Literature DB >> 20810678

Mycoplasma agassizii strain variation and distinct host antibody responses explain differences between enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and Western blot assays.

Lori D Wendland1, Paul A Klein, Elliott R Jacobson, Mary B Brown.   

Abstract

The precarious status of desert (Gopherus agassizii) and gopher (G. polyphemus) tortoises has resulted in conservation efforts that now include health assessment as an important component of management decision-making. Mycoplasmal upper respiratory tract disease (URTD) is one of very few diseases in chelonians for which comprehensive and rigorously validated diagnostic tests exist. In this study, serum samples obtained from eight Gopherus tortoises documented at necropsy to (i) be enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) seropositive using the PS6 antigen, (ii) be infected with Mycoplasma agassizii as indicated by direct isolation of the pathogen from the respiratory surfaces, and (iii) have histological lesions of mycoplasmal URTD were used to evaluate four distinct clinical isolates of M. agassizii as antigens for ELISA and Western blot analyses. Each animal sample reacted in the Western blot with its homologous M. agassizii strain, but recognition of heterologous M. agassizii strains was variable. Further, individual animals varied significantly with respect to the specific proteins recognized by the humoral immune response. An additional 114 Gopherus serum samples were evaluated using ELISA antigens prepared from the four distinct M. agassizii strains; A₄₀₅ values were significantly correlated (r² goodness of fit range, 0.708 to 0.771; P < 0.0001) for all antigens tested. The results confirm that strain variation is responsible for the observed differences between Western blot binding patterns. Thus, reliance on a single M. agassizii strain as an antigen in Western blot assays may provide false-negative results. This could have adverse consequences for the well-being of these environmentally sensitive hosts if false-negative animals were relocated to sites consisting of true-negative populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20810678      PMCID: PMC2976081          DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00215-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol        ISSN: 1556-679X


  40 in total

1.  Phenotypic switching in mycoplasmas: phase variation of diverse surface lipoproteins.

Authors:  R Rosengarten; K S Wise
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Comparison of four diagnostic tests for the identification of serum antibodies in small ruminants infected with Mycoplasma agalactiae.

Authors:  R Kittelberger; J S O'Keefe; R Meynell; M Sewell; S Rosati; M Lambert; P Dufour; M Pépin
Journal:  N Z Vet J       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.628

3.  Comparison of Mycoplasma agalactiae isolates by pulsed field gel electrophoresis, SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.

Authors:  S Tola; G Idini; D Manunta; I Casciano; A M Rocchigiani; A Angioi; G Leori
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 4.  Molecular biology of mycoplasmas.

Authors:  K Dybvig; L L Voelker
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 15.500

5.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Seroepidemiology of upper respiratory tract disease in the desert tortoise in the western Mojave Desert of California.

Authors:  M B Brown; K H Berry; I M Schumacher; K A Nagy; M M Christopher; P A Klein
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.535

7.  Persistence of maternal antibodies against Mycoplasma agassizii in desert tortoise hatchlings.

Authors:  I M Schumacher; D C Rostal; R A Yates; D R Brown; E R Jacobson; P A Klein
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.156

8.  Western blot immunoassay as a confirmatory test for the presence of anti-Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae antibodies in swine serum.

Authors:  Mehrdad Ameri; En-Min Zhou; Walter H Hsu
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.279

9.  The humoral immune response of chickens to Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae studied by immunoblotting.

Authors:  A P Avakian; S H Kleven
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Variable expression and geographic distribution of Mycoplasma agalactiae surface epitopes demonstrated with monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  D Bergonier; F De Simone; P Russo; M Solsona; M Lambert; F Poumarat
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 2.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.