Literature DB >> 20810890

Population coding of interaural time differences in gerbils and barn owls.

Nicholas A Lesica1, Andrea Lingner, Benedikt Grothe.   

Abstract

Interaural time differences (ITDs) are the primary cue for the localization of low-frequency sound sources in the azimuthal plane. For decades, it was assumed that the coding of ITDs in the mammalian brain was similar to that in the avian brain, where information is sparsely distributed across individual neurons, but recent studies have suggested otherwise. In this study, we characterized the representation of ITDs in adult male and female gerbils. First, we performed behavioral experiments to determine the acuity with which gerbils can use ITDs to localize sounds. Next, we used different decoders to infer ITDs from the activity of a population of neurons in central nucleus of the inferior colliculus. These results show that ITDs are not represented in a distributed manner, but rather in the summed activity of the entire population. To contrast these results with those from a population where the representation of ITDs is known to be sparsely distributed, we performed the same analysis on activity from the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus of adult male and female barn owls. Together, our results support the idea that, unlike the avian brain, the mammalian brain represents ITDs in the overall activity of a homogenous population of neurons within each hemisphere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20810890      PMCID: PMC6633420          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0846-10.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  26 in total

1.  Independent population coding of speech with sub-millisecond precision.

Authors:  Jose A Garcia-Lazaro; Lucile A C Belliveau; Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The neural representation of interaural time differences in gerbils is transformed from midbrain to cortex.

Authors:  Lucile A C Belliveau; Dmitry R Lyamzin; Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Multisensory training improves auditory spatial processing following bilateral cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Amal Isaiah; Tara Vongpaisal; Andrew J King; Douglas E H Hartley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Envelope contributions to the representation of interaural time difference in the forebrain of barn owls.

Authors:  Philipp Tellers; Jessica Lehmann; Hartmut Führ; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Sound localization: Jeffress and beyond.

Authors:  Go Ashida; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Input timing for spatial processing is precisely tuned via constant synaptic delays and myelination patterns in the auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Annette Stange-Marten; Alisha L Nabel; James L Sinclair; Matthew Fischl; Olga Alexandrova; Hilde Wohlfrom; Conny Kopp-Scheinpflug; Michael Pecka; Benedikt Grothe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Sound-localization ability of the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) in a task with a simplified response map.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney; Srijata Sarkar; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The effects of interaural time difference and intensity on the coding of low-frequency sounds in the mammalian midbrain.

Authors:  Domonkos Horvath; Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Neural correlates of the perception of sound source separation.

Authors:  Mitchell L Day; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  The acoustical cues to sound location in the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus).

Authors:  Nathaniel T Greene; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Whitney Williams; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.