BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Reducing the disease burden requires an understanding of factors associated with the prevention and management of CHD. Literacy skills may be one such factor. OBJECTIVES: To examine the independent and interactive effects of four literacy skills: reading, numeracy, oral language (speaking) and aural language (listening) on calculated 10-year risk of CHD and to determine whether the relationships between literacy skills and CHD risk were similar for men and women. DESIGN: We used multivariable linear regression to assess the individual, combined, and interactive effects of the four literacy skills on risk of CHD, adjusting for education and race. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred and nine English-speaking adults in Boston, MA and Providence, RI. MEASURES: Ten-year risk of coronary heart disease was calculated using the Framingham algorithm. Reading, oral language and aural language were measured using the Woodcock Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Numeracy was assessed through a modified version of the numeracy scale by Lipkus and colleagues. KEY RESULTS: When examined individually, reading (p = 0.007), numeracy (p = 0.001) and aural language (p = 0.004) skills were significantly associated with CHD risk among women; no literacy skills were associated with CHD risk in men. When examined together, there was some evidence for an interaction between numeracy and aural language among women suggesting that higher skills in one area (e.g., aural language) may compensate for difficulties in another resulting in an equally low risk of CHD. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study not only provide important insight into the independent and interactive effects of literacy skills on risk of CHD, they also highlight the need for the development of easy-to use assessments of the oral exchange in the health care setting and the need to better understand which literacy skills are most important for a given health outcome.
BACKGROUND:Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Reducing the disease burden requires an understanding of factors associated with the prevention and management of CHD. Literacy skills may be one such factor. OBJECTIVES: To examine the independent and interactive effects of four literacy skills: reading, numeracy, oral language (speaking) and aural language (listening) on calculated 10-year risk of CHD and to determine whether the relationships between literacy skills and CHD risk were similar for men and women. DESIGN: We used multivariable linear regression to assess the individual, combined, and interactive effects of the four literacy skills on risk of CHD, adjusting for education and race. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred and nine English-speaking adults in Boston, MA and Providence, RI. MEASURES: Ten-year risk of coronary heart disease was calculated using the Framingham algorithm. Reading, oral language and aural language were measured using the Woodcock Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Numeracy was assessed through a modified version of the numeracy scale by Lipkus and colleagues. KEY RESULTS: When examined individually, reading (p = 0.007), numeracy (p = 0.001) and aural language (p = 0.004) skills were significantly associated with CHD risk among women; no literacy skills were associated with CHD risk in men. When examined together, there was some evidence for an interaction between numeracy and aural language among women suggesting that higher skills in one area (e.g., aural language) may compensate for difficulties in another resulting in an equally low risk of CHD. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study not only provide important insight into the independent and interactive effects of literacy skills on risk of CHD, they also highlight the need for the development of easy-to use assessments of the oral exchange in the health care setting and the need to better understand which literacy skills are most important for a given health outcome.
Authors: Sunil Kripalani; Laura E Henderson; Ellen Y Chiu; Rashanda Robertson; Paul Kolm; Terry A Jacobson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Terry C Davis; Michael S Wolf; Pat F Bass; Mark Middlebrooks; Estela Kennen; David W Baker; Charles L Bennett; Ramon Durazo-Arvizu; Anna Bocchini; Stephanie Savory; Ruth M Parker Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Laurie T Martin; Matthias Schonlau; Ann Haas; Kathryn Pitkin Derose; Lindsay Rosenfeld; Stephen L Buka; Rima Rudd Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2011
Authors: Eric B Loucks; Stephen E Gilman; Chanelle J Howe; Ichiro Kawachi; Laura D Kubzansky; Rima E Rudd; Laurie T Martin; Arijit Nandi; Aude Wilhelm; Stephen L Buka Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2014-11-27
Authors: Eric B Loucks; Stephen L Buka; Michelle L Rogers; Tao Liu; Ichiro Kawachi; Laura D Kubzansky; Laurie T Martin; Stephen E Gilman Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Kathleen M Mazor; H Jane Rogers; Andrew E Williams; Douglas W Roblin; Bridget Gaglio; Terry S Field; Sarah M Greene; Paul K J Han; Mary E Costanza Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2012-07-11
Authors: Lynda J Stinson; Laura R Stroud; Stephen L Buka; Charles B Eaton; Bing Lu; Raymond Niaura; Eric B Loucks Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Sze Yan Liu; Stephen L Buka; Laura D Kubzansky; Ichiro Kawachi; Stephen E Gilman; Eric B Loucks Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2013-01-10 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: T M van Schaik; H T Jørstad; T B Twickler; R J G Peters; J P G Tijssen; M L Essink-Bot; M P Fransen Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.380