Literature DB >> 20807552

An evaluation of hERG current assay performance: Translating preclinical safety studies to clinical QT prolongation.

Gary Gintant1.   

Abstract

Block of delayed rectifier current (I(Kr), Kv11.1 encoding the hERG gene) is associated with delayed cardiac repolarization (QTc prolongation), a surrogate marker of proarrhythmia. Despite its recognized role in assessing QTc prolongation risk, a quantitative analysis of the utility and limitations of the hERG current assay has not been reported. To benchmark hERG assay performance, this retrospective study compared hERG block potency with drug-induced QTc prolongation assessed during rigorous thorough QT (TQT) clinical studies for 39 drugs from multiple classes. To place block in context, hERG safety margins (IC(50) values for block/mean maximal plasma drug concentrations during TQT studies) were compared to QTc prolongation (QTc increase≥5ms). Most (9/10) drugs eliciting essentially no hERG block at maximal concentrations demonstrate no QTc prolongation despite representing a wide hERG safety margin range. Based on receiver-operator characteristics, a hERG safety margin of 45 provided optimal overall performance linking safety margins to QTc prolongation (sensitivity (true positive rate)=0.64, specificity (true negative rate)=0.88); the area under the receiver-operator curve (0.72) is indicative of moderate overall concordance. Likelihood ratios calculated from multitier contingency tables suggest that QTc prolonging drugs are only 5-7 times as likely to demonstrate low safety margins (1-30 range) compared to drugs that do not prolong QTc. Paradoxically, higher safety margins demonstrate lesser confidence predicting prolongation. The overall limitations of hERG safety margins shown using these quantitative, evidence-based approaches highlight the need for additional preclinical assays and adaptive strategies throughout drug discovery to reliably mitigate QTc prolongation risk. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20807552     DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0163-7258            Impact factor:   12.310


  59 in total

1.  Ions, equations and electrons: the evolving role of computer simulations in cardiac electrophysiology safety evaluations.

Authors:  Gary Gintant
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Dynamic monitoring of beating periodicity of stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes as a predictive tool for preclinical safety assessment.

Authors:  Yama A Abassi; Biao Xi; Nan Li; Wei Ouyang; Alexander Seiler; Manfred Watzele; Ralf Kettenhofen; Heribert Bohlen; Andreas Ehlich; Eugen Kolossov; Xiaobo Wang; Xiao Xu
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  The High Cost of Stroke and Stroke Cytoprotection Research.

Authors:  Paul A Lapchak; John H Zhang
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 6.829

4.  The Effects of the Adenosine Receptor Antagonists on the Reverse of Cardiovascular Toxic Effects Induced by Citalopram In-Vivo Rat Model of Poisoning.

Authors:  Müjgan Büyükdeligöz; Nil Hocaoğlu; Kubilay Oransay; Yeşim Tunçok; Şule Kalkan
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.021

Review 5.  Reducing safety-related drug attrition: the use of in vitro pharmacological profiling.

Authors:  Joanne Bowes; Andrew J Brown; Jacques Hamon; Wolfgang Jarolimek; Arun Sridhar; Gareth Waldron; Steven Whitebread
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 6.  Dealing with global safety issues : was the response to QT-liability of non-cardiac drugs well coordinated?

Authors:  Norman Stockbridge; Joel Morganroth; Rashmi R Shah; Christine Garnett
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  ADMET evaluation in drug discovery. 12. Development of binary classification models for prediction of hERG potassium channel blockage.

Authors:  Sichao Wang; Youyong Li; Junmei Wang; Lei Chen; Liling Zhang; Huidong Yu; Tingjun Hou
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  The 'overly-sensitive' heart: sodium channel block and QRS interval prolongation.

Authors:  Gary A Gintant; David J Gallacher; Michael K Pugsley
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 9.  Evolution of strategies to improve preclinical cardiac safety testing.

Authors:  Gary Gintant; Philip T Sager; Norman Stockbridge
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 84.694

10.  A tutorial on model informed approaches to cardiovascular safety with focus on cardiac repolarisation.

Authors:  S Y A Cheung; J Parkinson; U Wählby-Hamrén; C D Dota; Å M Kragh; L Bergenholm; T Vik; T Collins; C Arfvidsson; C E Pollard; H K Tomkinson; B Hamrén
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 2.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.