Literature DB >> 20814260

An overview of newborn screening.

Paul A Levy1.   

Abstract

This review of newborn screening examines the beginning of screening with the story of phenylketonuria and explores the principles of screening and the criteria with which disorders were added to newborn screening panels. The explosion of tests that are screened for followed the adoption of tandem mass spectrometry (MS-MS) technology. The inequity of state newborn screening panels was brought to the forefront with an American Academy of Pediatrics task force report in 2000 that called for a national panel. The American College of Medical Genetics convened an expert panel to produce such a panel. In 2006, they published their panel of disorders, recommending a panel of 29 core disorders and 25 additional secondary targets. Ethical arguments about newborn screening have resurfaced with the recent expansion of testing that include arguments about consent, mandatory participation, benefits to those screened, and cost-both to the individual and society. Finally, the future direction of screening is discussed. Newborn screening is undergoing rapid expansion. The addition of tests involves ethical, financial, and social pressures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20814260     DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3181eedf01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr        ISSN: 0196-206X            Impact factor:   2.225


  17 in total

1.  N-Glycan profiling of dried blood spots.

Authors:  L Renee Ruhaak; Suzanne Miyamoto; Karen Kelly; Carlito B Lebrilla
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Genetics and bioethics: how our thinking has changed since 1969.

Authors:  LeRoy Walters
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2012-02

3.  Charting a course for genomic medicine from base pairs to bedside.

Authors:  Eric D Green; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Genomics and perinatal care.

Authors:  Joann Bodurtha; Jerome F Strauss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Genetics professionals' opinions of whole-genome sequencing in the newborn period.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ulm; W Gregory Feero; Richard Dineen; Joel Charrow; Catherine Wicklund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Newborn screening for lysosomal diseases: current status and potential interface with population medical genetics in Latin America.

Authors:  Roberto Giugliani
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.982

7.  Applying public health screening criteria: how does universal newborn screening compare to universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome in adults with colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Rita D DeBate; Tuya Pal
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Introduction to the special section on genomics.

Authors:  Elena L Grigorenko; Mary Dozier
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb

9.  Public support for neonatal screening for Pompe disease, a broad-phenotype condition.

Authors:  Stephanie Shifra Weinreich; Tessel Rigter; Carla Geertruida van El; Wybo Jan Dondorp; Pieter Johannes Kostense; Ans T van der Ploeg; Arnold J J Reuser; Martina Cornelia Cornel; Marloes Louise Catharina Hagemans
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 4.123

10.  A simple method to quantitate IP-10 in dried blood and plasma spots.

Authors:  Martine G Aabye; Jesper Eugen-Olsen; Anne Marie Werlinrud; Line Lindebo Holm; Tamara Tuuminen; Pernille Ravn; Morten Ruhwald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.