Literature DB >> 20809129

Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of imaging-guided needle biopsy of renal masses. Retrospective analysis on 150 cases.

Andrea Veltri1, Irene Garetto, Irene Tosetti, Marco Busso, Alessandro Volpe, Donatella Pacchioni, Enrico Bollito, Mauro Papotti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review our method of perform needle biopsies of renal masses.
METHODS: We analysed 150 consecutive imaging-guided percutaneous biopsies. The pathological diagnosis was verified on clinical outcome in 129 cases (40 surgical resection, 53 thermal ablation, two medical treatment and 34 watchful waiting). Twenty-six patients underwent fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), 45 core-needle biopsy (CB) and 58 FNAB + CB. After review by two expert pathologists, cumulative accuracy of all FNAB (84) and all CB (103) was calculated. The rate of complications and mass management other than surgery was estimated.
RESULTS: The final diagnosis was malignancy in 97 cases (benign mass in 32). FNAB correctly diagnosed 64/84 masses (76.2%), CB 96/103 (93.2%). Of 58 masses submitted for both FNAB and CB, CB provided a 22.5% accuracy improvement. Major and minor complications occurred in 0% and 5.3%. Renal biopsy altered clinical management in 89/129 cases (68.9%), in terms of choosing therapeutic options other than surgery.
CONCLUSION: CB is more accurate than FNAB and should be preferred in renal mass biopsy. FNAB may precede CB when an expert pathologist can immediately evaluate the samples. Renal biopsy influences renal mass management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20809129     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1938-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  31 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous biopsy before interventional oncologic therapy: current status.

Authors:  Daniel B Brown; Carin F Gonsalves
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  A cost comparison of nephron-sparing surgical techniques for renal tumour.

Authors:  Yair Lotan; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Prognostic features of pathologic stage T1 renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Weber K Lau; John C Cheville; Michael L Blute; Amy L Weaver; Horst Zincke
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance of small (less than 4.0 cm) renal masses.

Authors:  Yann Neuzillet; Eric Lechevallier; Marc Andre; Laurent Daniel; Christian Coulange
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma--a meta-analysis and review.

Authors:  David A Kunkle; Brian L Egleston; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Contemporary results of percutaneous biopsy of 100 small renal masses: a single center experience.

Authors:  Alessandro Volpe; Kamal Mattar; Antonio Finelli; John R Kachura; Andrew J Evans; William R Geddie; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Intermediate comparison of partial nephrectomy and radiofrequency ablation for clinical T1a renal tumours.

Authors:  Joshua M Stern; Robert Svatek; Sangtae Park; Michael Hermann; Yair Lotan; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  CT-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of renal tumors before treatment with percutaneous ablation.

Authors:  Marta E Heilbrun; Ronald J Zagoria; A Julian Garvin; M Craig Hall; Kyle Krehbiel; Andrew Southwick; Peter E Clark
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  S A Fuhrman; L C Lasky; C Limas
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Diagnostic value of CT-guided biopsy of indeterminate renal masses.

Authors:  I Eshed; S Elias; A A Sidi
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  12 in total

1.  CT fluoroscopy-guided renal tumour cutting needle biopsy: retrospective evaluation of diagnostic yield, safety, and risk factors for diagnostic failure.

Authors:  Toshihiro Iguchi; Takao Hiraki; Yusuke Matsui; Hiroyasu Fujiwara; Jun Sakurai; Yoshihisa Masaoka; Hideo Gobara; Susumu Kanazawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  The role of renal biopsy in small renal masses.

Authors:  Rodolfo Burruni; Benoit Lhermitte; Yannick Cerantola; Thomas Tawadros; Jean-Yves Meuwly; Dominik Berthold; Patrice Jichlinski; Massimo Valerio
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Should Small Renal Masses Be Biopsied?

Authors:  Ricardo R N Leão; Ardalan E Ahmad; Patrick O Richard
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Diagnosis of renal tumors by in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Sabina Sevcenco; Martin Krssak; Domagoj Javor; Lothar Ponhold; Franklin E Kuehhas; Harun Fajkovic; Andrea Haitel; Sharokh F Shariat; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Evaluating the role for renal biopsy in T1 and T2 renal masses: A single-centre study.

Authors:  Dylan Hoare; Howard Evans; Heidi Richards; Rahim Samji
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Evolution from laparoscopic to robotic nephron sparing surgery: a high-volume laparoscopic center experience on achieving 'trifecta' outcomes.

Authors:  Arie Carneiro; Arjun Sivaraman; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Ettore Di Trapani; Eric Barret; Francois Rozet; Marc Galiano; Facundo Uriburu Pizzaro; Steeve Doizi; Nathalie Cathala; Annick Mombet; Dominique Prapotnich; Xavier Cathelineau
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Utilization of renal mass biopsy in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  John T Leppert; Janet Hanley; Todd H Wagner; Benjamin I Chung; Sandy Srinivas; Glenn M Chertow; James D Brooks; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Renal cell carcinoma seeding of a percutaneous biopsy tract.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Mullins; Ronald Rodriguez
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Extensive renal infarction following percutaneous biopsy of a small renal mass: A case report.

Authors:  Samuel Abourbih; Saad Aldousari; Fadi Brimo; Atilla Omeroglu; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 10.  Heterogeneity and renal mass biopsy: a review of its role and reliability.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Robert G Uzzo; Marc C Smaldone
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.248

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.