parker; E Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Effect of a computerized prescriber-order-entry system on reported medication errors.

Authors:  Donald C Spencer; Aaron Leininger; Rowell Daniels; Robert P Granko; Remy R Coeytaux
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.637

3.  Effects of an integrated clinical information system on medication safety in a multi-hospital setting.

Authors:  Charles D Mahoney; Christine M Berard-Collins; Reid Coleman; Joseph F Amaral; Carole M Cotter
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 2.637

4.  Interruption of the Tower of London task: support for a goal-activation approach.

Authors:  Helen M Hodgetts; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-02

5.  Communication behaviours in a hospital setting: an observational study.

Authors:  E Coiera; V Tombs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-28

6.  Clinical communication: a new informatics paradigm.

Authors:  E Coiera
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1996

Review 7.  Interruptions and distractions in healthcare: review and reappraisal.

Authors:  A J Rivera-Rodriguez; B-T Karsh
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-04-08

8.  Potential benefits and problems with computerized prescriber order entry: analysis of a voluntary medication error-reporting database.

Authors:  Chunliu Zhan; Rodney W Hicks; Christopher M Blanchette; Margaret A Keyes; Diane D Cousins
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.637

9.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors.

Authors:  Ross Koppel; Joshua P Metlay; Abigail Cohen; Brian Abaluck; A Russell Localio; Stephen E Kimmel; Brian L Strom
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Medication errors: a prospective cohort study of hand-written and computerised physician order entry in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Rob Shulman; Mervyn Singer; John Goldstone; Geoff Bellingan
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  20 in total

1.  The dangerous decade.

Authors:  Enrico Coiera; Jos Aarts; Casimir Kulikowski
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  In Reply.

Authors:  Karen C Nanji; David W Bates
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Computerized physician order entry: promise, perils, and experience.

Authors:  Raman Khanna; Tony Yen
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2014-01

4.  Errors associated with outpatient computerized prescribing systems.

Authors:  Karen C Nanji; Jeffrey M Rothschild; Claudia Salzberg; Carol A Keohane; Katherine Zigmont; Jim Devita; Tejal K Gandhi; Anuj K Dalal; David W Bates; Eric G Poon
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  A systematic review of the psychological literature on interruption and its patient safety implications.

Authors:  Simon Y W Li; Farah Magrabi; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  The impact of intra-operative interruptions on surgeons' perceived workload: an observational study in elective general and orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Matthias Weigl; Sophia Antoniadis; Costanza Chiapponi; Christiane Bruns; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Characteristics of distractions in the intensive care unit: how serious are they and who are at risk?

Authors:  Kay Choong See; Jason Phua; Amartya Mukhopadhyay; Tow Keang Lim
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.858

8.  Identifying complexity in infectious diseases inpatient settings: An observation study.

Authors:  Don Roosan; Charlene Weir; Matthew Samore; Makoto Jones; Mumtahena Rahman; Gregory J Stoddard; Guilherme Del Fiol
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 9.  Prescribing errors in hospital practice.

Authors:  Mary P Tully
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 10.  E-prescribing: a focused review and new approach to addressing safety in pharmacies and primary care.

Authors:  Olufunmilola K Odukoya; Michelle A Chui
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2012-10-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.