Literature DB >> 2081472

Cell shape changes during gastrulation in Drosophila.

M Leptin1, B Grunewald.   

Abstract

The first morphogenetic movement during Drosophila development is the invagination of the mesoderm, an event that folds a one-layered epithelium into a multilayered structure. In this paper, we describe the shape changes and behaviour of the cells participating in this process and show how mutations that change cell fate affect this behaviour. We divide the formation of the mesodermal germ layer into two phases. During the first phase, the ventral epithelium folds into a tube by a series of concerted cell shape changes (ventral furrow formation). Based on the behaviour of cells in this phase, we conclude that the prospective mesoderm is not a homogeneous cell population, but consists of two subpopulations. Each subpopulation goes through a distinctive sequence of specific cell shape changes which together mediate the invagination of the ventral furrow. In the second phase, the invaginated tube of mesoderm loses its epithelial character, the mesoderm cells disperse, divide and then spread out along the ectoderm to form a single cell layer. To test how ventral furrow formation depends on cell fates in the mesoderm and in neighbouring cells we alter these fates genetically using maternal and zygotic mutations. These experiments show that some of the aspects of cell behaviour specific for ventral furrow cells are part of an autonomous differentiation programme. The force driving the invagination is generated within the region of the ventral furrow, with the lateral and dorsal cell populations contributing little or none of the force. Two known zygotic genes that are required for the formation of the mesoderm, twist and snail, are expressed in ventral furrow cells, and the correct execution of cell shape changes in the mesoderm depends on both. Finally, we show that the region where the ventral furrow forms is determined by the expression of mesoderm-specific genes, and not by mechanical or other epigenetic properties of the egg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2081472     DOI: 10.1242/dev.110.1.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  155 in total

Review 1.  Gastrulation in Drosophila: the logic and the cellular mechanisms.

Authors:  M Leptin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Transcriptional integration of competence modulated by mutual repression generates cell-type specificity within the cardiogenic mesoderm.

Authors:  Zhe Han; Miki Fujioka; Mingtsan Su; Margaret Liu; James B Jaynes; Rolf Bodmer
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  Mesoderm migration in Drosophila is a multi-step process requiring FGF signaling and integrin activity.

Authors:  Amy McMahon; Gregory T Reeves; Willy Supatto; Angelike Stathopoulos
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 4.  Role of TLR2-dependent inflammation in metastatic progression.

Authors:  Sunhwa Kim; Michael Karin
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Dorsal-ventral patterning in Drosophila: DNA binding of snail protein to the single-minded gene.

Authors:  Y Kasai; J R Nambu; P M Lieberman; S T Crews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Direct activation of Shroom3 transcription by Pitx proteins drives epithelial morphogenesis in the developing gut.

Authors:  Mei-I Chung; Nanette M Nascone-Yoder; Stephanie A Grover; Thomas A Drysdale; John B Wallingford
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  Modular activation of Rho1 by GPCR signalling imparts polarized myosin II activation during morphogenesis.

Authors:  Stephen Kerridge; Akankshi Munjal; Jean-Marc Philippe; Ankita Jha; Alain Garcia de las Bayonas; Andrew J Saurin; Thomas Lecuit
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 8.  Specification of the somatic musculature in Drosophila.

Authors:  Krista C Dobi; Victoria K Schulman; Mary K Baylies
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.814

9.  The Hox transcription factor Ubx stabilizes lineage commitment by suppressing cellular plasticity in Drosophila.

Authors:  Katrin Domsch; Julie Carnesecchi; Vanessa Disela; Jana Friedrich; Nils Trost; Olga Ermakova; Maria Polychronidou; Ingrid Lohmann
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Cell mechanics and feedback regulation of actomyosin networks.

Authors:  Rodrigo Fernandez-Gonzalez; Jennifer A Zallen
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 8.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.