Literature DB >> 20807863

Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS)-defined morbidity and mortality associated with pediatric ventricular assist device support at a single US center: the Stanford experience.

Mary Lynette Stein1, Robert Robbins, Arash Alen Sabati, Olaf Reinhartz, Clifford Chin, Esther Liu, Daniel Bernstein, Stephen Roth, Gail Wright, Bruce Reitz, David Rosenthal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of ventricular assist devices (VADs) to bridge pediatric patients to heart transplantation has increased dramatically over the last 15 years. In this report, we present the largest US single-center report of pediatric VAD use to date. We present detailed descriptions of morbidity and mortality associated with VAD support, using standard Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) criteria for pediatrics to facilitate the comparison of these results to other studies. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We retrospectively identified 25 patients younger than 18 years with 27 episodes of mechanical circulatory support using VADs as bridge to heart transplantation from January 1998 to December 2007. Survival to transplant for the entire cohort was 74%. The most common major morbidities, as defined by INTERMACS criteria for a pediatric population, were respiratory failure, major localized infections, major bleeding events, hepatic dysfunction, and right heart failure. Major neurological events occurred in 48% of the study population. The median time to the first occurrence of an adverse event was less than 14 days for respiratory failure, right heart failure, major localized infection, and major bleeding. Patients who died before transplantation had significantly more adverse events per day of support than did those who were successfully transplanted. Episodes of major bleeding, tamponade, acute renal failure, respiratory failure, and right heart failure were all associated with increased risk of mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: INTERMACS criteria can be successfully used to analyze pediatric VAD outcomes. These data serve as a baseline for future studies of VAD support in children and indicate good survival rates but considerable morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20807863     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.109.918672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Heart Fail        ISSN: 1941-3289            Impact factor:   8.790


  11 in total

1.  Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy in Barth syndrome: an example of an undulating cardiac phenotype necessitating mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation.

Authors:  Samuel P Hanke; Aimee B Gardner; John P Lombardi; Peter B Manning; David P Nelson; Jeffrey A Towbin; John L Jefferies; Angela Lorts
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Early Biventricular Assist Device Use in Children: A Single-Center Review of 31 Patients.

Authors:  Jacob R Miller; Deirdre J Epstein; Matthew C Henn; Tracey Guthrie; Richard B Schuessler; Kathleen E Simpson; Charles E Canter; Pirooz Eghtesady; Umar S Boston
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.872

3.  Introduction to the series: challenges and opportunities in pediatric heart failure and transplantation.

Authors:  Daniel Bernstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Current approaches to device implantation in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients.

Authors:  Jacob R Miller; Timothy S Lancaster; Pirooz Eghtesady
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2015-03-03

Review 5.  Ventricular assist device use in congenital heart disease with a comparison to heart transplant.

Authors:  Jacob R Miller; Pirooz Eghtesady
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.744

6.  Adverse events in children implanted with ventricular assist devices in the United States: Data from the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (PediMACS).

Authors:  David N Rosenthal; Christopher S Almond; Robert D Jaquiss; Christine E Peyton; Scott R Auerbach; David R Morales; Deirdre J Epstein; Ryan S Cantor; Robert L Kormos; David C Naftel; Ryan J Butts; Nancy S Ghanayem; James K Kirklin; Elizabeth D Blume
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 10.247

7.  Outcomes in children with advanced heart failure in Japan: importance of mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Mikiko Shimizu; Tomohiro Nishinaka; Kei Inai; Toshio Nakanishi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Ventricular assist device infections.

Authors:  Denis Spelman; Donald Esmore
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacology considerations for children supported with ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Jennifer Sherwin; Elizabeth Thompson; Kevin D Hill; Kevin Watt; Andrew J Lodge; Daniel Gonzalez; Christoph P Hornik
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 1.093

10.  Left ventricular assist device therapy: the Kuwait experience.

Authors:  Riyad Tarazi; Mustafa Ridha; Mohammad Shammsah; Khaldoon AlHumood; Jean Tesreni; Mohamed Badawy; Amir Mohamed; Adel Maher
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.