BACKGROUND: The liberated domain I of the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor [uPAR(I)] is a significant prognostic marker in lung and ovarian cancer, although the uPAR(I) concentration is below the limit of quantification (LOQ) in a substantial proportion of patient samples (Lung Cancer 2005;48:349-55; Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:5785-93; APMIS 2009;117:755-61). This study was undertaken to design an immunoassay with improved functional sensitivity for measuring uPAR(I) and to evaluate the prognostic value of uPAR(I) for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. METHODS: Surface plasmon resonance analysis identified 2 monoclonal antibodies, R3 and R20, that simultaneously bind to the liberated uPAR(I) but not to intact uPAR. We used R3 for capture and Eu-labeled R20 for detection in designing a 2-site sandwich time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (TR-FIA 4) for measuring liberated uPAR(I). TR-FIA 4 was validated for use with citrated plasma. The prognostic value of the uPAR(I) concentration was evaluated in 298 CRC patients. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for the uni- and multivariate survival analyses. RESULTS: The LOQ was 0.65 pmol/L. Liberated uPAR(I) was measurable in all patient samples with TR-FIA 4. In the multivariate analysis that included sex, age, tumor stage, tumor localization, and adjuvant treatment, the uPAR(I) concentration measured with TR-FIA 4 (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.15-2.57; P = 0.009), as well as the concentration of intact soluble uPAR plus the cleaved uPAR fragment containing domains II and III, tumor stage, and age were independent predictors of prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: TR-FIA 4 has a functional sensitivity improved 4-fold over that of the previous uPAR(I) assay. The uPAR(I) concentration measured with TR-FIA 4 is an independent predictor of prognosis in CRC patients.
BACKGROUND: The liberated domain I of the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor [uPAR(I)] is a significant prognostic marker in lung and ovarian cancer, although the uPAR(I) concentration is below the limit of quantification (LOQ) in a substantial proportion of patient samples (Lung Cancer 2005;48:349-55; Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:5785-93; APMIS 2009;117:755-61). This study was undertaken to design an immunoassay with improved functional sensitivity for measuring uPAR(I) and to evaluate the prognostic value of uPAR(I) for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. METHODS: Surface plasmon resonance analysis identified 2 monoclonal antibodies, R3 and R20, that simultaneously bind to the liberated uPAR(I) but not to intact uPAR. We used R3 for capture and Eu-labeled R20 for detection in designing a 2-site sandwich time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (TR-FIA 4) for measuring liberated uPAR(I). TR-FIA 4 was validated for use with citrated plasma. The prognostic value of the uPAR(I) concentration was evaluated in 298 CRCpatients. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for the uni- and multivariate survival analyses. RESULTS: The LOQ was 0.65 pmol/L. Liberated uPAR(I) was measurable in all patient samples with TR-FIA 4. In the multivariate analysis that included sex, age, tumor stage, tumor localization, and adjuvant treatment, the uPAR(I) concentration measured with TR-FIA 4 (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.15-2.57; P = 0.009), as well as the concentration of intact soluble uPAR plus the cleaved uPAR fragment containing domains II and III, tumor stage, and age were independent predictors of prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: TR-FIA 4 has a functional sensitivity improved 4-fold over that of the previous uPAR(I) assay. The uPAR(I) concentration measured with TR-FIA 4 is an independent predictor of prognosis in CRCpatients.
Authors: Bodil E Engelmann; Annika Loft; Andreas Kjær; Hans J Nielsen; Thomas A Gerds; Eric V Benzon; Nils Brünner; Ib J Christensen; Susanne H Hansson; Niels H Holländer; Michael H Kristensen; Johan Löfgren; Elena Markova; Carsten Sloth; Liselotte Højgaard Journal: Oncologist Date: 2014-01-22
Authors: R L Eefsen; L Engelholm; W Alpizar-Alpizar; G G E Van den Eynden; P B Vermeulen; I J Christensen; O D Laerum; H C Rolff; G Høyer-Hansen; B Vainer; K Osterlind; M Illemann Journal: Cancer Microenviron Date: 2015-08-14
Authors: Efrat Harel; Jun Shoji; Vivek Abraham; Loan Miller; Zoltan G Laszik; Andrew King; Dejan Dobi; Gyula Szabo; Byron Hann; Minnie M Sarwal; Charles S Craik; Flavio Vincenti Journal: Transplantation Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 5.385
Authors: Line Hammer Dohn; Helle Pappot; Benedikte Richter Iversen; Martin Illemann; Gunilla Høyer-Hansen; Ib Jarle Christensen; Peter Thind; Lisbeth Salling; Hans von der Maase; Ole Didrik Laerum Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Line H Dohn; Peter Thind; Lisbeth Salling; Henriette Lindberg; Sofie Oersted; Ib J Christensen; Ole D Laerum; Martin Illemann; Hans von der Maase; Gunilla Høyer-Hansen; Helle Pappot Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Martin Illemann; Ole Didrik Laerum; Jane Preuss Hasselby; Tine Thurison; Gunilla Høyer-Hansen; Hans Jørgen Nielsen; Ib Jarle Christensen Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2014-05-30 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Bodil Elisabeth Engelmann; Annika Loft; Andreas Kjær; Hans Jørgen Nielsen; Anne Kiil Berthelsen; Tina Binderup; Kim Brinch; Nils Brünner; Thomas Alexander Gerds; Gunilla Høyer-Hansen; Michael Holmsgaard Kristensen; Engin Yeter Kurt; Jan Erik Latocha; Gunnar Lindblom; Carsten Sloth; Liselotte Højgaard Journal: Scand J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-11-29 Impact factor: 2.423