Literature DB >> 20810440

Individual-learning ability predicts social-foraging strategy in house sparrows.

Edith Katsnelson1, Uzi Motro, Marcus W Feldman, Arnon Lotem.   

Abstract

Social foragers can use either a 'producer' strategy, which involves searching for food, or a 'scrounger' strategy, which involves joining others' food discoveries. While producers rely on personal information and past experience, we may ask whether the tendency to forage as a producer is related to being a better learner. To answer this question, we hand-raised house sparrow (Passer domesticus) nestlings that upon independence were given an individual-learning task that required them to associate colour signal and food presence. Following the testing phase, all fledglings were released into a shared aviary, and their social-foraging tendencies were measured. We found a significant positive correlation between individual's performance in the individual-learning task and subsequent tendency to use searching (producing) behaviour. Individual-learning score was negatively correlated with initial fear of the test apparatus and with body weight. However, the correlation between individual learning and searching remained significant after controlling for these variables. Since it was measured before the birds entered a social group, individual-learning ability could not be the outcome of being a producer. However, the two traits may be initially associated, or individual learning could facilitate producing behaviour. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence that associates individual-learning abilities with social-foraging strategies in animal groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20810440      PMCID: PMC3025675          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  25 in total

1.  Individual differences in the expression of a "general" learning ability in mice.

Authors:  Louis D Matzel; Yu Ray Han; Henya Grossman; Meghana S Karnik; Dave Patel; Nicholas Scott; Steven M Specht; Chetan C Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Social learning strategies.

Authors:  Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Selection for conditionability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K L Lofdahl; M Holliday; J Hirsch
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 4.  Future directions in behavioural syndromes research.

Authors:  Alison M Bell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Denis Réale; Simon M Reader; Daniel Sol; Peter T McDougall; Niels J Dingemanse
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2007-05

6.  Life-history trade-offs favour the evolution of animal personalities.

Authors:  Max Wolf; G Sander van Doorn; Olof Leimar; Franz J Weissing
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  EvoDevo and niche construction: building bridges.

Authors:  Kevin N Laland; John Odling-Smee; Scott F Gilbert
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 2.656

8.  Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals.

Authors:  D Sloan Wilson; A B Clark; K Coleman; T Dearstyne
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Assessing reliability, heritability and general cognitive ability in a battery of cognitive tasks for laboratory mice.

Authors:  Michael J Galsworthy; Jose L Paya-Cano; Lin Liu; Santiago Monleón; Gregory Gregoryan; Cathy Fernandes; Leonard C Schalkwyk; Robert Plomin
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  Individual differences in the use of social information in foraging by captive great tits.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.844

View more
  17 in total

1.  Evolution of social learning when high expected payoffs are associated with high risk of failure.

Authors:  Michal Arbilly; Uzi Motro; Marcus W Feldman; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Neural responses in songbird forebrain reflect learning rates, acquired salience, and stimulus novelty after auditory discrimination training.

Authors:  Brittany A Bell; Mimi L Phan; David S Vicario
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Trial-and-error copying of demonstrated actions reveals how fledglings learn to 'imitate' their mothers.

Authors:  Noa Truskanov; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: a behavioural ecology perspective.

Authors:  Andrew Sih; Marco Del Giudice
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Foraging errors play a role in resource exploration by bumble bees (Bombus terrrestris).

Authors:  Lisa J Evans; Nigel E Raine
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Nest prospecting brown-headed cowbirds 'parasitize' social information when the value of personal information is lacking.

Authors:  David J White; Hayden B Davies; Samuel Agyapong; Nora Seegmiller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Interindividual variation in the use of social information during learning in honeybees.

Authors:  Catherine Tait; Dhruba Naug
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Evolution of learning strategies in temporally and spatially variable environments: a review of theory.

Authors:  Kenichi Aoki; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 1.570

9.  LEARNING TO CHOOSE AMONG SOCIAL FORAGING STRATEGIES IN ADULT HOUSE SPARROWS (Passer domesticus).

Authors:  Amos Belmaker; Uzi Motro; Marcus W Feldman; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  Ethology       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 1.897

10.  An arms race between producers and scroungers can drive the evolution of social cognition.

Authors:  Michal Arbilly; Daniel B Weissman; Marcus W Feldman; Uri Grodzinski
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.