Literature DB >> 20814710

Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative real-time PCR assay versus clinical and Gram stain identification of bacterial vaginosis.

J-P Menard1, C Mazouni, F Fenollar, D Raoult, L Boubli, F Bretelle.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay in diagnosing bacterial vaginosis versus the standard methods, the Amsel criteria and the Nugent score. The Amsel criteria, the Nugent score, and results from the molecular tool were obtained independently from vaginal samples of 163 pregnant women who reported abnormal vaginal symptoms before 20 weeks gestation. To determine the performance of the molecular tool, we calculated the kappa value, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Either or both of the Amsel criteria (≥3 criteria) and the Nugent score (score ≥7) indicated that 25 women (15%) had bacterial vaginosis, and the remaining 138 women did not. DNA levels of Gardnerella vaginalis or Atopobium vaginae exceeded 10(9) copies/mL or 10(8) copies/mL, respectively, in 34 (21%) of the 163 samples. Complete agreement between both reference methods and high concentrations of G. vaginalis and A. vaginae was found in 94.5% of women (154/163 samples, kappa value = 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.70-0.81). The nine samples with discordant results were categorized as intermediate flora by the Nugent score. The molecular tool predicted bacterial vaginosis with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 73%, and a negative predictive value of 100%. The quantitative real-time PCR assay shows excellent agreement with the results of both reference methods for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20814710     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-010-1039-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  22 in total

1.  An international study of the interobserver variation between interpretations of vaginal smear criteria of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  U Forsum; T Jakobsson; P G Larsson; H Schmidt; A Beverly; A Bjørnerem; B Carlsson; P Csango; G Donders; P Hay; C Ison; F Keane; H McDonald; H Moi; J-J Platz-Christensen; J Schwebke
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.205

2.  Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: need for validation of microscopic image area used for scoring bacterial morphotypes.

Authors:  P-G Larsson; B Carlsson; L Fåhraeus; T Jakobsson; U Forsum
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  The association of Atopobium vaginae and Gardnerella vaginalis with bacterial vaginosis and recurrence after oral metronidazole therapy.

Authors:  C S Bradshaw; S N Tabrizi; C K Fairley; A N Morton; E Rudland; S M Garland
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Screening for bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy to prevent preterm delivery: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Validation of a simplified grading of Gram stained vaginal smears for use in genitourinary medicine clinics.

Authors:  C A Ison; P E Hay
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis and intermediate flora as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Harald Leitich; Herbert Kiss
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 5.237

7.  Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation.

Authors:  R P Nugent; M A Krohn; S L Hillier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Vulvovaginal symptoms in women with bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Mark A Klebanoff; Jane R Schwebke; Jun Zhang; Tonja R Nansel; Kai-Fun Yu; William W Andrews
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Temporal variability of human vaginal bacteria and relationship with bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Sujatha Srinivasan; Congzhou Liu; Caroline M Mitchell; Tina L Fiedler; Katherine K Thomas; Kathy J Agnew; Jeanne M Marrazzo; David N Fredricks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations.

Authors:  R Amsel; P A Totten; C A Spiegel; K C Chen; D Eschenbach; K K Holmes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  15 in total

1.  Risk factors for bacterial vaginosis: results from a cross-sectional study having a sample of 53,652 women.

Authors:  X-D Li; C-C Wang; X-J Zhang; G-P Gao; F Tong; X Li; S Hou; L Sun; Y-H Sun
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Microbiota of the upper and lower genital tract.

Authors:  Ryan Rampersaud; Tara M Randis; Adam J Ratner
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Self-collected vaginal swabs for the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay of Atopobium vaginae and Gardnerella vaginalis and the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  J-P Menard; F Fenollar; D Raoult; L Boubli; F Bretelle
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Relationship of selected bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria to Nugent score bacterial vaginosis among urban women early in pregnancy.

Authors:  Deborah B Nelson; Eugene Komaroff; Irving Nachamkin; Catherine L Haggerty; LaVette Dibble; Dimitrios Mastrogiannis; Congzhou Liu; David N Fredricks; Fredricks N David
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Molecular diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: impact on IVF outcome.

Authors:  J Mangot-Bertrand; F Fenollar; F Bretelle; M Gamerre; D Raoult; B Courbiere
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  A multiplex real-time PCR assay for routine diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  J G Kusters; E A Reuland; S Bouter; P Koenig; J W Dorigo-Zetsma
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Diagnostic value of Amsel's clinical criteria for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Farnaz Mohammadzadeh; Mahrokh Dolatian; Masoome Jorjani; Hamid Alavi Majd
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2014-10-29

8.  Prevalence and risk factors for bacterial vaginosis and other vulvovaginitis in a population of sexually active adolescents from Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

Authors:  Rita Elizabeth Moreira Mascarenhas; Márcia Sacramento Cunha Machado; Bruno Fernando Borges da Costa e Silva; Rodrigo Fernandes Weyll Pimentel; Tatiana Teixeira Ferreira; Fernanda Maria Silva Leoni; Maria Fernanda Rios Grassi
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10-22

9.  Association between faecal load of lawsonia intracellularis and pathological findings of proliferative enteropathy in pigs with diarrhoea.

Authors:  Ken Steen Pedersen; Marie Ståhl; Roberto Maurício Carvalho Guedes; Øystein Angen; Jens Peter Nielsen; Tim K Jensen
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 10.  Anaerobes and bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy: virulence factors contributing to vaginal colonisation.

Authors:  Charlene W J Africa; Janske Nel; Megan Stemmet
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.