Eric B Loucks1, Stephen E Gilman2, Chanelle J Howe3, Ichiro Kawachi4, Laura D Kubzansky4, Rima E Rudd4, Laurie T Martin5, Arijit Nandi6, Aude Wilhelm3, Stephen L Buka3. 1. Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA eric.loucks@brown.edu. 2. Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA. 4. Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 5. RAND Corporation, Arlington, VA, USA. 6. McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Education is inversely associated with coronary heart disease (CHD) risk; however the mechanisms are poorly understood. The study objectives were to evaluate the extent to which rarely measured factors (literacy, time preference, sense of control) and more commonly measured factors (income, depressive symptomatology, body mass index) in the education-CHD literature explain the associations between education and CHD risk. METHOD: The study sample included 346 participants, aged 38 to 47 years (59.5% women), of the New England Family Study birth cohort. Ten-year CHD risk was calculated using the validated Framingham risk algorithm that utilizes diabetes, smoking, blood pressure, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, age, and gender. Multivariable regression and mediation analyses were performed. RESULTS: Regression analyses adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and childhood confounders (e.g., parental socioeconomic status, intelligence) demonstrated that relative to those with greater than or equal to college education, men and women with less than high school had 73.7% (95% confidence interval [CI; 29.5, 133.0]) and 48.2% (95% CI [17.5, 86.8]) higher 10-year CHD risk, respectively. Mediation analyses demonstrated significant indirect effects for reading comprehension in women (7.2%; 95% CI [0.7, 19.4]) and men (7.2%; 95% CI [0.8, 19.1]), and depressive symptoms (11.8%; 95% CI [2.5, 26.6]) and perceived constraint (6.7%, 95% CI [0.7, 19.1]) in women. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggested that reading comprehension in women and men, and depressive symptoms and perceived constraint in women, may mediate some of the association between education and CHD risk. If these mediated effects are interpreted causally, interventions targeting reading, depressive symptoms, and perceived constraint could reduce educational inequalities in CHD.
OBJECTIVE: Education is inversely associated with coronary heart disease (CHD) risk; however the mechanisms are poorly understood. The study objectives were to evaluate the extent to which rarely measured factors (literacy, time preference, sense of control) and more commonly measured factors (income, depressive symptomatology, body mass index) in the education-CHD literature explain the associations between education and CHD risk. METHOD: The study sample included 346 participants, aged 38 to 47 years (59.5% women), of the New England Family Study birth cohort. Ten-year CHD risk was calculated using the validated Framingham risk algorithm that utilizes diabetes, smoking, blood pressure, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, age, and gender. Multivariable regression and mediation analyses were performed. RESULTS: Regression analyses adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and childhood confounders (e.g., parental socioeconomic status, intelligence) demonstrated that relative to those with greater than or equal to college education, men and women with less than high school had 73.7% (95% confidence interval [CI; 29.5, 133.0]) and 48.2% (95% CI [17.5, 86.8]) higher 10-year CHD risk, respectively. Mediation analyses demonstrated significant indirect effects for reading comprehension in women (7.2%; 95% CI [0.7, 19.4]) and men (7.2%; 95% CI [0.8, 19.1]), and depressive symptoms (11.8%; 95% CI [2.5, 26.6]) and perceived constraint (6.7%, 95% CI [0.7, 19.1]) in women. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggested that reading comprehension in women and men, and depressive symptoms and perceived constraint in women, may mediate some of the association between education and CHD risk. If these mediated effects are interpreted causally, interventions targeting reading, depressive symptoms, and perceived constraint could reduce educational inequalities in CHD.
Authors: William M Schultz; Heval M Kelli; John C Lisko; Tina Varghese; Jia Shen; Pratik Sandesara; Arshed A Quyyumi; Herman A Taylor; Martha Gulati; John G Harold; Jennifer H Mieres; Keith C Ferdinand; George A Mensah; Laurence S Sperling Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Thu T Nguyen; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Ichiro Kawachi; Stephen E Gilman; Stefan Walter; M Maria Glymour Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Lauren A Taylor; Annabel Xulin Tan; Caitlin E Coyle; Chima Ndumele; Erika Rogan; Maureen Canavan; Leslie A Curry; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Zhao Li; Xiaofan Guo; Hongkun Jiang; Guozhe Sun; Yingxian Sun; Maria Roselle Abraham Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: T M van Schaik; H T Jørstad; T B Twickler; R J G Peters; J P G Tijssen; M L Essink-Bot; M P Fransen Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.380
Authors: Evah Wangui Odoi; Nicholas Nagle; Russell Zaretzki; Melissa Jordan; Chris DuClos; Kristina W Kintziger Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Alice R Carter; Dipender Gill; Neil M Davies; Amy E Taylor; Taavi Tillmann; Julien Vaucher; Robyn E Wootton; Marcus R Munafò; Gibran Hemani; Rainer Malik; Sudha Seshadri; Daniel Woo; Stephen Burgess; George Davey Smith; Michael V Holmes; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Laura D Howe; Abbas Dehghan Journal: BMJ Date: 2019-05-22
Authors: Jared W Magnani; Mahasin S Mujahid; Herbert D Aronow; Crystal W Cené; Victoria Vaughan Dickson; Edward Havranek; Lewis B Morgenstern; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Amy Pollak; Joshua Z Willey Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 29.690