Literature DB >> 20814697

Individual and social predictors of screen-viewing among Spanish school children.

Itziar Hoyos Cillero1, Russell Jago, Simon Sebire.   

Abstract

Many children exceed suggested screen-viewing guidelines and this is likely to be a risk factor for obesity. Understanding the predictors of screen-viewing may be the first step in designing interventions that target these behaviours, but there is lack of information on predictors among Spanish children. This study examined associations between individual, friend and family based social variables and screen-viewing behaviours, and how these associations differ by age and gender in a sample of Spanish children. Participants were 247 primary school-aged and 256 secondary school-aged children and their parents. Children reported time spent in screen-viewing and information about individual and friend and family based social variables. Body mass index was assessed and children were classified using International Obesity Task Force cut-off points. Parents reported sociodemographic characteristics and family co-viewing practices. Lower self-efficacy for reducing screen-viewing (console playing p < 0.05; overall p < 0.01), stronger sedentary group-norms (TV p < 0.001; console playing p < 0.05; overall p < 0.05) and stronger social reasons (console playing p < 0.05) were associated with higher screen-viewing. For younger children, parental screen-viewing rules appeared to be significant predictors while family co-viewing practices were significant predictors for older children. Older children (TV p < 0.001; console playing p < 0.01; overall p < 0.001) and males (TV p < 0.01; console playing p < 0.001; overall p < 0.01) were likely to spend more time screen-viewing. Individual and social factors influence children's screen-viewing and operate differently during childhood. Increasing self-efficacy may be important for screen-viewing based behaviour changes. Friends and parents play a central role, therefore understanding the dynamics of friends and targeting family influences may be critical to the success of interventions to reduce screen-viewing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20814697     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-010-1276-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  43 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the mechanisms of change in children's physical activity programs.

Authors:  Tom Baranowski; Russell Jago
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.230

Review 2.  Measurement of television viewing in children and adolescents: a systematic review.

Authors:  M J Bryant; J C Lucove; K R Evenson; S Marshall
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 9.213

3.  American Academy of Pediatrics: Children, adolescents, and television.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Tracking of activity and sedentary behaviors in childhood: the Iowa Bone Development Study.

Authors:  Kathleen F Janz; Trudy L Burns; Steven M Levy
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Television, computer use and body mass index in Australian primary school children.

Authors:  M Wake; K Hesketh; E Waters
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.954

6.  Television viewing and food habits in toddlers and preschoolers in Greece: the GENESIS study.

Authors:  Yannis Manios; Katerina Kondaki; Georgia Kourlaba; Evangelia Grammatikaki; Manolis Birbilis; Elina Ioannou
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  Longitudinal changes in the time parents spend in activities with their adolescent children as a function of child age, pubertal status, and gender.

Authors:  Judith Semon Dubas; Jan R M Gerris
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2002-12

8.  Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey.

Authors:  T J Cole; M C Bellizzi; K M Flegal; W H Dietz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06

9.  Development of scales to assess children's perceptions of friend and parental influences on physical activity.

Authors:  Russell Jago; Kenneth R Fox; Angie S Page; Rowan Brockman; Janice L Thompson
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Friendship groups and physical activity: qualitative findings on how physical activity is initiated and maintained among 10-11 year old children.

Authors:  Russell Jago; Rowan Brockman; Kenneth R Fox; Kim Cartwright; Angie S Page; Janice L Thompson
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 6.457

View more
  16 in total

1.  Houston... We have a problem! Measurement of parenting.

Authors:  Tom Baranowski; Teresia O'Connor; Sheryl Hughes; Ester Sleddens; Alicia Beltran; Leslie Frankel; Jason A Mendoza; Janice Baranowski
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 2.  Cognitive and Motivational Factors Associated with Sedentary Behavior: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Scott Rollo; Anca Gaston; Harry Prapavessis
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2016-11-28

3.  Screen-Related Parenting Practices in Low-Income Mexican American Families.

Authors:  Darcy A Thompson; Sarah J Schmiege; Susan L Johnson; Elizabeth A Vandewater; Richard E Boles; Ruth E Zambrana; Jerusha Lev; Jeanne M Tschann
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Temporal trends and recent correlates in sedentary behaviours in Chinese children.

Authors:  Zhaohui Cui; Louise L Hardy; Michael J Dibley; Adrian Bauman
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  Parental control, nurturance, self-efficacy, and screen viewing among 5- to 6-year-old children: a cross-sectional mediation analysis to inform potential behavior change strategies.

Authors:  Russell Jago; Lesley Wood; Jesmond Zahra; Janice L Thompson; Simon J Sebire
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.992

6.  Virtually impossible: limiting Australian children and adolescents daily screen based media use.

Authors:  Stephen Houghton; Simon C Hunter; Michael Rosenberg; Lisa Wood; Corinne Zadow; Karen Martin; Trevor Shilton
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Association between screen viewing duration and sleep duration, sleep quality, and excessive daytime sleepiness among adolescents in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Yim Wah Mak; Cynthia Sau Ting Wu; Donna Wing Shun Hui; Siu Ping Lam; Hei Yin Tse; Wing Yan Yu; Ho Ting Wong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Predictors and health consequences of screen-time change during adolescence--1993 Pelotas (Brazil) birth cohort study.

Authors:  Samuel Carvalho Dumith; Leandro Martin Totaro Garcia; Kelly Samara da Silva; Ana Maria Baptista Menezes; Pedro Curi Hallal
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 5.012

9.  Changes in screen time activity in Norwegian children from 2001 to 2008: two cross sectional studies.

Authors:  Nina C Øverby; Knut-Inge Klepp; Elling Bere
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Protocol for a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of a peer-led school-based intervention to increase the physical activity of adolescent girls (PLAN-A).

Authors:  Simon J Sebire; Mark J Edwards; Rona Campbell; Russell Jago; Ruth Kipping; Kathryn Banfield; Keeley Tomkinson; Kirsty Garfield; Ronan A Lyons; Joanne Simon; Peter S Blair; William Hollingworth
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2016-01-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.