Literature DB >> 12473800

Validation of a simplified grading of Gram stained vaginal smears for use in genitourinary medicine clinics.

C A Ison1, P E Hay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To validate a simplified grading scheme for Gram stained smears of vaginal fluid for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis (BV) against the accepted "gold" standard of Amsel's composite criteria.
METHODS: Women attending genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics, as part of a multicentre study, were diagnosed as having BV if three or more of the following criteria were present; homogeneous discharge, elevated vaginal pH, production of amines, and presence of "clue" cells. Women with less than three of the criteria were considered as normal. Simultaneously, smears were made of vaginal fluid and Gram stained and then assessed qualitatively as normal (grade I), intermediate (grade II), or consistent with BV (grade III). Two new grades were used, grade 0, epithelial cells only with no bacteria, and grade IV, Gram positive cocci only.
RESULTS: BV was diagnosed in 83/162 patient visits using the composite criteria, the remainder being regarded as normal. The majority of patients with BV had a smear assessed as grade III (80/83, 96%) and the majority of normal women had a smear assessed as grade I (normal, 48/79, 61%), giving a high sensitivity (97.5%), specificity (96%), and predictive value for a positive (94.1%) and negative (96%) test, kappa index = 0.91. Smears assessed as grade II were found predominantly (12/13) among patients diagnosed as normal, with less than three of the composite criteria. Grades 0 and IV were both only found among normal women.
CONCLUSION: This simplified assessment of Gram stained smears can be used as an alternative to Amsel's criteria and is more applicable for use in busy GUM clinics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12473800      PMCID: PMC1758337          DOI: 10.1136/sti.78.6.413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  11 in total

1.  Haemophilus vaginalis vaginitis: a newly defined specific infection previously classified non-specific vaginitis.

Authors:  H L GARDNER; C D DUKES
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1955-05       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Simplified gram stain interpretive method for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  J L Thomason; R J Anderson; S M Gelbart; P J Osypowski; N J Scaglione; G el Tabbakh; J A James
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Validity of the vaginal gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  J R Schwebke; S L Hillier; J D Sobel; J A McGregor; R L Sweet
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Nonspecific vaginitis: role of Haemophilus vaginalis and treatment with metronidazole.

Authors:  T A Pheifer; P S Forsyth; M A Durfee; H M Pollock; K K Holmes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation.

Authors:  R P Nugent; M A Krohn; S L Hillier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Characteristics of three vaginal flora patterns assessed by gram stain among pregnant women. Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group.

Authors:  S L Hillier; M A Krohn; R P Nugent; R S Gibbs
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations.

Authors:  R Amsel; P A Totten; C A Spiegel; K C Chen; D Eschenbach; K K Holmes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by direct gram stain of vaginal fluid.

Authors:  C A Spiegel; R Amsel; K K Holmes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy: distribution of bacterial species in different gram-stain categories of the vaginal flora.

Authors:  I J Rosenstein; D J Morgan; M Sheehan; R F Lamont; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  A longitudinal study of bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy.

Authors:  P E Hay; D J Morgan; C A Ison; S A Bhide; M Romney; P McKenzie; J Pearson; R F Lamont; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1994-12
View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of abnormal vaginal flora in early pregnancy with clindamycin for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Ronald F Lamont; Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang; Jack D Sobel; Kimberly Workowski; Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: need for validation of microscopic image area used for scoring bacterial morphotypes.

Authors:  P-G Larsson; B Carlsson; L Fåhraeus; T Jakobsson; U Forsum
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 3.  Vaginal microbiome and sexually transmitted infections: an epidemiologic perspective.

Authors:  Rebecca M Brotman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Multiplex detection of bacteria in complex clinical and environmental samples using oligonucleotide-coupled fluorescent microspheres.

Authors:  Tim J Dumonceaux; Jennifer R Town; Janet E Hill; Bonnie L Chaban; Sean M Hemmingsen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-10-23       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Methods employed by genitourinary medicine clinics in the United Kingdom to diagnose bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  F E A Keane; R Maw; C Pritchard; C A Ison
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  F Keane; C A Ison; H Noble; C Estcourt
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.519

7.  Development and validation of a semiquantitative, multitarget PCR assay for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Charles P Cartwright; Bryndon D Lembke; Kalpana Ramachandran; Barbara A Body; Melinda B Nye; Charles A Rivers; Jane R Schwebke
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Targeted PCR for detection of vaginal bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  David N Fredricks; Tina L Fiedler; Katherine K Thomas; Brian B Oakley; Jeanne M Marrazzo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Bacterial vaginosis diagnosed by analysis of first-void-urine specimens.

Authors:  Raluca Datcu; Dionne Gesink; Gert Mulvad; Ruth Montgomery-Andersen; Elisabeth Rink; Anders Koch; Peter Ahrens; Jørgen Skov Jensen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Identification and genotyping of bacteria from paired vaginal and rectal samples from pregnant women indicates similarity between vaginal and rectal microflora.

Authors:  Nabil Abdullah El Aila; Inge Tency; Geert Claeys; Hans Verstraelen; Bart Saerens; Guido Lopes Dos Santos Santiago; Ellen De Backer; Piet Cools; Marleen Temmerman; Rita Verhelst; Mario Vaneechoutte
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.