Literature DB >> 20811294

Evaluating 24-h antihypertensive efficacy by the smoothness index: a meta-analysis of an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring database.

Gianfranco Parati1, Helmut Schumacher, Grzegorz Bilo, Giuseppe Mancia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the 24-h antihypertensive efficacy of different treatments using the smoothness index.
METHODS: Data were taken from the telmisartan ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) clinical programme. Eleven clinical trials that randomized mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients to treatment with telmisartan 40/80 mg, losartan 50 mg, valsartan 80/160 mg, ramipril 10 mg, amlodipine 5 mg monotherapy, or with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5/25 mg, were included. Treatment duration ranged from 4 to 14 weeks. The smoothness index was calculated according to the published formula.
RESULTS: Altogether, 5188 patients were included (65% men; 52% were using telmisartan as monotherapy or in combination with HCTZ). Telmisartan 80 mg had a higher smoothness index than losartan, valsartan or ramipril (P < 0.05), and was comparable with amlodipine. All combination therapies had a higher smoothness index than monotherapy; the largest value was observed with telmisartan 80 mg and HCTZ 12.5 mg. Overall, the smoothness index was lower in men, older patients, black patients, smokers and in those with lower baseline blood pressure (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The smoothness index was affected by age, race, sex, behavioural and haemodynamic factors. It was also able to differentiate the 24-h blood pressure effects of antihypertensive drugs, with telmisartan and amlodipine achieving the highest values, possibly because of their long plasma half-lives. All combination therapies had a higher smoothness index than monotherapy. An understanding of the relative effects of different antihypertensives on the smoothness index may help to differentiate their effectiveness in reducing blood pressure-related cardiovascular risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20811294     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833e1150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  15 in total

Review 1.  Blood pressure variability: assessment, predictive value, and potential as a therapeutic target.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Juan Eugenio Ochoa; Carolina Lombardi; Grzegorz Bilo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to guide hypertensive therapy.

Authors:  Amita Singh; Eugenia Gianos; Arthur Schwartzbard; Henry Black; Howard Weintraub
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-12

3.  Sex differences in cardiovascular adaptations in recreational marathon runners.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Augustine; Wesley K Lefferts; Jacob P DeBlois; Tiago V Barreira; Beth A Taylor; Kan Liu; Kevin S Heffernan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  The importance of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients at risk of cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Josep Redon
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2013-03-27

Review 5.  Hypertension and chronic kidney disease progression: why the suboptimal outcomes?

Authors:  Anil K Bidani; Karen A Griffin; Murray Epstein
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 6.  Hypertension, Blood Pressure Variability, and Target Organ Lesion.

Authors:  Maria-Cláudia Irigoyen; Kátia De Angelis; Fernando Dos Santos; Daniela R Dartora; Bruno Rodrigues; Fernanda Marciano Consolim-Colombo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.369

7.  Comparative efficacy of aliskiren/valsartan vs valsartan in nocturnal dipper and nondipper hypertensive patients: a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Thomas D Giles; Thomas Alessi; Das Purkayastha; Dion Zappe
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Blood pressure variability: clinical relevance and application.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; George S Stergiou; Eamon Dolan; Grzegorz Bilo
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 9.  What is a preferred angiotensin II receptor blocker-based combination therapy for blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with diabetic and non-diabetic renal impairment?

Authors:  Samir G Mallat
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 9.951

Review 10.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring over 24 h: A Latin American Society of Hypertension position paper-accessibility, clinical use and cost effectiveness of ABPM in Latin America in year 2020.

Authors:  Ramiro A Sánchez; José Boggia; Ernesto Peñaherrera; Weimar Sebba Barroso; Eduardo Barbosa; Raúl Villar; Leonardo Cobos; Rafael Hernández Hernández; Jesús Lopez; José Andrés Octavio; José Z Parra Carrillo; Agustín J Ramírez; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.