Literature DB >> 20818956

Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: screening by systolic diastolic and mean arterial pressure at 11-13 weeks.

Leona C Y Poon1, Nikos A Kametas, Catalina Valencia, Teodora Chelemen, Kypros H Nicolaides.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the performance of screening for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and to compare systolic blood pressure (BP), diastolic BP, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) measured by validated automated devices in a large population of pregnant women at 11-13 weeks.
METHODS: We recorded maternal variables and measured BP by automated devices in 9149 women with singleton pregnancies. The performance of screening for preeclampsia (PE) and gestational hypertension (GH) by combinations of disease-specific maternal factor-derived a priori risk with systolic BP, diastolic BP, and MAP was determined.
RESULTS: There were 8061 cases that were unaffected by PE or GH, 37 that developed PE requiring delivery before 34 weeks (early-PE), 128 with late-PE, and 140 with GH. The systolic BP, diastolic BP, and MAP were significantly higher in early-PE, late-PE, and GH than in the controls (p < 0.0001). The systolic BP was significantly higher in early-PE than in late-PE (p = 0.008) and both systolic BP and MAP were significantly higher in early-PE than in GH (p < 0.01). The best performance in screening was provided by MAP. The detection rate of early-PE at a 10% false-positive rate increased from 47% in screening by maternal factor-derived a priori risk alone to 76% in screening by its combination with MAP. The respective detection rates for late-PE increased from 41 to 52% and for GH increased from 31 to 48%.
CONCLUSION: The measurement of BP can be combined with the maternal factor-derived a priori risk to provide effective first-trimester screening for PE and GH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20818956     DOI: 10.3109/10641955.2010.484086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Pregnancy        ISSN: 1064-1955            Impact factor:   2.108


  13 in total

1.  Aspirin in the prevention of preeclampsia: the conundrum of how, who and when.

Authors:  Renuka Shanmugalingam; Annemarie Hennessy; Angela Makris
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Maternal clinic and home blood pressure measurements during pregnancy and infant birth weight: the BOSHI study.

Authors:  Noriyuki Iwama; Hirohito Metoki; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Mami Ishikuro; Taku Obara; Masahiro Kikuya; Katsuyo Yagihashi; Hidekazu Nishigori; Takashi Sugiyama; Junichi Sugawara; Nobuo Yaegashi; Kazuhiko Hoshi; Masakuni Suzuki; Shinichi Kuriyama; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention.

Authors:  Liona C Poon; Andrew Shennan; Jonathan A Hyett; Anil Kapur; Eran Hadar; Hema Divakar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Fabricio da Silva Costa; Peter von Dadelszen; Harold David McIntyre; Anne B Kihara; Gian Carlo Di Renzo; Roberto Romero; Mary D'Alton; Vincenzo Berghella; Kypros H Nicolaides; Moshe Hod
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  Blood pressure change in normotensive, gestational hypertensive, preeclamptic, and essential hypertensive pregnancies.

Authors:  Corrie Macdonald-Wallis; Debbie A Lawlor; Abigail Fraser; Margaret May; Scott M Nelson; Kate Tilling
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Levels of key enzymes of methionine-homocysteine metabolism in preeclampsia.

Authors:  Alejandra Pérez-Sepúlveda; Pedro P España-Perrot; Ximena B Fernández; Verónica Ahumada; Vicente Bustos; José Antonio Arraztoa; Aneta Dobierzewska; Horacio Figueroa-Diesel; Gregory E Rice; Sebastián E Illanes
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Screening models using multiple markers for early detection of late-onset preeclampsia in low-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  Hee Jin Park; Soo Hyun Kim; Yong Wook Jung; Sung Shin Shim; Ji Yeon Kim; Yeon Kyung Cho; Antonio Farina; Margherita Zanello; Kyoung Jin Lee; Dong Hyun Cha
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 7.  Early prediction of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Leona C Poon; Kypros H Nicolaides
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2014-07-17

8.  Integrated Proteomic and Metabolomic prediction of Term Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Ray Bahado-Singh; Liona C Poon; Ali Yilmaz; Argyro Syngelaki; Onur Turkoglu; Praveen Kumar; Joseph Kirma; Matthew Allos; Veronica Accurti; Jiansheng Li; Peng Zhao; Stewart F Graham; David R Cool; Kypros Nicolaides
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Early detection of maternal risk for preeclampsia.

Authors:  B Mikat; A Gellhaus; N Wagner; C Birdir; R Kimmig; A Köninger
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-07-17

10.  Clinical prediction in early pregnancy of infants small for gestational age by customised birthweight centiles: findings from a healthy nulliparous cohort.

Authors:  Lesley M E McCowan; John M D Thompson; Rennae S Taylor; Robyn A North; Lucilla Poston; Philip N Baker; Jenny Myers; Claire T Roberts; Gustaaf A Dekker; Nigel A B Simpson; James J Walker; Louise C Kenny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.