Literature DB >> 20816822

Deep brain stimulation of the lateral cerebellar nucleus produces frequency-specific alterations in motor evoked potentials in the rat in vivo.

Kenneth B Baker1, Daniel Schuster, Jessica Cooperrider, Andre G Machado.   

Abstract

The cerebral cortex is tightly and reciprocally linked to the cerebellum and the ascending dentato-thalalmo-cortical pathway influences widespread cortical regions. Using a rodent model of middle cerebral artery stroke, we showed previously that chronic, 20 Hz stimulation of the contralateral lateral cerebellar nucleus (LCN) improved motor recovery, while 50 Hz stimulation did not. Using motor evoked potentials (MEP) elicited by intracortical microstimulation, we now show the effect of LCN stimulation on motor cortex excitability as a function of pulse frequency in propofol-anesthetized rats. MEPs were recorded serially, at 15-s intervals, with cerebellar stimulation delivered in 10-min blocks at rates of 20, 30, 40, 50 or 100 Hz. Stimulation at 20, 30, 40 or 50 Hz enhanced the average MEP response across the block, with the maximal overall increase observed during 30 Hz stimulation. However, the effect varied as a function of both repeated trials within the block and LCN stimulation frequency, such that 40 Hz and 50 Hz stimulation showed a reduced effect over time. Stimulation at 100 Hz produced a transient increase in MEP amplitude in some animals; however the overall effect across the block was a trend towards reduced cortical excitability. These results suggest that direct stimulation of the LCN can yield frequency-dependent changes in cortical excitability and may provide a therapeutic approach to modulating cortical activity for the treatment of strokes or other focal cortical lesions, movement disorders and epilepsy.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20816822      PMCID: PMC2971530          DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0014-4886            Impact factor:   5.330


  52 in total

1.  Discharges of intracerebellar nuclear cells in monkeys.

Authors:  R J Harvey; R Porter; J A Rawson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Effects of electrically induced afferent input from limb nerves on the excitability of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  V Deletis; M R Dimitrijevic; A M Sherwood
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Modulation of cat motor evoked potential by prior cerebellar or somatosensory stimulation.

Authors:  M McCaffrey; J P Erickson
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Contribution of the dentato-thalamo-cortical system to control of motor synergy.

Authors:  L Rispal-Padel; F Cicirata; C Pons
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1981-03-10       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus in tremor dominated Parkinson's disease and essential tremor.

Authors:  F Alesch; M M Pinter; R J Helscher; L Fertl; A L Benabid; W T Koos
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  A double-blind trial of chronic cerebellar stimulation in twelve patients with severe epilepsy.

Authors:  G D Wright; D L McLellan; J G Brice
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Excitability of the motor cortex to magnetic stimulation in patients with cerebellar lesions.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; D Restuccia; M Molinari; M G Leggio; R Nardone; D Fogli; P Tonali
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Cerebellar nuclear topography of simple and synergistic movements in the alert baboon (Papio papio).

Authors:  L Rispal-Padel; F Cicirata; C Pons
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Reduction of intractable seizures using cerebellar stimulation.

Authors:  R Davis; E Gray; H Engle; A Dusnak
Journal:  Appl Neurophysiol       Date:  1983

10.  Anatomical evidence for segregated focal groupings of efferent cells and their terminal ramifications in the cerebellothalamic pathway of the monkey.

Authors:  C Asanuma; W R Thach; E G Jones
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  19 in total

1.  Chronic deep cerebellar stimulation promotes long-term potentiation, microstructural plasticity, and reorganization of perilesional cortical representation in a rodent model.

Authors:  Jessica Cooperrider; Havan Furmaga; Ela Plow; Hyun-Joo Park; Zhihong Chen; Grahame Kidd; Kenneth B Baker; John T Gale; Andre G Machado
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Invasive neurostimulation in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; Andre Machado
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Deep cerebellar stimulation reduces ataxic motor symptoms in the shaker rat.

Authors:  Collin J Anderson; Karla P Figueroa; Alan D Dorval; Stefan M Pulst
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  A Brainstem-Spinal Cord Inhibitory Circuit for Mechanical Pain Modulation by GABA and Enkephalins.

Authors:  Amaury François; Sarah A Low; Elizabeth I Sypek; Amelia J Christensen; Chaudy Sotoudeh; Kevin T Beier; Charu Ramakrishnan; Kimberly D Ritola; Reza Sharif-Naeini; Karl Deisseroth; Scott L Delp; Robert C Malenka; Liqun Luo; Adam W Hantman; Grégory Scherrer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Neurorestoration after stroke.

Authors:  Tej D Azad; Anand Veeravagu; Gary K Steinberg
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  Modulation of Cortical Motor Evoked Potential After Stroke During Electrical Stimulation of the Lateral Cerebellar Nucleus.

Authors:  Hyun-Joo Park; Havan Furmaga; Jessica Cooperrider; John T Gale; Kenneth B Baker; Andre G Machado
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 7.  Optogenetic Approaches to Target Specific Neural Circuits in Post-stroke Recovery.

Authors:  Michelle Y Cheng; Markus Aswendt; Gary K Steinberg
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.620

8.  Semi-automated method for estimating lesion volumes.

Authors:  Hyun-Joo Park; Andre G Machado; Jessica Cooperrider; Havan Truong-Furmaga; Matthew Johnson; Vibhuti Krishna; Zhihong Chen; John T Gale
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Cerebellar Neuromodulation for Stroke.

Authors:  Jessica Cooperrider; Arbaz Momin; Kenneth B Baker; Andre G Machado
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2020-02-20

10.  Epidural cerebellar stimulation drives widespread neural synchrony in the intact and stroke perilesional cortex.

Authors:  Aamir Abbasi; Nathan P Danielsen; Jennifer Leung; A K M G Muhammad; Saahil Patel; Tanuj Gulati
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.