Literature DB >> 20802131

Pretreatment with the nitric oxide donor SNAP or nerve transection blocks humoral preconditioning by remote limb ischemia or intra-arterial adenosine.

Tor Steensrud1, Jing Li, Xiaojing Dai, Cedric Manlhiot, Rajesh K Kharbanda, Michael Tropak, Andrew Redington.   

Abstract

We have previously shown that remote ischemic preconditioning (rIPC) by transient limb ischemia leads to the release of a circulating factor(s) that induces potent myocardial protection. Intra-arterial injection of adenosine into a limb also leads to cardioprotection, but the mechanism of its signal transduction is poorly understood. Eleven groups of rabbits received saline control or rIPC or adenosine administration with additional pretreatment with the nitric oxide (NO) synthase blocker N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester, the NO donor S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine, its non-NO-donating derivative N-acetylpenicillamine, or femoral nerve section. Blood was then drawn from each animal, and the dialysate of the plasma was used to perfuse a naïve heart from an untreated donor. Infarct size was measured after 30 min of global ischemia and 120 min reperfusion. When compared with that of the control, mean infarct size was significantly smaller in groups treated with rIPC alone (P < 0.01) and intra-arterial adenosine (P < 0.01). Pretreatment with N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester or N-acetylpenicillamine did not affect the level of protection induced by rIPC (P = not significant, compared with rIPC alone) or intra-arterial adenosine (P = not significant, compared with intra-arterial adenosine alone), but prior femoral nerve transection or pretreatment with S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine abolished the cardioprotective effect of intra-arterial adenosine and rIPC. Intra-arterial adenosine, like rIPC, releases a blood-borne cardioprotective factor(s) that is dependent on an intact femoral nerve and is inhibited by pretreatment with a NO donor. These results may be important when designing or assessing the results of clinical trials of adenosine or rIPC cardioprotection, where NO donors are used as part of therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20802131     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00396.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  48 in total

Review 1.  Ischaemic conditioning: pitfalls on the path to clinical translation.

Authors:  Karin Przyklenk
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Cardioprotection by remote ischemic conditioning and its signal transduction.

Authors:  Petra Kleinbongard; Andreas Skyschally; Gerd Heusch
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 3.  Remote conditioning the heart overview: translatability and mechanism.

Authors:  Michael Rahbek Schmidt; Andrew Redington; Hans Erik Bøtker
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 4.  The role of gasotransmitters NO, H2S and CO in myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury and cardioprotection by preconditioning, postconditioning and remote conditioning.

Authors:  Ioanna Andreadou; Efstathios K Iliodromitis; Tienush Rassaf; Rainer Schulz; Andreas Papapetropoulos; Péter Ferdinandy
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  Remote ischemic conditioning.

Authors:  Gerd Heusch; Hans Erik Bøtker; Karin Przyklenk; Andrew Redington; Derek Yellon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Electroacupuncture reduces myocardial infarct size and improves post-ischemic recovery by invoking release of humoral, dialyzable, cardioprotective factors.

Authors:  Kathrine L Redington; Tara Disenhouse; Jing Li; Can Wei; Xiaojing Dai; Rachel Gladstone; Cedric Manlhiot; Andrew N Redington
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.781

7.  Impact of O-GlcNAc on cardioprotection by remote ischaemic preconditioning in non-diabetic and diabetic patients.

Authors:  Rebekka V Jensen; Natasha E Zachara; Per H Nielsen; Hans Henrik Kimose; Steen B Kristiansen; Hans Erik Bøtker
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 8.  The Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning on Human Exercise Performance.

Authors:  Anthony V Incognito; Jamie F Burr; Philip J Millar
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Remote ischemic conditioning in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction - an update.

Authors:  Jun Chong; Heerajnarain Bulluck; En Ping Yap; Andrew Fw Ho; William A Boisvert; Derek J Hausenloy
Journal:  Cond Med       Date:  2018-08

Review 10.  Remote ischemic preconditioning and renoprotection: from myth to a novel therapeutic option?

Authors:  Natig Gassanov; Amir M Nia; Evren Caglayan; Fikret Er
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.